The Impeachment Thread

[happy-go_vol]

By all means, let's impeach a duly elected President over policy concerns and differences.

Thats pretty much what happening. I know this, if the Mueller report had anything close to collusion the marxists would have started impeachment proceedings and we would have never heard of this call. They were going to impeach him no matter what.

 

[tvolsfan]

By all means, let's impeach a duly elected President over policy concerns and differences.

If that’s all this was, they would have done it after the Mueller report was completed.

 

[hog88]

Vindman didn’t say he had no issues with the call. He expressed concerns.

By what's been leaked it appears that his concerns were political in nature.

 

[Stew Cook]

So one guy's testimony that he thought it was illegal and would hurt "bi-partisan" efforts to help Ukraine is damning but another guy that saw nothing wrong with it means nothing?

One guy stated that the "word for word, comma for comma" transcript was neither complete nor stated the extent that Trump was asking that the Bidens be investigated.

Doesn't spark your interest?

 

[GVF]

Vindman didn’t say he had no issues with the call. He expressed concerns.

Was referring to Morrison. He was on the call. But, being a first hand witness that said nothing illegal happened, his opinion doesn't count. Why won't you guys comment on his testimony. Oh wait, ya'll did. his opinion doesn't count.

 

[1972 Grad]

This will be the new normal until we collapse. A house divided and all.

Hillary doesn't accept that she lost, and neither does the fat gap tooth woman in Georgia.

 

[1972 Grad]

If that’s all this was, they would have done it after the Mueller report was completed.

They have been trying to do it for 3 years.

 

[GVF]

This will be the new normal until we collapse. A house divided and all.

The left has gotten so far out of bounds, even Obama broke ranks this week.

 

[tvolsfan]

Was referring to Morrison. He was on the call. But, being a first hand witness that said nothing illegal happened, his opinion doesn't count. Why won't you guys comment on his testimony. Oh wait, ya'll did. his opinion doesn't count.

His legal opinion doesn’t count. His recollection of the facts is what matters.

 

[tvolsfan]

Hillary doesn't accept that she lost, and neither does the fat gap tooth woman in Georgia.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. Trump was disputing the outcome of the election before it happened.

 

[Stew Cook]

By what's been leaked it appears that his concerns were political in nature.

They were. He was concerned that Trump was trying to make Ukraine a political tool.

 

[RockyTop85]

Get this. R's can subpoena people, but only with Schiff permission. Wait until this blows up.

It’s the exact same subpoena procedure that was set up in 1998. I posted the Clinton resolution earlier in the thread.

 

[Sandman 423]

If that’s all this was, they would have done it after the Mueller report was completed.

Except Muller didn't find collusion Between Trump and Russia. If he did, as a lot of you like to say,why did he not charge one single person in Trumps sphere with it?

 

[GVF]

His legal opinion doesn’t count. His recollection of the facts is what matters.

So, how do you like his recollection of facts. You seem to be avoiding that.

FACT - He said he heard nothing illegal. He was on the call. First hand witness.

 

[tvolsfan]

Except Muller didn't find collusion Between Trump and Russia./QUOTE]
Which is why the democrats didn’t impeach him. This is different. The democrats believe his conduct was impeachable, so they will impeach him.

 

[hog88]

One guy stated that the "word for word, comma for comma" transcript was neither complete nor stated the extent that Trump was asking that the Bidens be investigated.

Doesn't spark your interest?

If there were corroborating witnesses saying the same it might.

They way I understand these calls are handled is that they are not recorded, x number of analysts listen to the call, they write a memo of what they heard then they compare and come up with an official memo. So I wouldn't be surprised that it's common for them to disagree.

 

[37L1]

It’s the exact same subpoena procedure that was set up in 1998. I posted the Clinton resolution earlier in the thread.

Was Schiff calling the shots then?

 

[VolStrom]

For the billionth time for all the redhats to hear, take notes, and understand; that thing you are calling a transcript is a summation of the transcript.

Well aren't you in the know. So the best notes and recollection of people paid to transcribe presidential phone calls is not reliable and some gumba lt colonel relying on his memory is reliable? Just think about that for a moment.

 

[RikidyBones]

It’s the exact same subpoena procedure that was set up in 1998. I posted the Clinton resolution earlier in the thread.

and I dont like that either. two wrongs and what not.

 

[GVF]

They were. He was concerned that Trump was trying to make Ukraine a political tool.

Good spin. Dizzy?

 

[1972 Grad]

Hillary conceded the night of the election. Trump was disputing the outcome of the election before it happened.

She has recently said that she "would beat him(Trump) again." Care to comment on the 55,000 vote deficit of the lardass gap tooth blob in Georgia, who will probably be somebody's VP candidate because they need the black vote? She still believes that she won.

 

[tvolsfan]

So, how do you like his recollection of facts. You seem to be avoiding that.

FACT - He said he heard nothing illegal. He was on the call. First hand witness.

He can say he heard nothing he thought was illegal, but if he confirms quid pro quo, which he seems to have done, his testimony is gold for the democrats.

 

[hog88]

Hillary doesn't accept that she lost, and neither does the fat gap tooth woman in Georgia.

And the Rs will act the same the next time they lose. It will be rinse and repeat from here on out.

 

[tvolsfan]

She has recently said that she "would beat him( Trump )again."

Clearly taking a jab at the electoral college. If she thought she had actually one, she wouldn’t have conceded. Simple as that.

 

[GVF]

Well aren't you in the know. So the best notes and recollection of people paid to transcribe presidential phone calls is not reliable and some gumba lt colonel relying on his memory is reliable? Just think about that for a moment.

Documentation is everything. Atleast for everything not Dem related to taking Trump down.