BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 26,441
- Likes
- 20,446
This is so ignorant. A special counsel would only be appointed in a case involving allegations of wrongdoing by a sitting President or Attorney General. Otherwise, a criminal prosecutor would have jurisdiction. It doesn't appear as though the Department of Justice (Barr, specifically) has anything on Biden. Trump wouldn't have been probing Zelensky so hard, if they did.
Yes, Iran would have been awarded more than that by a tribunal. The bottom line is, we took money from them and never delivered on what it was for.... and you are making a big deal over what time of the day the plane landed. LOL! That is ridiculous.Uh huh, and how much did Iran owe us for an embassy, staff taken hostage, a few killings, etc? One "good" turn deserves another. About that tribunal, how long had it been with no action by a pariah state? A terrorist state is going to win in court after doing what Iran has done? On what basis? Why the urgency to deliver the money in the middle of the night in cash like something out of the mafia days? Sorry, calling BS. And I think the correct term is YGBSM.
Obama is no longer a sitting President. Therefore, a criminal prosecutor (Attorney General, William Barr) would have jurisdiction. No special counsel appointment would be necessary. You are revealing quite a bit of ignorance on this topic.Ahh gotcha You said a special investigation wasn’t warranted unless a sitting president committed or was suspected of crimes.
A sitting president did in Obama and the Russia hoax. We deserve to get to the bottom of those crimes.
It has been explained countless times on here why that was done... it was Iran's money plus over 30 years of interest. They had purchased military airplane parts just prior to the 1979 hostage crisis that were never delivered. Had it gone to an international tribunal, they would have been awarded more than what they received.
...and what Trump was expecting in return, was not of benefit to the United States, it was to benefit his own reelection campaign.
No, that's when you should have questioned the Bush Administration. The CIA wasn't pushing the war, it was the Bush admin going around the world to drum up support to invade Iraq on one person's account that was never corroborated that was ultimately proven BS. That's like taking the Steele dossier as truth to invade a country to feed the haliburtons and blackwater princes.I think the Iraq war is enough for every citizen to question the CIA
Obama is no longer a sitting President. Therefore, a criminal prosecutor (Attorney General, William Barr) would have jurisdiction. No special counsel appointment would be necessary. You are revealing quite a bit of ignorance on this topic.
Furthermore, a member of the Bush Administration (Scooter Libby) went as far as exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative (Valerie Plame) because her husband (diplomat Joe Wilson) disclosed in an op-ed to the New York Times that on the basis of his "experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war," that he had "little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."No, that's when you should have questioned the Bush Administration. The CIA wasn't pushing the war, it was the Bush admin going around the world to drum up support to invade Iraq on one person's account that was never corroborated that was ultimately proven BS. That's like taking the Steele dossier as truth to invade a country to feed the haliburtons and blackwater princes.
Yeah... I'm sure that your grand plan of ignorantly promoting a full special counsel investigation into an American citizen was a trap all along... *cue the Admiral Akbar gif from Return of the Jedi*Thank you for legitimizing AG Barr and his current investigation into the origins of the Russia Hoax lol . Exactly what I was leading you towards. I just didn’t think you’d say it.