Orangeburst
Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 47,327
- Likes
- 108,235
“
Now use your brain, and tell us the difference between what you just posted, and claiming most of the polls said she would win in a landslide.“
That’s why predictive models at sites like FiveThirtyEight, the Upshot and the Huffington Post (despite differences in assumptions and how they’re built) all give Clinton a win probability over 50 percent (64 percent, 84 percent and 98.1 percent, respectively)
“
They are the useful idiots. *******ed dumbasses with a complicit media. **** em.
Big ****in deal. You and your *******ned tweets and analysis.
I DGAF what Trump does now as long as he is kicking liberal lying ass.
And now for a live video feed where @Orangeburst65 tells us all the reasons he doesn’t care and definitely is not triggered by this story:Why don't you FO little boy.
And now for a live video feed where @Orangeburst65 tells us all the reasons he doesn’t care and definitely is not triggered by this story:
View attachment 226671
Oh. Well. Ok. It seems we’re having some technical difficulties. We’ll try to hear from him later.
Polls , Models... they are related. Point is there were multiple PROJECTIONS that had Hillary big.
It was certainly still the sentiment in the days leading up to the election, as well as election night.The polls narrowed as her support diminished, especially after Comey reopened the investigation into HRC in October 2016. On or about the election - the polls were deadly accurate. She wasn't projected to "landslide" anywhere near the election, those facebook memes you saw were clearly misinforming.
It was certainly still the sentiment in the days leading up to the election, as well as election night.
Many of the models still had her convincingly, and many of the network and cable prognosticators were quite confident.