The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

You can always say, "I'm just pointing out hypocrisy," when employing a "what-about-ism." The objective of deflection, is the same, however.
Where is the deflection? You literally started this discussion on partisan hypocrisy with this post:
There is no way that you play dumb like this, if it involved a Democrat. It's annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Where is the deflection? You literally started this discussion on partisan hypocrisy with this post:
I was making an accusation of partisanship, but that wasn't a "what-about-ism." I didn't mention any specific examples or try to deflect the topic to someone else.
 
I was making an accusation of partisanship, but that wasn't a "what-about-ism." I didn't mention any specific examples or try to deflect the topic to someone else.
I never accused you of a "whataboutism".

Frankly, it's silly to see you, a well-known partisan on this board, lecturing other people on partisanship. That statement and hill's aren't whataboutisms as they tie directly into the conversation and consequently aren't deflections. AM64 was never pretending to be something he isn't, unlike you.
 
FDR screwed around on Eleanor, there’s not telling how many presidents messed around on their wives.
Yes, but that was an arranged marriage, which neither one wanted any part of. They were fifth cousins, once removed. Eleanor was a lesbian.

* In a 4th grade history class at West Hills Elementary, I was sent to the principal's office for including this info in a research paper ... even though I had properly cited legitimate sources for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Yes, but that was an arranged marriage, which neither one wanted any part of. They were fifth cousins, once removed. Eleanor was a lesbian.

* In a 4th grade history class at West Hills Elementary, I was sent to the principal's office for including this info in a research paper ... even though I had properly cited legitimate sources for it.

Yeaaah sure you did.
 
LOL. That's a little harsh, don't you think?
No it's not. I have watched you and other liberal posters get on your soap box and lecture other posters about trump. Yet you all give Clinton a massive pass. You are no different than those you are lecturing. Lying partisan hack. You are dishonest if you think trump has done anything as bad as Clinton. Hell you guys still struggling with admitting what he did. You called it "technically" harassment. You routinely ignore the FACT he committed perjury. It's not whataboutism between them. It's whataboutism with you being intellectually honest.
 
Last edited:
:) The loons are doing a great job with Trump's re-election contributions pouring in.


Has the thought crossed your mind, that the loons would like to see Trump win the Republican Party nomination in 2024?

It's the same thing that happened after Trump's 1st impeachment in December of 2019. His campaign contributions skyrocketed, and his poll numbers went up too (for about a month) .... but it didn't help him with independent voters in the general election. The cake is baked with Trump. 47% of the popular vote is his ceiling. That's great in the primary, but it's not enough in the general.
 
Has the thought crossed your mind, that the loons would like to see Trump win the Republican Party nomination in 2024?

It's the same thing that happened after Trump's 1st impeachment in December of 2019. His campaign contributions skyrocketed, and his poll numbers went up too (for about a month) .... but it didn't help him with independent voters in the general election. The cake is baked with Trump. 47% of the popular vote is his ceiling. That's great in the primary, but it's not enough in the general.

You called you and your party loons
🤣
 
Has the thought crossed your mind, that the loons would like to see Trump win the Republican Party nomination in 2024?

It's the same thing that happened after Trump's 1st impeachment in December of 2019. His campaign contributions skyrocketed, and his poll numbers went up too (for about a month) .... but it didn't help him with independent voters in the general election. The cake is baked with Trump. 47% of the popular vote is his ceiling. That's great in the primary, but it's not enough in the general.
I actually agree with you here. Trump has no shot in a general election. Only candidate a Biden/Harris ticket can and will beat, imo.
 
Also, Eleanor Roosevelt and Lorena Hickok lived together for most of the 12 years that FDR was President. She spent very little time at the White House ... and Dwight D. Eisenhower banged his limo driver while President too.
 

VN Store



Back
Top