The Intel Leaks Thread

#376
#376
Boston Vol said:
I used to think that she was just the typical new breed politician who was using her office to boost her appeal to a certain segment of the population. That way she could make a ton of money after leaving office. Now I realize that she’s actually a legit ****ing moron.
Click to expand...

She's called EmptyG for a reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol, WoodsmanVol and NorthDallas40
#382
#382
BigOrangeTrain said:
Yeah you really know what a conspiracy is. You got schooled and now you are in desperation mode. Good job 😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...
How do you define conspiracy?

Follow up: are you saying that if multiple individuals in the intelligence and law enforcement communities CONSPIRED to set this young man up, it would not be a CONSPIRACY?
 
Last edited:
#384
#384
The leaker was a "cyber transport system" airman:

From today's New York Times:

"According to an Air Force career website, all “cyber transport system” airmen must pass the kind of background investigation required for a top-secret clearance, which allows them to work on computer networks carrying the most sensitive data.
Airmen assigned to the 102nd Intelligence Wing and the 102nd Intelligence Support Squadron produce intelligence reports from data collected by a variety of sensors on the U-2, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-1 Predator, MQ-9 Reaper and other intelligence and reconnaissance aircraft and systems, U.S. military officials said on Friday.
Airman Teixeira was a computer systems technician supporting the analysts compiling those reports, one official said. Unlike many reservists who deploy overseas when mobilized to active duty, Airman Teixeira and other members of his unit could do all assigned work at their home base on Cape Cod."

This is in line with what I posted earlier from another newspaper, but even more specific....

Marjorie Taylor Greene--good grief, what a freak show she is. Aggressively stupid.
 
#385
#385
Boston Vol said:
I used to think that she was just the typical new breed politician who was using her office to boost her appeal to a certain segment of the population. That way she could make a ton of money after leaving office. Now I realize that she’s actually a legit ****ing moron.
Click to expand...

Brennan: Marjorie Taylor Greene ‘Not Fit to Hold Public Office’

Former CIA Director John Brennan Friday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) was “not fit to hold public office” because of comments she made about the Air National Guardsman Jack Teixeira accused of leaking classified information.

Host Nicolle Wallace said, “Liz Cheney tweeted this, ‘Marjorie Taylor Greene makes clear yet again she cannot be trusted with America’s national security information and should not have a security clearance of any kind.’ I wanted to know why she does. She apparently sits on the Homeland Security Committee, of all things. Do you agree, though?”

Brennan: Marjorie Taylor Greene 'Not Fit to Hold Public Office'
 
#386
#386
Boston Vol said:
I used to think that she was just the typical new breed politician who was using her office to boost her appeal to a certain segment of the population. That way she could make a ton of money after leaving office. Now I realize that she’s actually a legit ****ing moron.
Click to expand...
I agree, I'm in her district and I'm working on sending a letter to the local and state Republicans to get her shut up. We need one qualified primary opponent to challenge her, not 6 unknown like last time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol, DuckInAPen, MontyPython and 1 other person
#387
#387
SlipKidVol said:
I agree, I'm in her district and I'm working on sending a letter to the local and state Republicans to get her shut up. We need one qualified primary opponent to challenge her, not 6 unknown like last time.
Click to expand...
How many points did she win by last time? She needs to go - but the voters must be the ones that do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol, SlipKidVol and StarRaider
#389
#389
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#390
#390
turbovol said:
The leaker was a "cyber transport system" airman:

From today's New York Times:

"According to an Air Force career website, all “cyber transport system” airmen must pass the kind of background investigation required for a top-secret clearance, which allows them to work on computer networks carrying the most sensitive data.
Airmen assigned to the 102nd Intelligence Wing and the 102nd Intelligence Support Squadron produce intelligence reports from data collected by a variety of sensors on the U-2, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-1 Predator, MQ-9 Reaper and other intelligence and reconnaissance aircraft and systems, U.S. military officials said on Friday.
Airman Teixeira was a computer systems technician supporting the analysts compiling those reports, one official said. Unlike many reservists who deploy overseas when mobilized to active duty, Airman Teixeira and other members of his unit could do all assigned work at their home base on Cape Cod."

