The Hunter Biden Thread

#6,576
#6,576
SpaceCoastVol said:
It's one off damage control. Zero risk that anyone will ever do any jail time, but "hey, see? We aren't biased and only going after the right".

Vivek said it. It's a smokescreen.

But I'm sure you buy it.
Click to expand...

Why would the DOJ who's in the bag for Biden need damage control?
 
#6,581
#6,581
Septic said:
Why would the DOJ who's in the bag for Biden need damage control?
Click to expand...

They are currently in the process of letting the statue of limitations impact the potential tax related charges and unless they charge hunter for the FARA charges like they did Manafort they will need damage control for half the country.
 
#6,582
#6,582
Vol8188 said:
Damage control is about the public not Biden or the DOJ. Yes, even if they’re doing Biden’s bidding, they still have to care about public opinion.
Click to expand...
The public? What does that even mean?

Do you think they'd be worried about looking biased NOW but not after charging Donny and his insurrection henchmen?

You guys are spinning like records, trying to reconcile all of this in a way that's going to fit your worldview. I guess now it's the denial, "nOtHiNg WiLl HaPpEn."
 
#6,583
#6,583
Excellent article for those lapping up the media's cover for this corrupt crime family. With trump, the democrat davidians were told to continually say in the media that "no one is above the law". Now the orders they got this week are to say "no evidence" at all in the hunter case. At least Turley helps to expose them ...

jonathanturley.org

Five Facts That Compel the Biden Impeachment Inquiry

Below is my column in The Messenger on the reason why an impeachment inquiry is warranted. I do not believe that a case for impeachment has been made, but there is clearly a need for an investigat…
jonathanturley.org
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#6,584
#6,584
Septic said:
The public? What does that even mean?

Do you think they'd be worried about looking biased NOW but not after charging Donny and his insurrection henchmen?

You guys are spinning like records, trying to reconcile all of this in a way that's going to fit your worldview. I guess now it's the denial, "nOtHiNg WiLl HaPpEn."
Click to expand...

Interesting. What’s the reasonable way of looking at this? Other than pretending you don’t know what “the public”, how specifically would a reasonable man see this?

What I see is a man who clearly acted as a foreign agent, cleared millions from multiple foreign businesses as a lobbyist on their behalf, and is on record saying he has to give the president half his money.

If you agree with the above, how can you know all those things and think “charge him with a gun crime and move on” is the “reasonable” approach?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#6,588
#6,588
Vol8188 said:
Interesting. What’s the reasonable way of looking at this? Other than pretending you don’t know what “the public”, how specifically would a reasonable man see this?

What I see is a man who clearly acted as a foreign agent, cleared millions from multiple foreign businesses as a lobbyist on their behalf, and is on record saying he has to give the president half his money.

If you agree with the above, how can you know all those things and think “charge him with a gun crime and move on” is the “reasonable” approach?
Click to expand...

You had me until you had him "giving the president money." That's mere speculation.

If he did and it comes out in court, both of them ought to go to jail.

As it sits now, there's no there, there. You just have speculation the Joe did something wrong, it's probable that he did but it doesn't matter what we think - it matters what can be proven.

Hunter is a scumbag, no one questions that. But you guys are trying desperately to punish Joe for Hunters sins and ya'll look desperate and deranged for doing so. Maybe ya'll will find a smoking gun, but right now you've got nothing. Heck, even the R's are admitting that. That's not me hoping the Biden's get off, it's fact.

Trying to blur the lines, muddy the waters between Hunters shenanigans and what you can prove Joe did is the trumpers only move. Good luck.
 
#6,589
#6,589
Septic said:
You had me until you had him "giving the president money." That's mere speculation.
Click to expand...

You need to go back and read exactly what I said. Hunter is on record saying he had to give his father 1/2 of his salary. That’s not speculation. You may be honestly unaware of it because CNN and MSNBC have refused to cover it, but that doesn’t make it less of a fact.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#6,590
#6,590
Vol8188 said:
You need to go back and read exactly what I said. Hunter is on record saying he had to give his father 1/2 of his salary. That’s not speculation. You may be honestly unaware of it because CNN and MSNBC have refused to cover it, but that doesn’t make it less of a fact.
Click to expand...
I guess the question becomes - is crackhead Hunter “saying it” in a text (or wherever it was, not sure) actually proof that Joe received the funds?

I doubt it. Unless Hunter is going to take the stand and testify that he paid his father half his salary.
 
#6,591
#6,591
Vol8188 said:
You need to go back and read exactly what I said. Hunter is on record saying he had to give his father 1/2 of his salary. That’s not speculation. You may be honestly unaware of it because CNN and MSNBC have refused to cover it, but that doesn’t make it less of a fact
Click to expand...
nm
 
#6,592
#6,592
85SugarVol said:
I guess the question becomes - is crackhead Hunter “saying it” in a text (or wherever it was, not sure) actually proof that Joe received the funds?

I doubt it. Unless Hunter is going to take the stand and testify that he paid his father half his salary.
Click to expand...

Sure. That’s the next valid question. Sadly it seems like a question that hasn’t actually been investigated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#6,598
#6,598
85SugarVol said:
It’s a meme. I get it.

But it’s illegal to lie on the form when purchasing a firearm.

I once purchased a Glock 27 in a church parking lot. I ain’t filled out no form! I’ll do what I want 😎
Click to expand...

That's funny because I bought a Glock 23 in the parking lot of a Dicks sporting goods about 20 minutes before I ate a special gummy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill and 85SugarVol
#6,600
#6,600
Vol8188 said:
You need to go back and read exactly what I said. Hunter is on record saying he had to give his father 1/2 of his salary. That’s not speculation. You may be honestly unaware of it because CNN and MSNBC have refused to cover it, but that doesn’t make it less of a fact.
Click to expand...


Hunter Biden was a crackhead who said a lot of things---it was probably bull$hit and won't mean anything. It's unseemly for someone related to an influential public figure to take money from outsiders on the pretext of influencing decisions by the public official---but it's not illegal and of course nearly all of our politicians receive a raft of benefits regularly to influence public policy for public-interest groups.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top