The Impeachment Thread

#7,602
#7,602
Stew Cook said:
It's a matter.of principal if not politics at this point. Trump said he would release them, if he were not under audit. I suppose that may not be a barrier after all.

I don't know what's in there, or if there is any value, but apparently we may know soon.
Click to expand...

If we want to go through the machinations to force all elected politicians at the federal level to surrender tax records as a requirement for election, then I suppose you can't argue with the requirement - they always have the right not to run; but up until then, our laws including the Constitution should protect the right to privacy. If you are certain in your position that the person has done something illegal that his taxes will show, then without requirements as a condition to running for office, he has a constitutional right not to self incriminate by giving up his tax information. If you are fishing; then go fish ... somewhere else. Further, if any candidate actually did something wrong, why would the IRS not have found it? Personally I'd be far more interested in someone's earnings while in public office than before being in public office because one place is supposedly more restrictive than the other.
 
#7,603
#7,603
tvolsfan said:
I’ll give you a hint. The “official impeachment inquiry vote” is just a talking point. It doesn’t actually exist. The full house doesn’t have to vote to authorize anything other then whether or not to adopt the inevitable articles of impeachment, which they will.
Click to expand...
Here is a hint. When your whistleblower contradicts a transcript and your congressman uses parody your side is weak

So I say bring it on. It went fantastically last time you tried this crap. Remember Mueller?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolnJC
#7,604
#7,604
tvolsfan said:
I’ll give you a hint. The “official impeachment inquiry vote” is just a talking point. It doesn’t actually exist. The full house doesn’t have to vote to authorize anything other then whether or not to adopt the inevitable articles of impeachment, which they will.
Click to expand...

Shhh man, it was fun watching them whine about a "vote."
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#7,605
#7,605
Jxn Vol said:
Here is a hint. When your whistleblower contradicts a transcript and your congressman uses parody your side is weak

So I say bring it on. It went fantastically last time you tried this crap. Remember Mueller?
Click to expand...

I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re a child, and that’s why the propaganda has been so effective on you.
 
#7,606
#7,606
Jxn Vol said:
Here is a hint. When your whistleblower contradicts a transcript and your congressman uses parody your side is weak

So I say bring it on. It went fantastically last time you tried this crap. Remember Mueller?
Click to expand...

Trump is his own whistleblower, champ. The CIA guys are simply corroborating Don's story. This is the plot-twist you missed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#7,607
#7,607
NorthDallas40 said:
So this article is asking the same questions I did before. It’s the timeline of the forms update. And let’s face it the ICIG messaging during this whole process has been 3 Stooges like. Clamming up now is just further escalation and bringing Curly Joe into the mix.
Click to expand...

I never liked Curly Joe that well - Curly was a lot better. "Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk"
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#7,608
#7,608
tvolsfan said:
I’ll give you a hint. The “official impeachment inquiry vote” is just a talking point. It doesn’t actually exist. The full house doesn’t have to vote to authorize anything other then whether or not to adopt the inevitable articles of impeachment, which they will.
Click to expand...
Good. What’s taking so long?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#7,609
#7,609
AM64 said:
If we want to go through the machinations to force all elected politicians at the federal level to surrender tax records as a requirement for election, then I suppose you can't argue with the requirement - they always have the right not to run; but up until then, our laws including the Constitution should protect the right to privacy. If you are certain in your position that the person has done something illegal that his taxes will show, then without requirements as a condition to running for office, he has a constitutional right not to self incriminate by giving up his tax information. If you are fishing; then go fish ... somewhere else. Further, if any candidate actually did something wrong, why would the IRS not have found it? Personally I'd be far more interested in someone's earnings while in public office than before being in public office because one place is supposedly more restrictive than the other.
Click to expand...
The requirement makes sense to implemented. However in the case of a state requesting in an investigation, it has been shown, up until this point, that he's required to do so.

I believe the courts will rule the same way with the congressional request.

Making them public is a different story.

So, if and when they are turned over, some will undoubtedly say it's an abuse of the law, although it technically is not.
 
Last edited:
#7,615
#7,615
Dims are so dumb they have to trot out another whistleblower. News flash to the idiots!!!! WE HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE F’king CALL. Doesn’t matter how many you bring out, lmao. What a bunch of whiny asses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and BigOrangeD
#7,616
#7,616
tvolsfan said:
I’ll give you a hint. The “official impeachment inquiry vote” is just a talking point. It doesn’t actually exist. The full house doesn’t have to vote to authorize anything other then whether or not to adopt the inevitable articles of impeachment, which they will.
Click to expand...

Well, there you go again. Now it's like the pirates' code ... just more of a suggestion? Dims and 5 year olds are just alike when playing games - make up the rules as you go, but application is flexible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#7,619
#7,619
AirVol said:
Dims are so dumb they have to trot out another whistleblower. News flash to the idiots!!!! WE HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE F’king CALL. Doesn’t matter how many you bring out, lmao. What a bunch of whiny asses.
Click to expand...

We do? Cite your source.

Hint: The memo the WH offered up as Cliffs notes is not a "transcript".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman, zeppelin128 and tvolsfan
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top