- Joined
- Oct 31, 2004
- Messages
- 32,633
- Likes
- 39,114
An investigation of Burisma, but not of Hunter Biden. That seems like an important distinction.
Therefore, the relevance of what he was paid or not paid is missing.
Even then, it's simply an investigation - no evidence of actual wrongdoing by the firm or more importantly for our purposes, of him. Is the theory of where there's smoke there's fire? I'd think the red hats would want to steer far clear of that argument.
Last edited: