evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
No, actually I'm not familiar with that. Please provide specifics on Presidents that have bribed foreign countries with taxpayer money to investigate political opponents.
I pointed this hypocrisy out earlier by standing two blatant posts, made by the same poster, within minutes of one another. Crickets. The liberals know they are supporting an unconstitutional coup.Since I finally have the opportunity to respond effectively...
You still have yet to prove President Trump actually withheld funds for a "bribery" to get them to investigate Biden. When you can do that, your idea will have merit.
Now, plenty of past Presidents have withheld aid from countries that were corrupt or had principles they didn't like or human right violations or whatever. Your side has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt this was done for purely political purposes to get them to investigate Biden. Which it can't do. So, we fall back on "corruption" as the reason for the funds being withheld.
Now, my issue with you and the rest of your mouthbreathers is your extremely hypocritical stance on Biden and associates. You have zero desire to see if the allegations of influence swaying are true and care more about taking down Trump than anything. You could care less if the Vice President (even after he admitted it) had anything to do with calling off that prosecutor than you do with your maniacal obsession of Trump.
Don't you want justice? Or only justice when it comes to Trump and forget the rest because they align with your political philosophy?
No, Presidents have withheld aid from nations before when they didn't align with their values.
A 2nd whistleblower? Keep hope alive Dems! This might be the one!!!!!
I pointed this hypocrisy out earlier by standing two blatant posts, made by the same poster, within minutes of one another. Crickets. The liberals know they are supporting an unconstitutional coup.
They don't see it as a coup. They twist it every way they can to justify the end result. Basically, it amounts to "Orange Man Bad."
IKR?
Just wait until he starts bombing other countries to divert people's attention.
I didn't vote for Trump because I think he's a slimy creep that I just can't drop a pebble in favor of. I never wanted him.Lol, you wanted a TV reality show star that is more concerned with tough guy optics than substance. Congratulations America, you got what you paid for.
Why would you be surprised?
**** it, burn it down.
Like oc said, the rule of law is out the window.
I don't think anyone is surprised that electing a carnival barker has resulted in America turning into a banana republic.
Its on the table, fo' sho. Iran is one bad headline away from getting leveled. And that's only because he can't bomb Pelosi, the lamestream media, the deep state, Schiff, Schumer, the whistle-blower(s), pocahontas or any of the other thousand boogeymen he gets his idiot cult members to rally against.
The other day I had an inquiry for catalyst from a lady just finishing a post-doc at an Ivy League school and soon starting to teach Chemistry at a large university in the northeast...Too much ... I even managed academic and disciplinary probation at the same time once. I decided I really detested college at the time, finished up my probationary time, quit in my junior year, and joined the Army. I did come back to UT (in time for the great Bill Battle decline) and finish up with a BS and MS in Engineering ... by that time my dislike for academia was again running rampant so a PhD was absolutely out of the question.