hjeagle1vol
TOP GUN TENNESSEE DTBmc
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 7,868
- Likes
- 27,323
Why should he? You looking to alter someone’s statement? Dissect words to get a perjury charge? Why would anyone voluntarily succumb to some scam and subject themselves to an investigation for no reason so the DIMwits can dig for some bs?
Why should he? You looking to alter someone’s statement? Dissect words to get a perjury charge? Why would anyone voluntarily succumb to some scam and subject themselves to an investigation for no reason so the DIMwits can dig for some bs?
To defend himself against the false accusations with the truth,.....oh wait a minute.Why should he? You looking to alter someone’s statement? Dissect words to get a perjury charge? Why would anyone voluntarily succumb to some scam and subject themselves to an investigation for no reason so the DIMwits can dig for some bs?
Does it exist yet? They’re not drafted in real time.Do you have a link to Sandy’s released transcript?
As the transcripts were released, impeachment investigators wrapped up a rare Saturday session interviewing Mark Sandy, a little-known career official at the Office of Management and Budget who was involved in key meetings about the aid package.
Sandy's name had barely come up in previous testimony. But it did on one particular date: July 25, the day of Trump's call with Zelenskiy. That day, a legal document with Sandy's signature directed a freeze of the security funds to Ukraine, according to testimony.
<snip my bad>Does it exist yet? They’re not drafted in real time.
Stenographer types into a machine with a specific shorthand. Computer program translates the shorthand into words. They then go through and listen to the recording and make necessary edits. Then proofread the transcript.
Unless the congressional typing pool does it differently but I doubt it.