The Impeachment Thread

If he’s out of the loop then he has nothing to add. You can’t have it both ways. I haven’t read Sondland’s yet but even CNN’s Cuomo literally just said so far there is no one that has been able to verify Trump ordered aid withheld for investigating Biden.

That'd only be Rudy, by my estimates. They'll have to bring him in kicking and screaming, just to plead the fifth.
 
You literally can not make this stuff up...just read on Twitter that Dems are saying that they let the GOP build the quid pro quo talking points..that they..meaning the Dems were pushing bribery and extortion crimes all the time
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
You literally can not make this stuff up...just read on Twitter that Dems are saying that they let the GOP build the quid pro quo talking points..that they..meaning the Dems were pushing bribery and extortion crimes all the time

Come to think of it, it's true. From the day Trump released the partial transcript. Nobody said "No Quid Pro Quo" more than him.

But no link?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
You literally can not make this stuff up...just read on Twitter that Dems are saying that they let the GOP build the quid pro quo talking points..that they..meaning the Dems were pushing bribery and extortion crimes all the time

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic and tvolsfan
You literally can not make this stuff up...just read on Twitter that Dems are saying that they let the GOP build the quid pro quo talking points..that they..meaning the Dems were pushing bribery and extortion crimes all the time


Straw man.

Claim the Dems are arguing X, them knock down X and claim victory.

Even if that's not what was being claimed.

Trump will be impeached for abuse of office. He is guilty as sin. The only issue is whether the GOP Senators decide it is not worthy of removal (a/k/a too scared to do the right thing)
 
Come to think of it, it's true. From the day Trump released the partial transcript. Nobody said "No Quid Pro Quo" more than him.

But no link?
The Democrats are shifting their verbiage from quid-pro-quo to bribery. A "quid-pro-quo" is not necessarily an impeachable offense, but the United States Constitution specifically states that "bribery" is an impeachable offense. That is a subtle and savvy maneuver from Democrats, and everyone seems to be on the same page with it. That is the narrative that they need to be advancing in unison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Straw man.

Claim the Dems are arguing X, them knock down X and claim victory.

Even if that's not what was being claimed.

Trump will be impeached for abuse of office. He is guilty as sin. The only issue is whether the GOP Senators decide it is not worthy of removal (a/k/a too scared to do the right thing)
They already hitched their wagon to that horse.............................'s a$$. There is no stopping or jumping off at this point. The ones that could get off before they hitched up did.
 
Ok, Justin..

But what does the QPQ constitute? Have you ever heard of someone being charged with Quid Pro Quo?
 
Yeah, but what does the QPQ constitute? Have you ever heard of someone being charged with Quid Pro Quo?
This was you and your side who said quod pro quo 9667796539273 times, just like with the faux collusion crap. After a few months you all even started saying well collusion isn’t a crime. Your all’s twisting in the wind is comical
 
This was you and your side who said quod pro quo 9667796539273 times, just like with the faux collusion crap. After a few months you all even started saying well collusion isn’t a crime. Your all’s twisting in the wind is comical

Well, the fun is just getting started. I think the hearings will have a little something for everyone. Even for Justin.
 
Ok, Justin..

But what does the QPQ constitute? Have you ever heard of someone being charged with Quid Pro Quo?

Have you ever heard of a president being charged with bribery . The left is going all in with anything the lawyers can do to make it stick .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Have you ever heard of a president being charged with bribery . The left is going all in with anything the lawyers can can to make stick .

Not until, Trump... Not surprising, considering an account of Trump complaining to Tillerson about it not being llegal to bribe foreign governments.
 
This is the day for Dems
1)Their star witness Taylor admitted he read about the quid pro quo in the NY Times
2)The Whistleblowers attorney not only admitted to starting a coup in 2017 but also likes young Disney girls YouTube videos
3)Schiff forgets to redact the Whistleblowers name from released transcripts
4) After hearing quid pro quo slam dunk since the transcript was released in September they have abandoned it and now talking about bribery and extortion
Yeah the open hearings will be fun
 
This was you and your side who said quod pro quo 9667796539273 times, just like with the faux collusion crap. After a few months you all even started saying well collusion isn’t a crime. Your all’s twisting in the wind is comical

All day yesterday "we got him now on QPQ". Like I said, what a joke.
 
This is the day for Dems
1)Their star witness Taylor admitted he read about the quid pro quo in the NY Times
2)The Whistleblowers attorney not only admitted to starting a coup in 2017 but also likes young Disney girls YouTube videos
3)Schiff forgets to redact the Whistleblowers name from released transcripts
4) After hearing quid pro quo slam dunk since the transcript was released in September they have abandoned it and now talking about bribery and extortion
Yeah the open hearings will be fun

Dims are soooo stupid it's hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
This is the day for Dems
1)Their star witness Taylor admitted he read about the quid pro quo in the NY Times
2)The Whistleblowers attorney not only admitted to starting a coup in 2017 but also likes young Disney girls YouTube videos
3)Schiff forgets to redact the Whistleblowers name from released transcripts
4) After hearing quid pro quo slam dunk since the transcript was released in September they have abandoned it and now talking about bribery and extortion
Yeah the open hearings will be fun

So, you guys wanted the whistleblowers name, and you got it. For what? To formally accuse his attorney of starting a coup in a two year old Twitter post, and insinuate that he is a pedo, with basically no evidence...

Yeah, you guys really win the day..
 
So, you guys wanted the whistleblowers name, and you got it. For what? To formally accuse his attorney of starting a coup in a two year old Twitter post, and insinuate that he is a pedo, with basically no evidence...

Yeah, you guys really win the day..

Might as well have him openly testify now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
So, you guys wanted the whistleblowers name, and you got it. For what? To formally accuse his attorney of starting a coup in a two year old Twitter post, and insinuate that he is a pedo, with basically no evidence...

Yeah, you guys really win the day..
You remember when basically every Democrat in the world accused Kavanaugh of being a rapist with absolutely no evidence? Good times.
 

VN Store



Back
Top