Velo Vol
Internets Expert
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 36,853
- Likes
- 17,289
Anyone taking up arms to defend that clown deserves what they get. Trump is all about Trump. That's it and there really is no substanceWhen you boil it down, the only thing the whole rah rah MAGA thing really stands for is . . . Trump. That's the only "principle" at stake.
The angry ramblings of a helpless, frustrated man. Sad.
If the opposition party are corrupt, it's his job to use the powers of the presidency to go after them. I don't see you wetting yourself that the Senate Dems are using the power of the senate to go after him.That he's using the powers of the presidency to go after the opposition party
Unverified? The transcript of the July 25th phone call shows Trump soliciting Zelensky for assistance with investigating the Bidens. That is exactly what the whistleblower said it would show in the complaint.Besides unverified, second-hand accusations and massive conjecture, exactly what "behavior" has been brought to light? Or did you mean Schiff fabricating a fictitious conversation as a soundbite?
Unverified? The transcript of the July 25th phone call shows Trump soliciting Zelensky for assistance with investigating the Bidens. That is exactly what the whistleblower said it would show in the complaint.
Trump is guilty of an abuse of power and a very clear conflict of interest. He withheld military aid from the Ukraine days before this phone call and then during the call said, "I would like you to do us a favor though..." and then proceeded to enlist Zelensky's help with digging up dirt on a potential opponent.So?
And the whistleblower claimed that Trump was threatening them, which the transcript doesn't show.
But again... What if Trump encouraged them to investigate? Running for President doesn't make you immune to being investigated. And being political rivals doesn't abstain Trump from being the head of the DoJ with a sworn oath to see crimes investigated and laws enforced.
So?
And the whistleblower claimed that Trump was threatening them, which the transcript doesn't show.
But again... What if Trump encouraged them to investigate? Running for President doesn't make you immune to being investigated. And being political rivals doesn't abstain Trump from being the head of the DoJ with a sworn oath to see crimes investigated and laws enforced.
Prior to the August 12 filing date. And I think that because this CIA person fits the type on the yearly training we get to identify subversive people. No Iām not labeling him a spy. Iām saying the attributes are similar. The person has expressed political animus thatās a given. Based on what he does for a living Iām gonna guess he/she fits the mold on believing rules donāt apply to them either. Thatās two check marks. So they act outside the lines and get the complaint info to Schitt. Now the cogs are conveniently turning to get the complaint formally logged and into the public screech fest?Why do you think Schiff had the complaint prior to September 23 or whatever?
LOLTrump is guilty of an abuse of power and a very clear conflict of interest. He withheld military aid from the Ukraine days before this phone call and then during the call said, "I would like you to do us a favor though..." and then proceeded to enlist Zelensky's help with digging up dirt on a potential opponent.
And where in the whistleblower complaint does he say that Trump was threatening them? Threatening who? What are you talking about?
Trump is guilty of investigating your guy. Period.Trump is guilty of an abuse of power and a very clear conflict of interest. He withheld military aid from the Ukraine days before this phone call and then during the call said, "I would like you to do us a favor though..." and then proceeded to enlist Zelensky's help with digging up dirt on a potential opponent.
And where in the whistleblower complaint does he say that Trump was threatening them? Threatening who? What are you talking about?
Prior to the August 12 filing date. And I think that because this CIA person fits the type on the yearly training we get to identify subversive people. No Iām not labeling him a spy. Iām saying the attributes are similar. The person has expressed political animus thatās a given. Based on what he does for a living Iām gonna guess he/she fits the mold on believing rules donāt apply to them either. Thatās two check marks. So they act outside the lines and get the complaint info to Schitt. Now the cogs are conveniently turning to get the complaint formally logged and into the public screech fest?
"Federal law prohibits a foreign national from directly or indirectly making a ācontribution or donation of money or other thing of valueā in connection with a U.S. election, and prohibits a person from soliciting, accepting or receiving such a contribution or donation from a foreign national. Federal law defines ācontributionā to include āany gift ā¦ of money or anything of value made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office.ā And the FEC by regulation defines āsolicitā to mean āto ask, request, or recommend, explicitly or implicitly, that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value.ā
From https://www.justsecurity.org/66277/the-quid-is-a-crime-no-need-to-prove-pro-quo-in-ukrainegate/
That is not true. The military aid was withheld just a few days before the call even though it had already been approved by Congress. It was discussed during the call. Zelensky specifically mentions the Javelins. That is when Trump goes into the "I would like you to do us a favor though..." spill.Trump is guilty of investigating your guy. Period.
He withheld military aid well before the call, never mentioned the aid in the call, and the Ukraine didn't know the aid had been withheld until over a month after the call.
Look it up.
So, again... Besides undocumented, second-hand testimony, Schiff's fictitious Senate propaganda-planting, and your pearl-clutching... What behavior?