The Impeachment Thread

[RavinDave]

That fear mongering is less scary than BS trade wars and threating everyone with tariffs. You know, the things that have actually caused carnage in the market this year.

I expect a lot of investors would be inclined to move their money to a safer place in the event of a Warren administration.

 

[VolnJC]

 

[VolnJC]

I expect a lot of investors would be inclined to move their money to a safer place in the event of a Warren administration.

When even Bill Gates is talking about being taxed too much you know it's extreme...he has provisioned to give all his money away to charities he should be allowed to do that not more government waste

 

[Septic]

LOL. Please tell me you don't manage your own money. Not that I really care about your finances, but this market has been a bonanza not seen since the gold rush. Or maybe you misused the word 'carnage'.

I'm using "carnage" in the same way trump is using it to fear monger to you clowns. Only one of us is able to recognize hyperbole in this sense, it would seem. This market has improved despite the dotard's shoulder against the door - imagine the gains we'd have realized without his fat yap threatening tariffs every time someone made fun of his tiny pecker. This market rally is in large part to the Fed easing rates and the bond bubble.

On to your other point "this market has been a bonanza not seen since the gold rush." Since you seem to have a short memory, I'm just going to leave this here:

The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But It Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump

 

[evillawyer]

I'm using "carnage" in the same way trump is using it to fear monger to you clowns. Only one of us is able to recognize hyperbole in this sense, it would seem. This market has improved despite the dotard's shoulder against the door - imagine the gains we'd have realized without his fat yap threatening tariffs every time someone made fun of his tiny pecker. This market rally is in large part to the Fed easing rates and the bond bubble.

On to your other point "this market has been a bonanza not seen since the gold rush." Since you seem to have a short memory, I'm just going to leave this here:

The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But It Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump

Oh this will be fun.

 

[Septic]

I expect a lot of investors would be inclined to move their money to a safer place in the event of a Warren administration.

Some would certainly, until the chicken little syndrome wore off and they realized that business will keep on chugging and the sky won't fall. They should be far more concerned about her tax and spend plans.

 

[RavinDave]

Some would certainly, until the chicken little syndrome wore off and they realized that business will keep on chugging and the sky won't fall. They should be far more concerned about her tax and spend plans.

It's her tax and spend plans that if passed will tank the market.

 

[volfanjustin]

Then get on Nancy’s azz about holding an impeachment vote. When that vote never happens who ya going to be mad at then?

I have been patiently waiting for you to ask your daily question here, my patience is running thin

 

[0nelilreb]

The "norm" is always changing. The norm in the 90's is not the norm of today. It's a gradual change and what this President is doing is well outside what is the "norm" of today. If it ever becomes the "norm" to subvert our own laws about investigating our citizens, there will be nothing left.

Wait what ? That last line . How many times does it have to be done before you consider it the norm ? Seems like for the last 11 years it’s been done way too many times and people just shrug . NSA, IRS , FBI , shadowing journalist , I’m sure there was more that I’m missing but that plenty for examples .

 

[Septic]

It's her tax and spend plans that if passed will tank the market.

Not much correlation in the two, historically minimal.

Taxes Don’t Move Stocks

 

[Orangeburst]

Funny how it's shifted to failed scheme, in place of just wanting to expose corruption.

The Quid Pro Quo constituted both of those things. I suppose it's a difficult concept for some.

You guys were arguing that QPQ was not a criminal proceeding and thus no need for criminal procedure. You now have witness tampering as Schiff is the jury and met with the witnesses pretrial.

Sounds to me you guys need to get your **** together.

 

[Septic]

Oh this will be fun.

It's always amused me to watch the right pretend to be the only people in the room that understand how the economy and markets work. It's less amusing that they've hijacked the narrative that they are the only ones competent enough to be fiscally responsible with the American tax revenue.

