BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 26,339
- Likes
- 20,338
Not necessary. All his tweets are verified as true.Solomon background reading for you:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/15/john-solomon-leaves-behind-lasting-damage-hill/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory-fox-news-viewers-his-punishment-contract/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/us/politics/john-solomon-ukraine-fox-news-the-hill.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/66962/a-dozen-questions-for-john-solomon/
You forgot your usual “a good read” sales line tripe girl.Solomon background reading for you:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/15/john-solomon-leaves-behind-lasting-damage-hill/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory-fox-news-viewers-his-punishment-contract/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/us/politics/john-solomon-ukraine-fox-news-the-hill.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/66962/a-dozen-questions-for-john-solomon/
But what are they a credible witness to if they never heard from Trump directly that a QPQ was in play? So far, everything presented is still hearsay and circumstantial. It's all about what you want to believe, and we know what each side wants to believe. Nothing concrete has presented itself as of yet.
Add to that you refer to them as credible witnesses then criticize when the other side challenges their credibility.
When this all started, did you automatically assume his guilt? I'm just curious if you ever entertained the idea that he might not be. Sure, he's a despicable person entirely capable of doing something like this, but does that automatically make him guilty?
And though I'm not arguing from a pro-Trump standpoint, more a pro-justice system standpoint IMO, I expect you'll give me a typical Septic response.