The Impeachment Thread

[Stew Cook]

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you with the law and order president

I find it interesting that he still insists he wasn't going to make any money, but then starts complaining about his own decision to not take a salary.

 

[lawgator1]

I find it interesting that he still insists he wasn't going to make any money, but then starts complaining about his own decision to not take a salary.

He's bragging. As usual.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

There goes the libs false narrative again lol...baaa sheep baaa for us

 

[VolnJC]

There goes the libs false narrative again lol...baaa sheep baaa for us

Exactly I've pointed out that many on here want to impeach the guy who was looking into the crimes by the previous admin...and oh by the way the VP who admitted the Quid pro quo on camera is leading the Dem field you can't get more hypocritical than that

 

[tvolsfan]

Exactly I've pointed out that many on here want to impeach the guy who was looking into the crimes by the previous admin...and oh by the way the VP who admitted the Quid pro quo on camera is leading the Dem field you can't get more hypocritical than that

The obvious difference is that quid pro quo had nothing to do with his own political career or taking down a rival candidate.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

The obvious difference is that quid pro quo had nothing to do with his own political career or taking down a rival candidate.

Except joe admitted it on tape and said here call Oboma lol nice try

 

[tvolsfan]

Except joe admitted it on tape and said here call Oboma lol nice try

You seem to have badly misunderstood my post. Try again.

 

[VolnJC]

The obvious difference is that quid pro quo had nothing to do with his own political career or taking down a rival candidate.

Of course you can't have a Quid pro quo if the other side doesn't know about it and the Ukrainians have said multiple times that they didn't even know the funds were held up.. and btw the transcript doesn't say anything about a Quid pro quo..he said do us a favor and look into the 2016 election. A election that the Ukrainians colluded with the Dems to influence...President Trump had every right to hold it up...hell I would have cancelled it altogether

 

[Stew Cook]

Exactly I've pointed out that many on here want to impeach the guy who was looking into the crimes by the previous admin...and oh by the way the VP who admitted the Quid pro quo on camera is leading the Dem field you can't get more hypocritical than that

Gaetz, he seems short on details, as usual. Baaaa

So, Biden said, "You won't get aid unless you stop investigating Burisma"? Even if he had, and he didn't.. that is not asking for an investigation of your political opposition, as Trump did.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

You seem to have badly misunderstood my post. Try again.

Oops my bad many apologies

 

[Hunerwadel]

Of course you can't have a Quid pro quo if the other side doesn't know about it and the Ukrainians have said multiple times that they didn't even know the funds were held up.. and btw the transcript doesn't say anything about a Quid pro quo..he said do us a favor and look into the 2016 election. A election that the Ukrainians colluded with the Dems to influence...President Trump had every right to hold it up...hell I would have cancelled it altogether

There's a lot of acrobatics going on out there. If course the administration is a circus complete with a clown.

 

[zeppelin128]

The obvious difference is that quid pro quo had nothing to do with his own political career or taking down a rival candidate.

After 451 pages I'm not sure how many times I've said this exact same thing. But it is still "muh Biden! muh Obama! muh Hillary! muh!" followed by some opinion Tweets from some far right dudes on Fox News and Breitbart "proving" the imminent fall of the Deep State librulz which will lead to all of them heading to the gallows. It has been the same thing for days now. There is no dead horse left to beat; we are down to the bedrock now, and the sticks keep breaking, but they keep beating with them anyways.

 

[VolnJC]

OAN first network to name whistleaker

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

OAN first network to name whistleaker

Hell, everybody knows this...........this ain't nothing new at all....

 

[volinsd]

Surely today is the day, right????

 

[Septic]

OAN first network to name whistleaker

Good God, that's awkward. That looked like a less funny Onion news report. They called him a "whistle leaker" because "whistle-blower" didn't convey enough betrayal to Trump?

I've never seen OAN before so I'm not sure, but is that real? Was that a comedy skit?

 

[hog88]

Today?

 

[evillawyer]

Today?

Well, looks like it's gonna be a good day

https
://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/22/politics/impeachment-watch-october-21/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/

 

[Velo Vol]

Did he just discover what the Constitution says? He tweets as if this is new.

 

[evillawyer]

Did he just discover what the Constitution says? He tweets as if this is new.

Wow, his use of lynching will go over well. Glad we didn't elect that overly emotional woman with the email problems and instead went with this stable genius who continually engages in very legal, very cool stuff.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Wow, his use of lynching will go over well. Glad we didn't elect that overly emotional woman with the email problems and instead went with this stable genius who continually engages in very legal, very cool stuff.

LOL, you would certainly know one!

 

[0nelilreb]

Wow, his use of lynching will go over well. Glad we didn't elect that overly emotional woman with the email problems and instead went with this stable genius who continually engages in very legal, very cool stuff.

Why would the use of a word “lynching “go over badly ?

 

[evillawyer]

Why would the use of a word “lynching “go over badly ?

Uh, because this is a silver spoon in mouth, entitled white dude that's never been in need of anything equating the use of a legal, constitutionally-mandated process for the removal of a president to an illegal activity historically used to kill black people.

 

[Stew Cook]

Why would the use of a word “lynching “go over badly ?

I think if he had used "extermination" it would have resonated better.

But he's not so stupid, to not know what effect that the word "lynching" would have with the media and social mediasphere.

 

[tvolsfan]

Did he just discover what the Constitution says? He tweets as if this is new.

No question the republicans would have impeached Obama if they could find a reason.