The Hunter Biden Thread

#5,580
#5,580
Nothing straight about this administration. Time for a SC.
Fact is the DOJ had an open investigation on Hunter and other issues
 
#5,583
#5,583
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Click to expand...


interesting how the narrative has changed from "I never discussed my son's business with him; period" to "Joe was 'not in business with' his son".

So we have:

1. direct witness testimony Joe was involved (at least 2 different witnesses)
2. photographic evidence of Joe with Hunter and business partners
3. bank transactions flowing through intricate pathways to many Biden family members
4. written correspondence from Hunter implicating Joe's involvement
5. an FBI confidential human source report citing not only Joe's direct involvement but illegal activity
6. records showing Hunter's travel on AF2 on trips to business partners
7. probably more examples I'm forgetting.

How anyone can say there's nothing to see here is just more sad tribalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, norrislakevol and 10 others
#5,584
#5,584
volinbham said:
interesting how the narrative has changed from "I never discussed my son's business with him; period" to "Joe was 'not in business with' his son".

So we have:

1. direct witness testimony Joe was involved (at least 2 different witnesses)
2. photographic evidence of Joe with Hunter and business partners
3. bank transactions flowing through intricate pathways to many Biden family members
4. written correspondence from Hunter implicating Joe's involvement
5. an FBI confidential human source report citing not only Joe's direct involvement but illegal activity
6. records showing Hunter's travel on AF2 on trips to business partners
7. probably more examples I'm forgetting.

How anyone can say there's nothing to see here is just more sad tribalism.
Click to expand...

It's all just a vast right wing conspiracy.


Oh and but Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, norrislakevol and 1 other person
#5,585
#5,585
volinbham said:
interesting how the narrative has changed from "I never discussed my son's business with him; period" to "Joe was 'not in business with' his son".

So we have:

1. direct witness testimony Joe was involved (at least 2 different witnesses)
2. photographic evidence of Joe with Hunter and business partners
3. bank transactions flowing through intricate pathways to many Biden family members
4. written correspondence from Hunter implicating Joe's involvement
5. an FBI confidential human source report citing not only Joe's direct involvement but illegal activity
6. records showing Hunter's travel on AF2 on trips to business partners
7. probably more examples I'm forgetting.

How anyone can say there's nothing to see here is just more sad tribalism.
Click to expand...


1) Joe was involved? In what way? What does that mean? What evidence supports this?

4) So 4 supports it? What's the correspondence say?

5) there is no evidence of "direct involvement or illegal activity"---period. GOP has nothing. Trying to smear Joe with Hunter--that's the play. The real play is working to stoke up the rubes---much as they did with the supposed Hillary Benghazi and email nonsense. There was nothing with either but the rubes had fire coming out of their ears....."Must be something, Earl!"
 
#5,586
#5,586
turbovol said:
1) Joe was involved? In what way? What does that mean? What evidence supports this?

4) So 4 supports it? What's the correspondence say?

5) there is no evidence of "direct involvement or illegal activity"---period. GOP has nothing. Trying to smear Joe with Hunter--that's the play. The real play is working to stoke up the rubes---much as they did with the supposed Hillary Benghazi and email nonsense. There was nothing with either but the rubes had fire coming out of their ears....."Must be something, Earl!"
Click to expand...
Just out of curiosity....Did Trump collude with Russia?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol, UT_Dutchman and 4 others
#5,587
#5,587
turbovol said:
1) Joe was involved? In what way? What does that mean? What evidence supports this?

4) So 4 supports it? What's the correspondence say?

5) there is no evidence of "direct involvement or illegal activity"---period. GOP has nothing. Trying to smear Joe with Hunter--that's the play. The real play is working to stoke up the rubes---much as they did with the supposed Hillary Benghazi and email nonsense. There was nothing with either but the rubes had fire coming out of their ears....."Must be something, Earl!"
Click to expand...

The Big Guy is in it up to his eyeballs. Hunter was his bagman. He’s been grifting of an influence peddling scheme with some our biggest adversaries.

He’s counting on you to keep defending his honor by denying the obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol, UT_Dutchman and 10 others
#5,590
#5,590
Hunter Biden's Lawyer faces possible sanctions after accusations of Lying in criminal tax case

The judge presiding over the Hunter Biden case threatened Biden's legal team with sanctions over allegations about lying in his criminal case.

Hunter Biden's legal team is accused of misrepresenting themselves to get information about IRS whistleblowers removed from the docket. Delaware Judge Maryellen Noreika gave Biden's legal time until 9 p.m. on Tuesday to explain their side.

A lawyer from Hunter's legal team is accused of misrepresenting who she was when asking to remove amicus materials. They allegedly called to ask the clerk to have the information sealed.


"The Court has discussed the matter with the relevant individuals in the Clerk's Office and has been informed that the caller, Ms. Jessica Bengels, represented that she worked with Mr. Kittila and requested the amicus materials be taken down because they contained sensitive grand jury, taxpayer and social security information," the order read.

"It appears that the caller misrepresented her identity and who she worked for in an attempt to improperly convince the clerk's office to remove the amicus materials from the docket," the judge added.

Hunter Biden's lawyer faces possible sanctions after accusations of lying in criminal tax case
 
#5,591
#5,591
volinbham said:
interesting how the narrative has changed from "I never discussed my son's business with him; period" to "Joe was 'not in business with' his son".

So we have:

1. direct witness testimony Joe was involved (at least 2 different witnesses)
2. photographic evidence of Joe with Hunter and business partners
3. bank transactions flowing through intricate pathways to many Biden family members
4. written correspondence from Hunter implicating Joe's involvement
5. an FBI confidential human source report citing not only Joe's direct involvement but illegal activity
6. records showing Hunter's travel on AF2 on trips to business partners
7. probably more examples I'm forgetting.

How anyone can say there's nothing to see here is just more sad tribalism.
Click to expand...
Generally where there is smoke there is fire and this situation is puffing more than Tommy Chong’s bong.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, whodeycin85 and 2 others
#5,592
#5,592
volinbham said:
interesting how the narrative has changed from "I never discussed my son's business with him; period" to "Joe was 'not in business with' his son".

So we have:

1. direct witness testimony Joe was involved (at least 2 different witnesses)
2. photographic evidence of Joe with Hunter and business partners
3. bank transactions flowing through intricate pathways to many Biden family members
4. written correspondence from Hunter implicating Joe's involvement
5. an FBI confidential human source report citing not only Joe's direct involvement but illegal activity
6. records showing Hunter's travel on AF2 on trips to business partners
7. probably more examples I'm forgetting.

How anyone can say there's nothing to see here is just more sad tribalism.
Click to expand...

easy ... dnc emailed the instructions

 
#5,593
#5,593
surprise-surprise-surprise.0.jpg


Hunter Biden's counsel faces possible sanctions after accusations of lying in criminal tax case
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman and W.TN.Orange Blood
#5,597
#5,597
EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's lawyers face SANCTIONS after being accused of lying to the clerk in his criminal tax case as judge orders First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by tonight

  • The alleged dirty trick was a ploy to remove testimony from IRS whistleblowers from the court docket
Hunter Biden's lawyers have responded to allegations that they conspired to lie to a court clerk in the First Son's criminal case in Delaware by saying the incident was simply an 'unfortunate misunderstanding.'

Delaware Judge Maryellen Noreika had ordered the First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by 9pm Tuesday or be sanctioned.

Just before the deadline, Hunter's Latham & Watkins lawyer Matthew Salerno filed a response claiming the incident was down to 'an unfortunate and unintentional miscommunication.'

It was alleged that Hunter's lawyers sought to remove testimony from IRS whistleblowers about the Justice Department's lackluster criminal investigation into his tax offenses from the court docket.

'The matter under consideration appears to stem from an unfortunate and unintentional miscommunication between a staff member at our firm and employees of the Court. We have no idea how the misunderstanding occurred, but our understanding is there was no misrepresentation,' Salerno wrote to Judge Noreika on Tuesday evening.

He claimed that Jessica Bengels, the Latham staffer accused of pretending to be from another law firm, has a phone number which should show up as 'LATHAM' on the clerk's caller ID.

EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's lawyers face SANCTIONS after being accused of lying to the clerk in his criminal tax case as judge orders First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by tonight | Daily Mail Online
 
#5,599
#5,599
Franklin Pierce said:
EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's lawyers face SANCTIONS after being accused of lying to the clerk in his criminal tax case as judge orders First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by tonight

  • The alleged dirty trick was a ploy to remove testimony from IRS whistleblowers from the court docket
Hunter Biden's lawyers have responded to allegations that they conspired to lie to a court clerk in the First Son's criminal case in Delaware by saying the incident was simply an 'unfortunate misunderstanding.'

Delaware Judge Maryellen Noreika had ordered the First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by 9pm Tuesday or be sanctioned.

Just before the deadline, Hunter's Latham & Watkins lawyer Matthew Salerno filed a response claiming the incident was down to 'an unfortunate and unintentional miscommunication.'

It was alleged that Hunter's lawyers sought to remove testimony from IRS whistleblowers about the Justice Department's lackluster criminal investigation into his tax offenses from the court docket.

'The matter under consideration appears to stem from an unfortunate and unintentional miscommunication between a staff member at our firm and employees of the Court. We have no idea how the misunderstanding occurred, but our understanding is there was no misrepresentation,' Salerno wrote to Judge Noreika on Tuesday evening.

He claimed that Jessica Bengels, the Latham staffer accused of pretending to be from another law firm, has a phone number which should show up as 'LATHAM' on the clerk's caller ID.

EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden's lawyers face SANCTIONS after being accused of lying to the clerk in his criminal tax case as judge orders First Son's attorneys to explain themselves by tonight | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
Was this Biden's attorney who was smoking dope on his apartment's balcony?

 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top