The Impeachment Thread

#4,407
#4,407
Orange_Crush said:
He's the chief law enforcement officer's chief and has the right to make anyone he * well pleases an investigator. As the President, he has the right to interact with foreign heads of state, and I'll need you to quote chapter and verse of the constitution that forbids he recommend they investigate corruption on/from their end.
Click to expand...

The president has powers the Constitution confers upon him. He does not have any power not forbidden by the Constitution.

He appoints someone to run the Department of Justice. That institution is designed to be independent. The FBI's term is ten years, precisely to minimize political influence.

We've endured 2.5 years of crazy "Obama is going to get arrested for investigating Trump" conspiracy theories here. Why don't you do us all a favor and tell this thread a president can put criminal investigations on anyone he wants?

Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ
 
#4,409
#4,409
NorthDallas40 said:
They need to interview everybody. The whistleblower, the sources, the Situation Room scribes, all of them.
Click to expand...


Yup.

And they need to be given the call transcripts with Putin and Saudi leadership that were also misclassified and moved to the other computer system. Also need to see any notes or documentation that alludes to Ukraine, military aid to Ukraine, and instructions to Rudy or to Barr or anyone else as to negotiating release of the funds.

Rudy needs to be put under oath, too. And someone needs to explain to him what that means.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#4,410
#4,410
volfanjustin said:
No they don't, they need to put this hoax in a category with all the others we've had for 2.5 years.
Click to expand...
Yeah at this point they actually do. The fact is, if the provided transcript was altered that’s a problem. Thus far there has been zero information indicating it is not original, however that needs to be put to rest.
 
#4,411
#4,411
lawgator1 said:
Yup.

And they need to be given the call transcripts with Putin and Saudi leadership that were also misclassified and moved to the other computer system. Also need to see any notes or documentation that alludes to Ukraine, military aid to Ukraine, and instructions to Rudy or to Barr or anyone else as to negotiating release of the funds.

Rudy needs to be put under oath, too. And someone needs to explain to him what that means.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Nope. You idiots don’t get to use this fiasco to create open reign on all transcripts. That will be fought all the way to SCOTUS and you will lose.
 
#4,412
#4,412
NorthDallas40 said:
After watching yourself being obtuse yesterday while screeching your obtuse mantra I’ll sit tight I think I’m good lady.
Click to expand...

Haha. You mean the one where you defended the statement that the GOP's decision to pursue impeachment in 1998 led to Bill Clinton's reelection in 1994?
 
#4,413
#4,413
NorthDallas40 said:
That was a portion of the ICIG report.
Click to expand...

Not exactly what the IG said, but I take your meaning.

Seems like you’re repurposing credibility arguments into a conspiracy to try to overcome the fact that so much has been corroborated.

Needs more connection to Schiff.
 

Attachments

  • 8908BF9D-6208-48B0-8BC1-098F434EA260.png
    8908BF9D-6208-48B0-8BC1-098F434EA260.png
    805.3 KB · Views: 3
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#4,414
#4,414
evillawyer said:
Haha. You mean the one where you defended the statement that the GOP's decision to pursue impeachment in 1998 led to Bill Clinton's reelection in 1994?
Click to expand...
No I mean the one where you parsed words and multiple people pointed out you were parsing words while ignoring the message in Linday’s statement which we’ve all said before. You know just basically being obtuse.
 
#4,415
#4,415
NorthDallas40 said:
Nope. You idiots don’t get to use this fiasco to create open reign on all transcripts. That will be fought all the way to SCOTUS and you will lose.
Click to expand...

Awww, gee, why does that worry you so much? Surely, there is no reason for you or Trump to be worried about all of his perfect calls, right?

Right?


tenor.gif
 
#4,417
#4,417
RockyTop85 said:
Not exactly what the IG said, but I take your meaning.

Seems like you’re repurposing credibility arguments into a conspiracy to try to overcome the fact that so much has been corroborated.

