NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,659
- Likes
- 82,222
Actually it’s nothing like that dumbass example at all
You should be part of Trump's legal council.
"Don't defend yourself until it's proven."
That's sort of been Trump's way all along.
Let me see if I can form Luther’s reply.They've presented nothing of damage, and the Rs are running public to point out just how lame and failing this is. There is no need for Trump to play into this. And as (I think 72) pointed out, there's absolutely NO need for him to put people in a perjury trap, or set precedent that weakens the office going forward.
The very fact that he hasn't stepped in to participate is an indication of just how little the Ds have actually presented.
Luther is an idealist whose brain has been washed to the point of transparency. He deserves little more than an occasional passing response to remind the board that he's a self-refuting bundle of contradictions.Let me see if I can form Luther’s reply.
Ahem
“NUH uh! That is not rational and reasonable. It’s like the dark side of the moon reflecting off of the rings of Uranus”
Luther is an idealist whose brain has been washed to the point of transparency. He deserves little more than an occasional passing response to remind the board that he's a self-refuting bundle of contradictions.
LOL.....That's like saying until they score a touchdown, there is no need to play defense.
You have it a little backwards.
Once you prove something, there is no defense.
your numbers are what suck.
I had to read that 5 times before I understood it. God I’m slow...No.....It’s like saying the other team cheats but there are no flags just crying by the team getting beat down. Then when you’re asked how they cheat you try to get other teams they beat to accuse them of cheating but still with no legitimate evidence.
That's hilarious that you talk about the presumption of innocence and Hillary in the same sentence.The liberal revolution needs to wipe its *** with the presumption of innocence. Like Hillary said, if an old constitution won't let them take trump down, that old constitution needs a new shredder.
The greatest thing to happen in all of this is the unmasking of the liberals.
No. It's not "like" anything. It *is* saying that Trump is presumed guilty and bears the burden of proving his own innocence since the Dems can't prove his guilt. It's the same idiotic sham the Dems tried with the Mueller investigation.No.....It’s like saying the other team cheats but there are no flags just crying by the team getting beat down. Then when you’re asked how they cheat you try to get other teams they beat to accuse them of cheating but still with no legitimate evidence.