The Impeachment Thread

It also has to do with executive privilege and separation of powers between executive and legislative branches. No sense giving that privilege up to a hostile Conress. Bad precedent to set.
It also has to do with him being guilty and trying to grasp onto that fraying thread of reasonable doubt.
 
Until you prove something there’s nothing to defend.
LOL.....That's like saying until they score a touchdown, there is no need to play defense.
You have it a little backwards.
Once you prove something, there is no defense.
 
Actually it’s nothing like that dumbass example at all

The liberal revolution needs to wipe its *** with the presumption of innocence. Like Hillary said, if an old constitution won't let them take trump down, that old constitution needs a new shredder.

The greatest thing to happen in all of this is the unmasking of the liberals.
 
So... not a transcript?
So you asked this and then went all quiet? What’s your earth shattering update counselor? Do you have a link to a more complete transcript or as a minimum an official, ANY official, with direct knowledge who contests the content of the transcript?
 
You should be part of Trump's legal council.
"Don't defend yourself until it's proven."
That's sort of been Trump's way all along.

They've presented nothing of damage, and the Rs are running public to point out just how lame and failing this is. There is no need for Trump to play into this. And as (I think 72) pointed out, there's absolutely NO need for him to put people in a perjury trap, or set precedent that weakens the office going forward.

The very fact that he hasn't stepped in to participate is an indication of just how little the Ds have actually presented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
They've presented nothing of damage, and the Rs are running public to point out just how lame and failing this is. There is no need for Trump to play into this. And as (I think 72) pointed out, there's absolutely NO need for him to put people in a perjury trap, or set precedent that weakens the office going forward.

The very fact that he hasn't stepped in to participate is an indication of just how little the Ds have actually presented.
Let me see if I can form Luther’s reply.

Ahem

“NUH uh! That is not rational and reasonable. It’s like the dark side of the moon reflecting off of the rings of Uranus”
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
Let me see if I can form Luther’s reply.

Ahem

“NUH uh! That is not rational and reasonable. It’s like the dark side of the moon reflecting off of the rings of Uranus”
Luther is an idealist whose brain has been washed to the point of transparency. He deserves little more than an occasional passing response to remind the board that he's a self-refuting bundle of contradictions.
 
Luther is an idealist whose brain has been washed to the point of transparency. He deserves little more than an occasional passing response to remind the board that he's a self-refuting bundle of contradictions.

Dare to show anything that TRUMP's his virtue signaling and he ignores or retreats. Perfect representation of the modern liberal.
 
LOL.....That's like saying until they score a touchdown, there is no need to play defense.
You have it a little backwards.
Once you prove something, there is no defense.

No.....It’s like saying the other team cheats but there are no flags just crying by the team getting beat down. Then when you’re asked how they cheat you try to get other teams they beat to accuse them of cheating but still with no legitimate evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
your numbers are what suck.

Are you gonna go cry now since your fantasy island of made up Dim lies does not compute for Impeachment.
I wonder what's next the loony Dims will come up with since the phone call blunder didn't work?
Oh, that's right we got some more numb-nuts coming in to say they heard from somebody else the same as before.
 
No.....It’s like saying the other team cheats but there are no flags just crying by the team getting beat down. Then when you’re asked how they cheat you try to get other teams they beat to accuse them of cheating but still with no legitimate evidence.
I had to read that 5 times before I understood it. God I’m slow...😥
 
The liberal revolution needs to wipe its *** with the presumption of innocence. Like Hillary said, if an old constitution won't let them take trump down, that old constitution needs a new shredder.

The greatest thing to happen in all of this is the unmasking of the liberals.
That's hilarious that you talk about the presumption of innocence and Hillary in the same sentence.
Not a single redhatter presumes Hillary is innocent even though she has never been proven guilty of anything.
Do you think Hillary is innocent of all which she has been accused?
 
No.....It’s like saying the other team cheats but there are no flags just crying by the team getting beat down. Then when you’re asked how they cheat you try to get other teams they beat to accuse them of cheating but still with no legitimate evidence.
No. It's not "like" anything. It *is* saying that Trump is presumed guilty and bears the burden of proving his own innocence since the Dems can't prove his guilt. It's the same idiotic sham the Dems tried with the Mueller investigation.

Ya'll really need to smarten up and stop letting luther play you with word salad games. Directly show him the stupidity of his comments and stop playing "like" games with him.
 

VN Store



Back
Top