The Impeachment Thread

[evillawyer]

lol

He's a fact witness. His legal opinions are neither here nor there. He's not making the legal determination here.

 

[tvolsfan]

He's a fact witness. His legal opinions are neither here nor there. He's not making the legal determination here.

What? You’re saying when lawyers interrogate a witness, they don’t ask for their legal opinion?

 

[VolnJC]

Lol this POS got ratioed for reporting exactly opposite of what Morrison testified to love that our side is fighting and calling out The MSM shills

 

[hog88]

Lol this POS got ratioed for reporting exactly opposite of what Morrison testified to love that our side is fighting and calling out The MSM shills

Summary, can't read

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Yes, and what a great day for democracy and congressional oversight.

It will be an even better day when Schiff is hauled in before the Judiciary Committee.

 

[GVF]

Cart before horse.

What process should have been:
1. Vote to open hearings for inquiry, agree on impeachment rules
2. Investigative process
3. Send to House for formal vote.

What we got:
1. The Peloschiff show
2. Investigations, interviews, and basement shenanigans
3. Inquiry complete
4. Now, let's really vote to formally agree on inquiry rules and officially open an inquiry
5. ??

 

[VolnJC]

Summary, can't read

He said the call wasn't illegal

 

[NorthDallas40]

He said the call wasn't illegal

He also contradicted many other points Taylor had made. Morrison was not a help for the Dim impeachment cause today. Womp womp.

 

[1972 Grad]

He also contradicted many other points Taylor had made. Morrison was not a help for the Dim impeachment cause today. Womp womp.

Don't forget to make some reference to blue balls, or to post a Beatles song.

 

[GVF]

I would gladly take a loss to a level headed, established (non horrendously despicable) guy to rid the world of Trump.
It's not s much about the R or D; it's all about Trump being horrendously despicable.

And yet, I bet Trump would not get refused Holy Communion.

 

[lawgator1]

Cart before horse.

What process should have been:
1. Vote to open hearings for inquiry, agree on impeachment rules
2. Investigative process
3. Send to House for formal vote.

What we got:
1. The Peloschiff show
2. Investigations, interviews, and basement shenanigans
3. Inquiry complete
4. Now, let's really vote to formally agree on inquiry rules and officially open an inquiry
5. ??

This is all you and Trump have left. No one but the base of the base of the base is going to accept that over the facts of what Trump did.

 

[Sandman 423]

His legal opinion is irrelevant

So dude was on the call, said the transcript that was released was correct and his opinion doesn't matter?

 

[VolStrom]

I must be stupid because I can't see how interviewing people that didn't have first hand knowledge of the phone call is damning while the actual transcript is nothing. The democrats are like a dog humping a tree.

 

[tvolsfan]

So dude was on the call, said the transcript that was released was correct and his opinion doesn't matter?

His testimony of what happened matters. His legal opinion does not.

 

[GVF]

His legal opinion is irrelevant

Of course it is now. Wouldn't expect you to say it is since he broke rank.

 

[GVF]

I must be stupid because I can't see how interviewing people that didn't have first hand knowledge of the phone call is damning while the actual transcript is nothing. The democrats are like a dog humping a tree.

More like a sapling.

 

[VolnJC]

So dude was on the call, said the transcript that was released was correct and his opinion doesn't matter?

Dems much prefer Taylor's 4th hand info over someone who was actually there

 

[Sandman 423]

His testimony of what happened matters. His legal opinion does not.

I agree and neither does the other witnesses. Is he an honorable dude just telling the facts or is he an immoral Trumpkin?

 

[1972 Grad]

I must be stupid because I can't see how interviewing people that didn't have first hand knowledge of the phone call is damning while the actual transcript is nothing. The democrats are like a dog humping a tree.

Russiagate 2.0.

 

[tvolsfan]

I must be stupid because I can't see how interviewing people that didn't have first hand knowledge of the phone call is damning while the actual transcript is nothing. The democrats are like a dog humping a tree.

1. An actual transcript does not exist.
2. What Trump released is not “nothing.” It was incredibly stupid to release it.
3. They have interviewed people who did have first hand knowledge of the call.

 

[volfanjustin]

Of course it is now. Wouldn't expect you to say it is since he broke rank.

If he said he had suspicions about the call they would be here drooling over the guy

 

[GVF]

His testimony of what happened matters. His legal opinion does not.

Well then, by your statement, his testimony of what happened pretty much kicked Schiff in the nuts. That being most important.

So, I'm curious. Do you hold the same opinion of the opinions of all the ones testifying that in their opinion, it appears that Trump..... I've not seen one that said this happened. Everyone says it's their opinion... Or that it appears... Opinions are jack s***.

 

[1972 Grad]

1. An actual transcript does not exist.
2. What Trump released is not “nothing.” It was incredibly stupid to release it.
3. They have interviewed people who did have first hand knowledge of the call.

You will again be disappointed, unless one of you loons manages to kill Trump. Then, you will rejoice.

 

[hog88]

So dude was on the call, said the transcript that was released was correct and his opinion doesn't matter?

Of course it doesn't, he didn't start off "orange man bad!"

 

[RikidyBones]

Democrats are so ****ing stupid. It's amazing. Yall focused on impeachment, will lose that battle and then while your little packers are going limp, will lose the election. All it took for the democrats to win this election is to be NORMAL and they fiercely battled to achieve the opposite. Why?