This is what I don't get. There no reason a state gaurdsman should have access to this info. There are serious issues with security clearances.Why are we giving such high level access to state level national guard? That doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. If he were deployed, maybe. But while state side? Not sure what necessity there was for this kid to have such access
What "lies" did the government say about Ukraine precisely?
What's the betting line on wait time before your next dumb post?
Not taking a stance either way, but Manning did spend 7 years in prison while Snowden fled to an adversary. If he voluntarily returned I think there's a good chance he'd face little to no prison time, assuming there is no evidence he divulged classified intelligence to Russia.It’s possible that post was dumb. I mean if you could provide me a valid reason for Obama pardoning “Chelsea” but not Edward Snowden (who actually provided the public with extremely useful information), I’ll reconsider.
Until then it seems like “Chelsea” was released because “she” is a part of a privileged class that the left treats with kid gloves
Not taking a stance either way, but Manning did spend 7 years in prison while Snowden fled to an adversary. If he voluntarily returned I think there's a good chance he'd face little to no prison time, assuming there is no evidence he divulged classified intelligence to Russia.
You do bring up an interesting 'what if', though. Let's say he did stay, faced trial and was imprisoned. Who gets pardoned? Both, Manning only, or neither?Snowden would have been buried under the jail and never saw the light of day.
Not taking a stance either way, but Manning did spend 7 years in prison while Snowden fled to an adversary. If he voluntarily returned I think there's a good chance he'd face little to no prison time, assuming there is no evidence he divulged classified intelligence to Russia.
The leaks have basically pointed out that Ukraine is nearly totally reliant on the US. And if Zelensky had his way, he'd send long range missiles into the hearts of every major city center in Russia which would bring China majorly into the fold and would start WWIII. So, basically, we are on the brink of WWIII because of the US strategy and unlimited support of Ukraine.
The leaks have basically pointed out that Ukraine is nearly totally reliant on the US. And if Zelensky had his way, he'd send long range missiles into the hearts of every major city center in Russia which would bring China majorly into the fold and would start WWIII. So, basically, we are on the brink of WWIII because of the US strategy and unlimited support of Ukraine.
This is Rasputin’s way of saying he will selectively consider the parts unflattering to the US to be true, and the parts unflattering to Russia to be untrue.My observations:
I think the leaks are real and the documents are real. However, with regards to some of their "intel" with regards to Ukraine, they are relying heavily on information that the Kyiv regime is giving them. This is nothing new. Back in 2015 or so when Jen Psaki was the State Department spokesperson, she got blasted in one of her daily conferences by a reporter for admitting that the info they were getting was coming from Ukrainian social media.
Basically, we don't have diplomats and we don't have intelligence officers.
This is what I don't get. There no reason a state gaurdsman should have access to this info. There are serious issues with security clearances.
Yeah, I’m not sure what the big ‘revelation’ about Zelensky is. Of course he would like to attack Russia.Ukraine needs long-range missiles to destroy Russian bases, depots, etc. in /Crimea./ Doing so would be HUGELY helpful to Ukraine and substantially improve the chances of its coming counter-offense. Right now, Ukraine has almost nothing that reaches deep into Crimea. I'm not sure why the U.S. has refused the long-range missiles. Maybe for the reason you state--but Ukraine's leaders are smart; they're wouldn't do anything stupid to jeopardize their U.S. support.
You do bring up an interesting 'what if', though. Let's say he did stay, faced trial and was imprisoned. Who gets pardoned? Both, Manning only, or neither?
I don't see any way pardoning Manning only would fly. It would have been both or neither.
Agree, I'm also not sure this is work for state gaurdsmen either.The guy's unit was charged with gathering top-secret intelligence from various sources (U.S., Nato, Ukraine, others, I presume) and then packaging it
for senior military/government officials around the world. I've got nothing against young people, but it's a big and sensitive job for a 21-year-old, who indeed could now be facing serious prison time under the Espionage Act, with which he's been charged, for apparently wanting to impress his online gamer friends A hole in the net.