The Hunter Biden Thread

#6,803
#6,803
lawgator1 said:
It is not as you describe it. You are making a lot of assumptions trying to trace dollars.

View attachment 594194
Click to expand...

Be specific. I wasn’t the one who trace this, but specific. What specifically is not as described? I’ll even add my full understanding of this timeline and you can tell me where I’m wrong:

Spring 2017: E-mail involving the infamous “10% to be held by H for the big guy” comes from Chinese company to Hunter.

July 2017: Hunter sends WhatsApp messages to the same Chinese business (on a day we know Hunter was at his dad’s house) saying he was with his dad they would use their political ties to go after him if the money agreed to wasn’t pay

Going off memory but I think it’s August 2017: money is paid to Hunter part of which goes to an account for his uncle and wife

A week or so later: Sarah Biden (the wife) writes Joe a check for exactly 10% of what Hunter Biden received.

What is not as I described and what assumptions are being made?
 
#6,807
#6,807
Vol8188 said:
Joe was in office in early 2017. He wasn’t in office for all of it. But if you follow the paper trail here you’ll find messages from Hunter asking why they haven’t paid yet (I believe those were in July) which implies the plan was to wait until he was out of office to pay. The messages also include Hunter threatening to use Joe’s political power against that company if they don’t pay and saying something to the effect of “dad is here with me and we will use all our means to come after you if you don’t follow through”.

So it’s possible Joe wasn’t selling actually influence, but at a minimum this makes him complicit in selling perceived influence like his son was.
Click to expand...
I’m all for holding these people accountable but this seems pretty weak so far, especially when you’re talking about using this as the basis for removing a sitting president. If Trump was going to be impeached for the exact same thing I think many people would be singing a different tune.

Why in hell would the GOP want to impeach and remove Biden anyway? To get to Kamala? She’s worse than Biden. That would be really stupid.
 
#6,808
#6,808
BowlBrother85 said:
What actions did Joe Biden take which were favorable to the company? You have Hunter talking a big game, but that's Hunter .... What undo influence did Joe Biden ever exert, or what favorable actions, as Vice President, did Joe Biden ever take on behalf of this company? I'm open to the possibility that could have happened, but what were they?

What was the quid-pro-quo?
Click to expand...
To be fair you sure as hell wouldn’t question anything if this were Trump. You’d be screaming from mountain high to impeach him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#6,809
#6,809
hUTch2002 said:
I’m all for holding these people accountable but this seems pretty weak so far, especially when you’re talking about using this as the basis for removing a sitting president. If Trump was going to be impeached for the exact same thing I think many people would be singing a different tune.

Why in hell would the GOP want to impeach and remove Biden anyway? To get to Kamala? She’s worse than Biden. That would be really stupid.
Click to expand...

Weak in what regard? Is there a reasonable explanation that I’m missing?
 
#6,810
#6,810

Hunter Biden Special Counsel reveals his Failure To Pay Taxes On $1 Million from Burisma could STILL be used in future criminal cases: David Weiss admits the statute of limitations expired before he could prosecute the first time​

Special Counsel David Weiss acknowledged the statute of limitations expired on Hunter Biden's failure to pay taxes on $1 million in income from Ukrainian company Burisma between 2014-2015.

But he said evidence collected during the investigation could still be used in future prosecutions against him.

The special counsel decided to give testimony behind closed doors due to ongoing speculation and accusations by IRS whistleblowers that the Hunter probe has been politicized, which he has denied.

When asked about Hunter's failure to pay taxes on over $1 million from Burisma in 2014 and 2015, Weiss told investigators he could not comment on it because it pertains to 'ongoing litigation and our outstanding investigation.'

'I’m just not at liberty to comment at this time, but there will come a time,' Weiss said according to the transcript reviewed by DailyMail.com.

'Even though the statute of limitations has lapsed?' Weiss was asked.

'Yes, yes,' said Weiss.

'When is the appropriate time to address why the statute of limitations was allowed to lapse?' Weiss was then asked.

'I’ll address it in the report, but even though the statute of limitations has lapsed and even though charges won’t be filed, if there were to be an outstanding tax prosecution, there is no reason to believe that evidence pertaining to prior years, or witnesses involved in prior years, wouldn’t be part of that litigation.'

Weiss confirmed IRS whistleblower testimony that the statue of limitations had run out on the 2014 and 2015 tax crimes.

The Judiciary Committee is currently probing whether DOJ officials slow-walked or obstructed criminal investigations into Hunter Biden.


IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, who were previously assigned to the Hunter Biden probe, previously testified that they recommended charges be brought against the president's son for tax violations but testified Weiss had been denied special counsel status and said he was 'not the deciding person' to bring charges in the case.

