hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,480
- Likes
- 162,436
So today’s defense of Trump is that a CIA agent who worked in the White House worked with the President, Vice-President, and CIA Director?
View attachment 235073
So today’s defense of Trump is that a CIA agent who worked in the White House worked with the President, Vice-President, and CIA Director?
View attachment 235073
That's complete nonsense. Talk about your right wing propaganda.
This has always been about nothing but Trump.
Again, how you guys didn't understand this from the minute you nominated the moron escapes me.
Had Hillary won, I knew fully well that the right would do everything within their power to end/ruin her presidency starting on the night of the election. That's why I didn't support her in the primary. I knew 30 years of right wing propaganda had take its toll.
The difference is, Trump is actually worse than what you wrongly believed Hillary to be.
There is none so blind as he who refuses to see.
Wow you are really behind on newsFlynn had been convicted in a court of law of a felony. What crime has Lt. Col. Vindman been convicted of?
The outlets he follows doesn't report stuff like thatWow you are really behind on news
FBI agents manipulated Flynn file, as Clapper allegedly urged ‘kill shot’: court filing
Wow you are really behind on news
FBI agents manipulated Flynn file, as Clapper allegedly urged ‘kill shot’: court filing
Yes, this is what Republicans want you to believe. They know Trump looks like **** here, so they are hoping they can just slander the whistleblower. But after the president and his chief of staff basically admitted wrongdoing, and multiple people have apparently testified that the president tried to strongarm Ukraine to help his presidential campaign, the identity of the whistleblower is no longer important.
Wow you are really behind on news
FBI agents manipulated Flynn file, as Clapper allegedly urged ‘kill shot’: court filing
Are you not doing the exact same thing? You are Parroting the Democrats with the whole" The whistleblower is no longer important". How do you know that it isn't.?
That's been the question from before day one. And the "riffing" Schiff did, making up the conversation Trump had. And the undisclosed interactions he had with the whistleblowers. And the screeching promises from the democrats since day 1 that they'd impeach Trump.Remember all we’ve heard from Trumpkins for 6 weeks is that he only has second hand information. It’s all hearsay. Now they’re starting to call witnesses who had actual first hand knowledge.
Why do we even need to hear from a guy who just had second hand information? Why even call that guy as a witness?