The Impeachment Thread

#4,027
#4,027
lawgator1 said:
Legit question.

Rudy says he was just investigating criminal activity by Biden. Trump says the same thing. Just investigating corruption.

If that is so, why transfer the transcript from one server to the secret one? Why hide it?
Click to expand...

I've been curious about and haven't heard who paid Rudy's travel expenses. Did Trump pay or did taxpayers pay?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128 and MontyPython
#4,028
#4,028
NorthDallas40 said:
Link proving your implication? What you are implying is using classified markings to mask inappropriate activity which is illegal. Prove your assertion or GTFO
Click to expand...

Read the whistleblower complaint. The one that was found credible. The one that was justified based upon interviews with other persons. And wait until those other persons testify to Congress and explain why that document was misclassified and then hidden that way.

And, the excuse that Trump himself did not play a role in that process is not going to work. He is the one who committed the original crime. The others just covered it up to protect him from his own and corrupt intent.
 
#4,029
#4,029
0nelilreb said:
He was talking about how hard they stayed on Clinton through his presidency trying to find any thing to impeach him on, he said it backfired on them .
Click to expand...

He was impeached during his final term. Eo ipso, impeachment couldn't have possibly got him reelected.
 
#4,030
#4,030
lawgator1 said:
Read the whistleblower complaint. The one that was found credible. The one that was justified based upon interviews with other persons. And wait until those other persons testify to Congress and explain why that document was misclassified and then hidden that way.

And, the excuse that Trump himself did not play a role in that process is not going to work. He is the one who committed the original crime. The others just covered it up to protect him from his own and corrupt intent.
Click to expand...
The whistleblower complaint is not proof of anything with regard to the markings of the document at time of generation. And I’m all for questioning whomever generated the transcript and upon who’s direction or standing policy determined what markings to apply. But thanks for pointing out you were FOS as usual in your assertion!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, BigOrangeD and AirVol
#4,033
#4,033
Hunerwadel said:
I've been curious about and haven't heard who paid Rudy's travel expenses. Did Trump pay or did taxpayers pay?
Click to expand...

I've been curious about who paid for John Kerry's trip to Iran when Trump didn't send him there to talk to those air-headed idiot Muhlahs on their nuclear go-ahead-and-make-your-bomb deal.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, BigOrangeD and AirVol
#4,034
#4,034
NorthDallas40 said:
So there is an ongoing implication that this was Trump’s lawyers... Rudy, Sekulow etc... it was not. It was NSC lawyers whom directed this. And the markings on the document dictate where they are stored and the NSC was acting appropriately. And every classified document has an itemized number and it’s exact location is known at all times. Anybody who knows anything about handling classified info laughs at this whole dialog.
Click to expand...
Well, give them some credit for being stewpid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#4,035
#4,035
NorthDallas40 said:
It was initiated by the lawsuit filed by Paula Jones in 1994 and dragged on for four years prior to initiation of formal impeachment proceedings. Womp womp.
Click to expand...

What do mean it was "initiated" by the Paula Jones case in 1994? That'd be like saying the Stormy Daniels case against Trump started his impeachment proceedings if one of the impeachment counts against Trump is ultimately based on his Stormy Daniels payoff.
 
#4,037
#4,037
evillawyer said:
What do mean it was "initiated" by the Paula Jones case in 1994? That'd be like saying the Stormy Daniels case against Trump started his impeachment proceedings if one of the impeachment counts against Trump is ultimately based on his Stormy Daniels payoff.
Click to expand...
Oh ffs stop parsing words to deflect from your dipshit post. The whole issue began with Paula Jones lawsuit. The swirl built for four years in very gawdy public fashion. And it culminated in impeachment proceedings in 1998. Womp womp again.
 
#4,038
#4,038
NorthDallas40 said:
Oh ffs stop parsing words to deflect from your dipshit post. The whole issue began with Paula Jones lawsuit. The swirl built for four years in very gawdy public fashion. And it culminated in impeachment proceedings in 1998. Womp womp again.
Click to expand...

Thanks Cap'n Obtuse!
 
#4,040
#4,040
NorthDallas40 said:
You’re welcome girl. Glad we straightened out your post was FOS as usual.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's super clear that a private state court civil lawsuit in which the House of Representatives is not involved in any way shape or form constitutes the beginning of the impeachment proceedings.

 
#4,041
#4,041
evillawyer said:
Yes, it's super clear that a private state court civil lawsuit in which the House of Representatives is not involved in any way shape or form constitutes the beginning of the impeachment proceedings.

Click to expand...

LMFAO! You’re still parsing words!! You can’t let it go that Lindsay was correct in his assertion and you were wrong in your assertion. It all started with the civil proceedings of Paula Jones lawsuit and that’s a fact! Now try to debate that Clinton didn’t act to delay it until he left office and it went all the way to the Supreme Court ruling that it could proceed 🤣
 
#4,042
#4,042
These GOP senators and representatives would be better served by shaving their butts and mooning the camera. It would at least make clear what they're talking out of.

 
#4,043
#4,043
NorthDallas40 said:
LMFAO! You’re still parsing words!! You can’t let it go that Lindsay was correct in his assertion and you were wrong in your assertion. It all started with the civil proceedings of Paula Jones lawsuit and that’s a fact! Now try to debate that Clinton didn’t act to delay it until he left office and it went all the way to the Supreme Court ruling that it could proceed 🤣
Click to expand...

Cap'n Obtuse, go read the original quote that started this. You're only making it more obvious why I've correctly dubbed you Cap'n Obtuse.
 
#4,044
#4,044
NorthDallas40 said:
Link proving your implication? What you are implying is using classified markings to mask inappropriate activity which is illegal. Prove your assertion or GTFO
Click to expand...

Per Fox News:

"A senior Trump administration official acknowledged Friday that White House lawyers directed moving the transcript of President Trump’s July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to a highly secure system."

Trump official says lawyers had Ukraine call transcript moved to secure system
 
#4,046
#4,046
MontyPython said:
Per Fox News:

"A senior Trump administration official acknowledged Friday that White House lawyers directed moving the transcript of President Trump’s July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to a highly secure system."
Click to expand...
We’ve been over this before. It’s STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES you dolt. Same as any other Prez has done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top