iceman9
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,394
- Likes
- 12
While Dems should walk away big time, just by the shear math of D's to R's, and with history on their side as well. I would say unless they run together, can't see them winning "big" with the massive negatives they've aquired thru this process. If HRC gets the nod over BHO with the super-delegates help, the black vote will be non- existant. BHO holds on gets the nod in the end, I seriously doubt he gets any of the "Reagan Dems", when you've got a moderate like McCain running. Can he win with just the black vote, and how many young people show up on election day. With this, the craziest election process ever, anything can happen, no doubt. But with these choices, I can't see anyone running away and hiding with this election.
That's not true either. He's close, but he still doesn't have the lowest approval rating ever. Harry Truman (22%) and Richard Nixon (24%) have the lowest approval ratings ever recorded.
WASHINGTON DC (CNN) -- A new poll suggests that President Bush is the most unpopular president in modern American history.
care to help me understand how EVERYONE got that idea? I guess you can easily explain to me currency pricing. Thanks.
Much has been made of the United States’ astonishing deficit spending in the first half of this decade, and also of the rapid decline of the value of the U.S. dollar, but not everyone wants to draw the link between the two. Historically and in the present case, deficit spending is the main cause of currency declines, and in a much smaller way, the decline in currency adds to the budget deficit.
To get the bigger picture, you need to see the cause of the deficit spending. Some would want to blame the Bush tax cuts, but while those tax cuts are certainly hurting the U.S. economy, they are not nearly large enough to account for the deficits we are seeing. This is a deficit caused by deficit spending, and specifically, spending on the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.
They can explain it better then I can:
http://citizine.net/commentary/commentary-0801_economy-rickaster.htm
that wasn't an explanation, that was a political commentary.They can explain it better then I can:
http://citizine.net/commentary/commentary-0801_economy-rickaster.htm
that wasn't an explanation, that was a political commentary.
Historically and in the present case, deficit spending is the main cause of currency declines, and in a much smaller way, the decline in currency adds to the budget deficit.
This is a deficit caused by deficit spending, and specifically, spending on the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.
you're telling me that you want me to buy just that statement from a biased source? We had tremendous deficit spending for the 20 years prior to today and tell me how that impacted the dollar?what part of did you miss?