This is in line with what I posted earlier from another newspaper, but even more specific....

Marjorie Taylor Greene--good grief, what a freak show she is. Aggressively stupid.
Click to expand...

No it’s not. You don’t have a ****ing clue what you’re talking about.
 
#397
#397
hog88 said:
No it’s not. You don’t have a ****ing clue what you’re talking about.
Click to expand...


Keep looking for your anger-management pills, ace. I posted an excerpt from a NYTimes article explaining what the leaker and his unit did.
 
#398
#398
hog88 said:
Makes the most sense out of everything that’s been put out.
Click to expand...


Ha: It's complete nonsense from another right-wing nut. Yet another loony conspiracy theory. Notice that every major news event is followed
by a few wingnuts claiming some sort of off-the-wall, follow the dots until the go inside your head and eat your little brain conspiracy.

An inside job to prepare the public for "the crash landing of U.S. foreign policy." What the hell does that even mean, besides nothing plus lunacy? What is one of the chief goals of Putin War Criminal's foreign policy? It is to splinter the Western alliance, break up Nato. (And by the by, it was very interesting that the ex prez who is quite fond of Putin, and all other autocrats, seldom missed an opportunity to rail about NATO. I recall a report that Trump would have tried to pull the U.S. out of NATO were he not aware that he'd be laughed at by every foreign-policy expert in the U.S. and Europe.) And what has been the result of the Putin's invasion of Ukraine? The Western allies/NATO have not only pulled together in the strongest way since maybe WWII, NATO just added a new member--Finland--and Sweden will soon be joining, officially, too. That's a huge win for the U.S., Europe, NATO--and a major bitch slap at the little bald-headed terrorist running Russia.

Even if the war ended in stalemate in the near future, Russia will have lost a lot. NATO has been expanded. Sanctions have hurt the Russian economy, which is deteriorating--oil and gas revenues have fallen sharply. The military has lost a massive amount of equipment and been embarrassed. Large numbers of smart Russians have fled the country. Will they even come back? Russia has failed to take Ukraine and is a global pariah--supported only by a handful of other autocratic pariahs. One could go on. Ukraine has been a major U.S. foreign-policy win. It's funny that some of the right-wingers who for decades were obsessed with the Red Menace and stopping the spread of communism (see Vietnam) now seem to think that the U.S. should just let a dictatorial thug take over Ukraine. Is it just because a Democrat is in the White House? What happened to American unity and spirit? It's been punctured by loonies spreading nonsense.

As for China, it's a big and complicated topic, obviously. Relations worsened when Trump started a trade war with China and they've not gotten better under Biden, who has taken a pretty hard line on China, too. There continue to be tensions over trade, Taiwan, commercial and military spying by China, the South China sea, etc.. The U.S. has to take a hard line on China--on that both Republicans and Democrats seem mostly in agreement. So I'm not sure how that relates to a foreign policy "crash landing," and I doubt the guy who said it knows either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#399
#399
Franklin Pierce said:
Brennan: Marjorie Taylor Greene ‘Not Fit to Hold Public Office’

Former CIA Director John Brennan Friday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) was “not fit to hold public office” because of comments she made about the Air National Guardsman Jack Teixeira accused of leaking classified information.
Host Nicolle Wallace said, “Liz Cheney tweeted this, ‘Marjorie Taylor Greene makes clear yet again she cannot be trusted with America’s national security information and should not have a security clearance of any kind.’ I wanted to know why she does. She apparently sits on the Homeland Security Committee, of all things. Do you agree, though?”
Brennan: Marjorie Taylor Greene 'Not Fit to Hold Public Office'
Click to expand...

She's not fit to hold onto a husband either. Her behavior clearly shows why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top