The Impeachment Thread

#38,376
#38,376
It is being reported that Trump's defense attorneys have NOT ONE TIME mentioned Bolton on the Senate floor.

Odd under the circumstances, don't you think?
 
#38,379
#38,379
lawgator1 said:
It is being reported that Trump's defense attorneys have NOT ONE TIME mentioned Bolton on the Senate floor.

Odd under the circumstances, don't you think?
Click to expand...
You should have listened to their opening remarks. They explicitly said they wouldn't address anything that wasn't presented in the congressional case against President Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#38,387
#38,387
If i work to get a check, isnt that quid pro quo? When obama threatened african nations that he would withhold if they passes pro-family laws, isnt that quid pro quo.

If trump did withold funds to investigate corruption, why is that illegal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#38,388
#38,388
happy-go_vol said:
If i work to get a check, isnt that quid pro quo? When obama threatened african nations that he would withhold if they passes pro-family laws, isnt that quid pro quo.

If trump did withold funds to investigate corruption, why is that illegal?
Click to expand...
He wasn't investigating corruption. Soliciting a foreign government for help in an election is bribery and against the law. That's why it's illegal
 
#38,389
#38,389
Velo Vol said:
I think this is more Machiavellian than Trump is capable of.

Click to expand...


What a Twit . This is just one more reason ( and there’s a lot of reasons with him ) , why the people that watch his show and believe him should be flogged .
 
#38,392
#38,392
vols40 said:
All relevant witnesses.... Eric C, Joe and Hunter Adam Schift etc
Click to expand...
Yes, all relevant witnesses. You can have the Bidens, the whistleblower, Schiff, Pelosi and Alexandra Chalupa. Just allow John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, Rick Perry, Mick Mulvaney, Rudy Giuliani, Devin Nunes, and Lev Parnas to also testify. That should satisfy everyone.
 
#38,394
#38,394
0nelilreb said:
It’s that longer battery life and the mileage you get is the huge problem . 235 miles in the city or suburbs is nice , on the road it’s nothing , and that’s at optimal battery power ( brand new ) . We all know from having smart phone really what that means .
Click to expand...

The other point that the fans of fancy golf carts ignore is that electricity doesn't just come out of the wall. Most of it is still produced with fossil fuels. Add in transmission losses, charging losses, battery age depletion, and the losses involved in the converting heat from fuel burned to electricity and you really are likely to find that burning fossil fuels directly to produce motive power is as environmentally efficient as electric cars. The big deal is where they produce the electric power - and ignore the transmission losses to get it to environmentally challenged cities. That doesn't even get into the environmental aspects of producing batteries and then dealing with spent batteries; there's really not much honesty about the real environmental costs because it's easy to ignore the environmental trash that is China.
 
#38,397
#38,397
#38,400
#38,400
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top