The Impeachment Thread

[VolnJC]

It's all starting to make sense.. Susan Rice flunkies and Obama NSC leftover is the whistleblower Dems were investigating Manafort and Trump during election using Ukraine to piece together Russia collusion
http://archive.is/JLK0t

 

[Orangeburst]

High crimes and misdemeanors.

Not because "he won and we don't like it!"

One of our resident lawyers the other day was arguing it could be political reasons as it was a political process. Scary stuff.

 

[37L1]

Glad to see you support the impeachment.

You need glasses, no wait, a guide dog and a cane.

 

[VolnJC]

 

[VolnJC]

This is long but good reading to learn more about the whistleblower and the problem Trump had with Obama leftovers and leakers
https://4liberty.org.uk/2018/04/15/trumps-reshuffle-the-mcmaster-chronicles-part-2/

 

[BigOrangeD]

Mass Media Panic: Barr & Durham in Italy


DECLASSIFIED - The Epoch Times

Published on Oct 3, 2019
Full-blown panic ensued in the fake news media when it was announced that U.S. Attorney General William Barr was in Italy meeting with government officials about the role of Italian intelligence in what has become popularly known as “Russiagate,” the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

 

[Grand Vol]

It's not an argument to say X shouldn't be impeached because he won an election.

Duh. Every president won an election.

It's not because a President won an election.

It's because HE won the election. Impeachment attempts started even before he was in office because, frankly, he won. What other reason did they have for impeachment before he was in office?

 

[37L1]

It's not because a President won an election.

It's because HE won the election. Impeachment attempts started even before he was in office because, frankly, he won. What other reason did they have for impeachment before he was in office?

An insurance plan?

 

[Grand Vol]

One of our resident lawyers the other day was arguing it could be political reasons as it was a political process. Scary stuff.

Impeachment is a political process as well as a trial despite what RT85 has to say on the matter. When a body of people determines guilt or innocence based on testimony and evidence presented, that's called a trial.

As for the "political reasons" that's fairly apparent.

 

[hog88]

No, it's because they want the case to be as strong as possible when they put Republicans on the record about it.

Trump is getting impeached. We already have enough democrats in favor. It's just about making the public see how many Republicans are willing to turn on him and how many are willing to strap themselves to a suicide bomber.

I hope you are right.

 

[Septic]

RINO

Ben must have decided not to seek reelection. Thus far, only the ones who have no need to suck up to dotard are the ones willing to call a spade a spade.

 

[MontyPython]

You need glasses, no wait, a guide dog and a cane.

My sight is fine. I see a President extorting a foreign country with my tax money for his political gain. Not rocket science. If you can't see that, well, that's on you.

 

[Grand Vol]

No, it's because they want the case to be as strong as possible when they put Republicans on the record about it.

Trump is getting impeached. We already have enough democrats in favor. It's just about making the public see how many Republicans are willing to turn on him and how many are willing to strap themselves to a suicide bomber.

This post makes me chuckle.

 

[Grand Vol]

My sight is fine. I see a President extorting a foreign country with my tax money for his political gain. Not rocket science. If you can't see that, well, that's on you.

Is that a high crime or misdemeanor?

 

[37L1]

My sight is fine. I see a President extorting a foreign country with my tax money for his political gain. Not rocket science. If you can't see that, well, that's on you.

You don't see GV supporting impeachment, but you say you do, so what are we to conclude. Probably Jennifer says it best:

 

[hog88]

You don't see GV supporting impeachment, but you say you do, so what are we to conclude. Probably Jennifer says it best:

I support impeachment.

 

[37L1]

I support impeachment.

Who asked you?

 

[NorthDallas40]

“We didn’t like the message their version presented so we released our obviously better version but you’re still not getting the whole unedited version. You’re welcome”

 

[Grand Vol]

I support impeachment.

I support the process, absolutely.

Because, again, Democrats have the attention span of goldfish and can't think past 20 seconds to see if something might not turn out the way they want.

 

[hog88]

Who asked you?

Well nobody but I like to be a buttinski every now and again.

 

[37L1]

I support the process, absolutely.

Because, again, Democrats have the attention span of goldfish and can't think past 20 seconds to see if something might not turn out the way they want.

You need to apologize to all the goldfish you just offended.

 

[hog88]

I support the process, absolutely.

Because, again, Democrats have the attention span of goldfish and can't think past 20 seconds to see if something might not turn out the way they want.

I support it because once the impeachment hearings begin everything is open. No more closed door hearings, open testimony with witnesses called and questioned.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I support impeachment.

It’s beyond time for a formal House impeachment inquiry vote! Even the WH supports it too!

 

[zeppelin128]

Nothing official yet
Check out Jack Posobiec, Twttter PhD (@JackPosobiec): Jack Posobiec, Twttter PhD (@JackPosobiec) | Twitter
He seems like he knows the guy and that name is coming up alot in searches now

Have the Q boys found a new name already? I thought they dropped thr whistleblower's name and solved all this earlier this week?

I can't believe they'd change up their story so quickly.

 

[RockyTop85]

Too long and too much wrong to respond to all of it. I’m gonna sort though it, omit all the stuff that doesn’t make any sense or isn’t relevant and just respond to the stuff that does:

condescending remarks are barely not worth addressing.

FYP.
Good point. I agree.

I already considered Trump's responses and condemned them for not only the reasons you are remarking upon. We agree here. Not only do they have a negative effect on someone coming forward, it is poor boorish behavior...

Ok. Done. I guess there’s a chance I missed something, but pretty safe to assume I disagree with everything else you said (quick now’s your chance to edit the post and say something it would be embarrassing to disagree with!)

Have a good day.