hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,244
- Likes
- 161,762
So you want a recession which is tough on everyone to reset the group of employees who have found their commodity (their labor) to be at an premium in the job market?I agree, where it can be done I don't have a problem with it but too many people think they can work from home and be just as productive and they can't. Today's job market allows them to keep jumping ship to avoid reality.
you base all your business decisions on how a call center from India runs?
you must based on the study you posted. Tell me do you offer Rama Navami or Diwali as paid holidays?
So you want a recession which is tough on everyone to reset the group of employees who have found their commodity (their labor) to be at an premium in the job market?
Two partners and I just started a business. It launched this week. We train owners and managers on how to develop and maintain healthy relationships among their team. Our advice is, go after the cream of the crop for your jobs and create a culture where they will not want to "jump ship". Smart employers are running to meet the new employee expectations.
I have been full time in the office since mid 2021, I do better in the office, but its complete crap to think that the opposite isn't true for many.LOL
It's antidotal of course but I don't recall ever having my best most productive employees telling me how productive they are. It's typically been the borderline employees that feel the need to waste time telling me how great of an employee they are.
And no I'm not basing any decisions on those studies, all of my office people have been back in the office (except sales) for a while now. Of course we have flexible schedules (I'm not an ogre) but we don't have anyone working from home full time. Funny thing is I never had to mandate it, they all just started trickling back in after I canned the woman running a daycare on our dime.
I have been full time in the office since mid 2021, I do better in the office, but its complete crap to think that the opposite isn't true for many.
you are basing your opinion on the need to be back in the office on that study. I offered a meta study that compiled data from multiple studies across multiple industries here in the US that says production went up with WFH. you want to remove that because you found one study on an Indian call center that offered a different line. to me that sounds like its a preference thing and not a real issue. especially concerning regarding your comments on the recession.
my panties are in a wad because the companies are calling people back in to feed ego, and not for any real reason. your original article even supported that it wasn't for a real reason, and that companies are just getting creative with the messaging to sell a lie.I stated a couple times that WFH is great for some employees but for many it isn't and the reality is the slackers are going to ruin it for the ones that can handle working from home. I don't know why you have your panties in such a wad over this? More and more companies are calling people back into the office, that is just a fact.
my panties are in a wad because the companies are calling people back in to feed ego, and not for any real reason. your original article even supported that it wasn't for a real reason, and that companies are just getting creative with the messaging to sell a lie.
Lies to screw over employees should be concern for everyone because they either come from or create unequal working conditions. If the companies aren't losing production, there is not an imbalance towards the employees. IMO WFH helped the balance return to the middle after heavily favoring the employer for a long time. something that pushes that balance back towards the employer without offering some return compensation to the employee is a bad thing.
I have long thought if companies are actually open for WFH, but want people back in the office they need to offer some compensation for it. Extra pay, fewer hours, more PTO for office workers. If there is a financial/efficiency gain for the office from working in the office lets see the employee's side of it.
right now the only justification to bring people back is "I don't like it".
my panties are in a wad because the companies are calling people back in to feed ego, and not for any real reason. your original article even supported that it wasn't for a real reason, and that companies are just getting creative with the messaging to sell a lie.
Lies to screw over employees should be concern for everyone because they either come from or create unequal working conditions. If the companies aren't losing production, there is not an imbalance towards the employees. IMO WFH helped the balance return to the middle after heavily favoring the employer for a long time. something that pushes that balance back towards the employer without offering some return compensation to the employee is a bad thing.
I have long thought if companies are actually open for WFH, but want people back in the office they need to offer some compensation for it. Extra pay, fewer hours, more PTO for office workers. If there is a financial/efficiency gain for the office from working in the office lets see the employee's side of it.
right now the only justification to bring people back is "I don't like it".