Needs more connection to Schiff.
Click to expand...
I don’t disagree that it needs to connection to Schitt. I predicated my whole statement to you that it was speculation 🤷‍♂️ This person thus far fits the mold though based on the info beaten into us yearly. That was what got me thinking on it over the weekend.

If this individual was soliciting second hand knowledge on classified information where I work I would have turned their ass in in a New York minute. Fact.
 
#4,418
#4,418
lawgator1 said:
Awww, gee, why does that worry you so much? Surely, there is no reason for you or Trump to be worried about all of his perfect calls, right?

Right?


tenor.gif
Click to expand...
I’m not worried at all. In fact I can’t wait to see you idiots get this thrown back at you. And it will be. I repeat. LMAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#4,419
#4,419
NorthDallas40 said:
They need to interview everybody. The whistleblower, the sources, the Situation Room scribes, all of them.
Click to expand...

Yes. Let's get to the bottom of any potential malfeasance, but if the accusations are correct Trump should put the country first for once and resign.

I frankly don't understand the frantic scrambling for any rock to hold onto at this point by the POTUS and his backers.

The reality is:

1) Every president is going to get threats of impeachment in the current partisan divide. No need to overreact.

2) No President will ever be removed by the Senate, as they will simply resign like Nixon did once the votes are mustered.

3) The Democrats don't have the votes to remove Trump in the first place.

If Trump didn't act like a such a fragile little snowflake his "nothing to see here" game would be pretty easy to pull off, but that he is so extraordinarily weak makes me wonder why does the GOP need
this albatross around their necks any longer.
 
Last edited:
#4,422
#4,422
Rifleman said:
Yes. Let's get to the bottom of any potential malfeasance, but if the accusations are correct Trump should put the country first for once and resign.

I frankly don't understand the frantic scrambling for any rock to hold onto at this point by the POTUS and his backers.

The reality is:

1) Every president is going to get threats of impeachment in the current partisan divide. No need to overreact.

2) No President will ever be removed by the Senate, as they will simply resign like Nixon did once the votes are mustered.

3) The Democrats don't have the votes to remove Trump in the first place.

If Trump didn't act like a such a fragile little snowflake his "nothing to see here" game would be pretty easy to pull off, but that he is so extraordinarily weak makes me wonder why does the GOP needs this albatross around their necks any longer.
Click to expand...
I don’t take issue with any of your three points. And I’ve said multiple times I wish Trump would forget his damn Twitter login.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#4,423
#4,423
evillawyer said:
These are your words:

"Actually Lindsey has admitted the GOP screwed up trying to impeach Clinton ( last year I believe ) and said they should have never done it , said it’s what got bill re-elected."
Click to expand...

That’s what he said , I also in my next post ( context matters always ) was talking about staying on him through this presidency trying to find things to impeach him with .
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#4,424
#4,424
evillawyer said:
These are your words:

"Actually Lindsey has admitted the GOP screwed up trying to impeach Clinton ( last year I believe ) and said they should have never done it , said it’s what got bill re-elected."
Click to expand...
Yes they are. And he and I both explained multiple times their exact meaning. You immediately latched onto the act of impeachment while ignoring that Lindsay has stated multiple times as have we the whole fiasco from the Jones lawsuit thru actual House impeachment was folly. Because... well you’re obtuse 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
#4,425
#4,425
I think I've got an idea what went down with the firing of Shokin. Remember the Ukrainians had no problem with him and even said firing him was to get the money for the good of the country.
I think that Hunter reached out to his Dad that the prosecutor's office wouldn't work with Burisma to pay a fine to make the case go away...rumors of a bribe is one of the reasons they are looking to reopen the case. So Biden and Obama withhold the billion until the guy was fired a clear Quid Pro Quo There are memos and affidavits that show that Shokin wasnt corrupt just the poor guy caught in between a country that needed money and a huge company who wanted an investigation to go away. All the memos are available at the link Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
 

Attachments

  • 20190930_103022.jpg
    20190930_103022.jpg
    172.2 KB · Views: 2
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top