The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

stay-strong-dont-cry.gif
We had a nice run. All good things come to an end.
 
If something happened and Trump keeled over dead, would the Dems let it go, or would they try and convict a dead man?
Dead people don't pay bills, so which side caves first. MTG seems to think he would rise from the grave on the 3rd day. Not a whole lot for the Democrats to accomplish if he were dead. Just make them look like idiots.
 
Do you have an issue with 3 indictments of Biden’s main political opponent and only 1 of 3 seeming to have any actual legs to it?

In order,

I don't know enough about the NY tax evasion charges to know if they "have legs."

I think, and have always thought actually, that the documents charge was the cleanest cut, easiest to prove, slam dunk of all of them.

The most recent indictment my concern, as above, is awfully hard to prove state of mind in a vacuum and circumstantially relying on how others perceived what he knew and did not know. Much easier to prove that in the documents case, especially with the audio tape.

Caveat: a number of prosecutor experts on shows last night commented that they suspect that the prosecution has some cards yet to play, and they may get at that specific issue. If there is some irrefutable proof that he acknowledged that he lost and he continued the charade anyway (not thought he may have lot, probably lost, but definitely lost) then the people that should be really angry with him are sitting in jail cells right now for their roles in 1/6.
 
Rich coming from a guy that supports the candidate that is known to wear depends.

The guy supposedly do-doed in his pants during a meeting with the Pope and left for an hour like he had the runs.

Then he let one fly in front of the Dutchess so bad that she reported it. It wasn't even silent but deadly so he could blame it on someone else then quietly leave while snickering to himself like he got away.
 
The guy supposedly do-doed in his pants during a meeting with the Pope and left for an hour like he had the runs.

Then he let one fly in front of the Dutchess so bad that she reported it. It wasn't even silent but deadly so he could blame it on someone else then quietly leave while snickering to himself like he got away.
hence the nickname Dark
 
After reading the indictment I think they are a tossup, or that Trump may be favored to win.

He can say he listened to his lawyers, he can say he really believed he won, he can say that he never intended that the fake electoral ballots be submitted unless he won in court and somebody took it upon themselves to do that.

Maybe they have evidence to refute all of that and it just isn’t in the indictment, but just based on what is there those seem like plausible defenses.

Proof and seriousness are two “no ****” metrics for evaluating a criminal case. This is more serious than the Mar-A-Lago case, in my opinion, but less clear that the elements of a crime can be proven.
What about Trump calling Barr and telling him and his deputy to overturn the election by claiming fraud? Then telling Barr he and Republican congressmen would take it from there? Calling Barr a second time and threatening to fire him if he didn't do it? Then when Barr wouldn't do it, sending a guy to fire Barr? Of course Barr chased the guy out of his office.
 
I’m watching watching a briefing by Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba. Granted, the TV is muted, but as far as I’m concerned, he’s not guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and volfanhill

VN Store



Back
Top