The Impeachment Thread

[tvolsfan]

So dude was on the call, said the transcript that was released was correct and his opinion doesn't matter?

Vindman literally mentioned inaccuracies.

 

[tvolsfan]

Well then, by your statement, his testimony of what happened pretty much kicked Schiff in the nuts. That being most important.

So, I'm curious. Do you hold the same opinion of the opinions of all the ones testifying that in their opinion, it appears that Trump..... I've not seen one that said this happened. Everyone says it's their opinion... Or that it appears... Opinions are jack s***.

You will again be disappointed, unless one of you loons manages to kill Trump. Then, you will rejoice.

Then you have nothing to worry about.

 

[1972 Grad]

Of course it doesn't, he didn't start off "orange man bad!"

What are your honest thoughts about the future of our country when one side can't accept the results of an election? Where do we go from here?

 

[GVF]

He's a fact witness. His legal opinions are neither here nor there. He's not making the legal determination here.

But, he did say he saw no issue with what Trump said on the call. True? Not a win for you. Facts are facts. A primary witness said "Do What?"

 

[1972 Grad]

Then you have nothing to worry about.

I worry that you people will create so much vitriol and hate, that one of you loons will assassinate Trump.

 

[Orangeburst]

They have to, since he is joined at the hip with Schiff and the Democrats.

Get this. R's can subpoena people, but only with Schiff permission. Wait until this blows up.

 

[tvolsfan]

In worry that you people will create so much vitriol and hate, that one of you loons will assassinate Trump.

Stop being a drama queen. It’s not like anybody insinuated Trump was a foreign born Islamic terrorist.

 

[RikidyBones]

Republicans can always release witness affidavits to the public if denied by schiff. What's to stop them?

 

[VolStrom]

1. An actual transcript does not exist.
2. What Trump released is not “nothing.” It was incredibly stupid to release it.
3. They have interviewed people who did have first hand knowledge of the call.

So a transcript of which 4 people listen to and collaborate to make sure the written transcript is correct is not good enough? They all conspired to lie? There is nothing on that call that is grounds for impeachment.

If you think this is grounds for impeachment, there is going to be an impeachment everytime there is a different house and president from now on.

 

[1972 Grad]

Get this. R's can subpoena people, but only with Schiff permission. Wait until this blows up.

Schifferbrains will block everything.

 

[GVF]

This is all you and Trump have left. No one but the base of the base of the base is going to accept that over the facts of what Trump did.

Game over. lol. The game just missed wide right on one testimony they needed.

 

[Sandman 423]

Vindman literally mentioned inaccuracies.

So he is a _____________?

 

[GVF]

If he said he had suspicions about the call they would be here drooling over the guy

But, since he said he saw no issues with the call...his opinion doesn't count. lol.

 

[tvolsfan]

But, since he said he saw no issues with the call...his opinion doesn't count. lol.

Vindman didn’t say he had no issues with the call. He expressed concerns.

 

[1972 Grad]

Stop being a drama queen. It’s not like anybody insinuated Trump was a foreign born Islamic terrorist.

I have seen how you folks act out in public by assaulting Trump supporters. It's not much of a stretch to see one of them take matters into their own hands, since they have been told that Trump will leave the country in ruins, and destroy the environment.

 

[hog88]

His testimony of what happened matters. His legal opinion does not.

So one guy's testimony that he thought it was illegal and would hurt "bi-partisan" efforts to help Ukraine is damning but another guy that saw nothing wrong with it means nothing?

 

[golfballs]

Summary, can't read

 

[Mick]

I must be stupid because I can't see how interviewing people that didn't have first hand knowledge of the phone call is damning while the actual transcript is nothing. The democrats are like a dog humping a tree.

For the billionth time for all the redhats to hear, take notes, and understand; that thing you are calling a transcript is a summation of the transcript.

 

[golfballs]

 

[GVF]

Vindman literally mentioned inaccuracies.

???? There are inaccuracies between him and every other person they've interviewed. Their compilation of evidence is as spotty as a Dalmation. And they can only take excperts of interviews to make a case. they can't take it as a whole.

 

[1972 Grad]

Vindman didn’t say he had no issues with the call. He expressed concerns.

By all means, let's impeach a duly elected President over policy concerns and differences.

 

[happy-go_vol]

In worry that you people will create so much vitriol and hate, that one of you loons will assassinate Trump.

Yep, it is worrisome. For all the lies about right wings and their guns, it will be some antifa lacky that will do it. The marxist will continue to agitate until American give up. That the marxist agenda, continue agitating until they get their way.

 

[golfballs]

Lmao. Better go back to the drawing board. Wonder what witch-hunt we’ll have in 2020

 

[GVF]

For the billionth time for all the redhats to hear, take notes, and understand; that thing you are calling a transcript is a summation of the transcript.

Just like Schiff summates only what he wants people to hear from his interviews ??

 

[hog88]

What are your honest thoughts about the future of our country when one side can't accept the results of an election? Where do we go from here?

This will be the new normal until we collapse. A house divided and all.