C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 28,891
- Likes
- 50,807
Maybe they’re on the “smartest guy he knows” laptop…..that somehow doesn’t exist.
I thought the penalty for treason was death. I doubt this administration has the tennis balls do go for it unless the guy is related toDumb ass kid.
Gonna rot in jail for some time.
You ignorance is remarkable.
You think you have the "right" to top secret military info.
Do tell why.
Let me make sure I understand your reply. You had a TS and you do think you have a right to classified material access? Or did I read that wrong?Yes.
1. I held a top secret clearance. The majority of “classified” information is the most boring stuff on the planet and over classified.
2. A “democracy” (left wing term for our government, and not accurate but the principle still applies to a republic) “dies in darkness” (NYT?). Meaning without access to info voters cannot make informed decisions
Serious question whether this is an attempt by the intel community to seed a "leak", much like they did with the idea that a rogue Ukrainian group blew up the pipeline.
Interesting. So having a clearance do you remember the two criteria that must be met in order to deem whether you will get access or not? And where that burden of determination lies?
From what I understand is that the leak put Americans and others in grave danger, as well as our capabilities to gather information going further. I hope I am incorrect, but it already sounds worse than Snowden to me.Depending on the nature of the information I would agree. For example Snowden should be pardoned. So far I’ve not seen anything of similar public value from this, but I’ve not looked much either
From your clearance yearly training you’d remember that isn’t up to you to determine. If you have reason to believe classification is being abused there are postings in every compartment and in your training on where to report it.Need to know and I don’t recall the second aspect. But I’m not sure what difference that makes. As voters we have a right to know the majority of the nonsense that is “classified”.
From what I understand is that the leak put Americans and others in grave danger, as well as our capabilities to gather information going further. I hope I am incorrect, but it already sounds worse than Snowden to me.
From your clearance yearly training you’d remember that isn’t up to you to determine. If you have reason to believe classification is being abused there are postings in every compartment and in your training on where to report it.
Specific need to know and having the proper clearance to have access to the material. And the burden falls on the grantor of access not the grantee.
Yep most of what I’ve seen over the years is pretty damn boring. However 50 or so pieces of data boring as stand alone can provide useful information when correlated with the other 49 pieces. Another point that gets hammered home yearly on your training.
The information showed we had assets in the top level of Russian and Chinese military commands (Many other's too, and just the tip of the iceberg as well). These folks aren't too nice with problems. I would expect the good ole communist purge of lots of people. When I have time I'll dig up that info and link it for the folks here.I would want to know exactly what it was they endangered people. It’s too easy of an excuse. They’re just taking the textbook definition of the classification level and saying by definition it causes harm would be my guess. I would want specifics. Depending on specifics I may agree with you.