 

[Mick]

Wait what ? That last line . How many times does it have to be done before you consider it the norm ? Seems like for the last 11 years it’s been done way too many times and people just shrug . NSA, IRS , FBI , shadowing journalist , I’m sure there was more that I’m missing but that plenty for examples .

You seem to always miss one thing, the point of the posts you respond. It's wasn't about the NSA, IRS, FBI, or anything else. It was about what is considered the norm. The Norm is not a President asking another country to investigate our citizens.

 

[Septic]

You guys were arguing that QPQ was not a criminal proceeding and thus no need for criminal procedure. You now have witness tampering as Schiff is the jury and met with the witnesses pretrial.

Sounds to me you guys need to get your **** together.

I think you're misunderstanding what an investigation is and what a trial is. All of what has occurred thus far is "pre-trial".

 

[0nelilreb]

You seem to always miss one thing, the point of the posts you respond. It's wasn't about the NSA, IRS, FBI, or anything else. It was about what is considered the norm. The Norm is not a President asking another country to investigate our citizens.

I didn’t miss it , I asked what is the norm and then gave examples of how it’s been done often in the recent past . You said investigations into American citizens should never be the norm .

 

[37L1]

You seem to always miss one thing, the point of the posts you respond. It's wasn't about the NSA, IRS, FBI, or anything else. It was about what is considered the norm. The Norm is not a President asking another country to investigate our citizens.

Correct. He has others do it for him so that he has plausible deniability.

Then he can say he first heard about it on the news.

 

[GVF]

That fear mongering is less scary than BS trade wars and threating everyone with tariffs. You know, the things that have actually caused carnage in the market this year.

Except you missed the part about T and China coming to terms on the Trade Tariffs. Just a little something Orange Man put together for the country while the Lib Dems are doing nothing but waste tax dollars.

 

[Orangeburst]

I think you're misunderstanding what an investigation is and what a trial is. All of what has occurred thus far is "pre-trial".

BS. The idiots are implicating criminal charges. Everything is tainted for criminal charges.

 

[Stew Cook]

You guys were arguing that QPQ was not a criminal proceeding and thus no need for criminal procedure. You now have witness tampering as Schiff is the jury and met with the witnesses pretrial.

Sounds to me you guys need to get your **** together.

It's kind of like saying, "but you were accusing of being a thief, and now your accusing me of larceny. Make up your mind.'

 

[VolnJC]

We gonna need more Whistleblowers and more quid pro quo, extortion, and bribery

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I'm using "carnage" in the same way trump is using it to fear monger to you clowns. Only one of us is able to recognize hyperbole in this sense, it would seem. This market has improved despite the dotard's shoulder against the door - imagine the gains we'd have realized without his fat yap threatening tariffs every time someone made fun of his tiny pecker. This market rally is in large part to the Fed easing rates and the bond bubble.

On to your other point "this market has been a bonanza not seen since the gold rush." Since you seem to have a short memory, I'm just going to leave this here:

The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But It Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump

That truly is interesting. From a personal perspective, I have fared FAR better under Trump than I did under Zero. I already hit my retirement numbers and I have 6 more years. That is, unless Pocahontas gets elected, then I will have to work to 80.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Gosh, can Zero run for a third term? He was truly awesome

 

[tvolsfan]

this so-called wistleblower and his lawyer should be arrested and tried for sedition

For what?

 

[Septic]

That truly is interesting. From a personal perspective, I have fared FAR better under Trump than I did under Zero. I already hit my retirement numbers and I have 6 more years. That is, unless Pocahontas gets elected, then I will have to work to 80.

Kind of amazing how your perception isn't congruent with reality at all, isn't it? Just out of curiosity, did you start saving for retirement when trump was elected - or is possible you've benefited in from the prior administration as well as the graphs above indicate would be accurate? That is, so long as we're basing a president's worth on how the market does.

 

[zeppelin128]

We gonna need more Whistleblowers and more quid pro quo, extortion, and bribery