Hunter Biden sat on the board of Burisma from 2013 to 2018 and earned more than $11 million from the company.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Weiss: Hunter failure to pay taxes on $1M could be used in future case

Special Counsel David Weiss acknowledged the statute of limitation expired on Hunter Biden 's failure to pay taxes on $1 million in income from Ukrainian company Burisma between 2014-2015.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
#6,811
#6,811
hUTch2002 said:
I’m all for holding these people accountable but this seems pretty weak so far, especially when you’re talking about using this as the basis for removing a sitting president. If Trump was going to be impeached for the exact same thing I think many people would be singing a different tune.

Why in hell would the GOP want to impeach and remove Biden anyway? To get to Kamala? She’s worse than Biden. That would be really stupid.
Click to expand...

The Republicans would be stupid to go for the impeachment. Almost two years ago there was enough circumstantial evidence to say with near certainty Joe Biden was participating in an influence peddling scheme. People inherently understand corruption when they see it, and I think most people see it indeed.

The reason to talk about this is to expose how insincere the handwringing over Trump and his “connections” to Russia and the mere potential of a compromised president. There is real evidence of the Biden’s dirty dealing, and the excuses are hilarious. The bobbing and weaving is incredible.

We have a certain group of people here who pretended to 2-3 years to be genuinely concerned over this potential corruption. Clearly it was insincere. And the excuses, equivocations, and rationalizations for Biden exposes this certain group as frauds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88, UT_Dutchman and Vol8188
#6,813
#6,813
VOLS INC. said:
Here ya go LG. I re-wrote the story in a manner that you would find interesting.

WASHINGTON—Democrat House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman released a video and bank records memorandum revealing how Donald Trump received $40,000 in laundered Russia money from the account of his sister Elizabeth Trump, in the form of a personal check.

The money trail begins in July 2017 when Eric Trump demanded payment from his Russia linked associate. On July 30, 2017, Eric Trump sent a message to Raymond Zhao—a CEFC associate—demanding a $10 million dollar capital payment and claimed his father, Donald Trump, was sitting in the room.

On August 8, 2017, Northern International Capital, a Russia company affiliated with CEFC, sent $5 million to Hudson West III, a joint venture established by Eric Trump and a CEFC associate. That same day, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to Owasco, P.C., an entity owned and controlled by Eric Trump. On August 14, 2017, Eric Trump wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by President Trumps sister, Elizabeth Trump. On August 28, 2017, Elizabeth Trump withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group. Later the same day, she deposited it into her personal checking account. On September 3, 2017, Elizabeth Trump cut a check to Donald Trump for $40,000 for a “loan repayment.”
Click to expand...
Awesome. Very funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and VOLS INC.
#6,814
#6,814
DC_Vol said:
The Republicans would be stupid to go for the impeachment. Almost two years ago there was enough circumstantial evidence to say with near certainty Joe Biden was participating in an influence peddling scheme. People inherently understand corruption when they see it, and I think most people see it indeed.

The reason to talk about this is to expose how insincere the handwringing over Trump and his “connections” to Russia and the mere potential of a compromised president. There is real evidence of the Biden’s dirty dealing, and the excuses are hilarious. The bobbing and weaving is incredible.

We have a certain group of people here who pretended to 2-3 years to be genuinely concerned over this potential corruption. Clearly it was insincere. And the excuses, equivocations, and rationalizations for Biden exposes this certain group as frauds.
Click to expand...
I’m with you, makes sense. No doubt BB, LG and others would be absolutely losing their minds had this same thing happened with Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and UT_Dutchman
#6,817
#6,817

Special Counsel David Weiss Issuing Subpoenas in Hunter Biden Tax Investigation: Report​


A yearslong investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes may be entering a new phase as prosecutors for special counsel David Weiss gather evidence in California.

A grand jury in Los Angeles has begun issuing subpoenas to people connected to Hunter Biden’s business dealings, including James Biden, the brother of President Joe Biden, CNN reported Thursday.


The news comes shortly after the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, Martin Estrada, told Congress in a closed-door interview that Weiss had called him in September for reasons that Estrada declined to share with lawmakers, according to a transcript of the interview reviewed by the Washington Examiner.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Special counsel David Weiss issuing subpoenas in Hunter Biden tax investigation: Report

A yearslong investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes may be entering a new phase as prosecutors for special counsel David Weiss gather evidence in California.
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
 
#6,824
#6,824
Huge News guys. Hunter got a truck, daddy loaned him the money, then Hunter paid the loan back. I know that must look really suspect for all you Trumpers. I mean, what type of commie pays his loans back.

 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top