The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[volgr]

Good tweeter thread by Pedro and the anti-Trumpers will enjoy because it does a good job showing how Trump is allegedly grifting his base....

 

[lawgator1]

A trove.

A bombshell report.




I'm sensing a pattern here ..

 

[luthervol]

Because they don’t have their heads stuck up their a**

For a teacher you ask easy questions. Too bad I wasn’t in one of your classes. Oh all the continuum lectures I missed out on. Sad.

Seeing the level at which a student understands the question is always informative.

 

[volinbham]

A trove.

A bombshell report.




I'm sensing a pattern here ..

like we've heard since 2016?

 

[Sea Ray]

That's insane........no one has ever taken that position. The right trying to frame it that way is just one more example of how they manipulate the unthinking.

Sure they did. That's what Me Too was all about

 

[lawgator1]

like we've heard since 2016?

With all the far right media folks climbing over each other for clicks from the same blob of true believers you'd think they'd come up with some new hyperbole to peddle their claims.

 

[hog88]

With all the far right media folks climbing over each other for clicks from the same blob of true believers you'd think they'd come up with some new hyperbole to peddle their claims.

LOL

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[luthervol]

Here's a mental exercise maybe worth taking:
You ask 1,000 randomly selected republicans, "Do you feel that the democratic party is trying to destroy America?"

You ask 1,000 randomly selected democrats, "Do you feel that the republican party is trying to destroy America?"

What would be your estimates of the the results?
Republicans: _______% would answer yes.
Democrats: _______% would answer yes.

 

[luthervol]

Sure they did. That's what Me Too was all about

You have a critically distorted view of what Me Too was all about.
How in the world did that happen? Rhetorical, we know, and once again that highlights the major source of the problem.

 

[Sea Ray]

You have a critically distorted view of what Me Too was all about.
How in the world did that happen? We know, and once again that highlights the major source of the problem.

Clinton tweeted in September that every sexual assault survivor had “the right to be believed.”

https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-bo...de-edits-to-campus-sexual-assault-page-after/

 

[lawgator1]

Here's a mental exercise maybe worth taking:
You ask 1,000 randomly selected republicans, "Do you feel that the democratic party is trying to destroy America?"

You ask 1,000 randomly selected democrats, "Do you feel that the republican party is trying to destroy America?"

What would be your estimates of the the results?
Republicans: __90_____% would answer yes.
Democrats: ___35____% would answer yes.

 

[OrangeTsar]

It's not an either or, it's a continuum. Like with most everything.

Except that the Democrat slogan is (and I quote) „believe ALL women“.
Doesn’t leave room for much of a continuum now does it?

 

[luthervol]

https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-bo...de-edits-to-campus-sexual-assault-page-after/

The right to be believed........at least enough to warrant further investigation.

But even your source "The Hill", is showing the right-wing propaganda slant.

 

[OrangeTsar]

People see the US sinking fast and they are looking for a savior to right the ship, whether it be Obama or Trump, but in truth it is likely past the point of saving.

That’s just because I haven’t announced MY candidacy yet

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

The right to be believed........at least enough to warrant further investigation.

But even your source "The Hill", is showing the right-wing propaganda slant.

Clown you are. You're so closed minded to facts. So, you only read far-left wing propaganda.

 

[luthervol]

Mine would be similar. Certainly the republican % would be more than double that of the Dems.

I wish a few on here would actually sit back and process what that means, how it came about, and the future implications.

Maybe their refusal to answer is a sign that they are actually thinking, and not comfortable with the result.

 

[evillawyer]

Get your facts straight "bitches"

That's alright. Gives us longer for party planning, b*tches!

 

[kiddiedoc]

Currently, it is much easier and more effective to give reasons to vote against the "other candidate" than it is to give reasons to vote for "this candidate".

Correct, which is how we've gotten to where we are today. It's lazy politics. The only positive energy is wasted on stupid ideas like changing people's gender, cow farts, and making sure women can kill as many babies as possible. Rather than producing a candidate that might bring the country together and focus on issues that are actually vital to the nation, both parties seem intent on attacking and destroying the other, at any cost, with the all important grand prize of POWER.

 

[OrangeTsar]

The right to be believed........at least enough to warrant further investigation.

But even your source "The Hill", is showing the right-wing propaganda slant.

„Further investigation“. Cool!
So when does Biden unseal his Senatorial records at the University of Delaware so we can investigate Ms Rede‘s claims?

 

[VOLS INC.]

Class is in session fellas. I’m learning so much!


Like if you literally quote something that was posted, then later removed from a Democrats campaign website, the information being communicated (from the Democrats website btw) is defined as “Right wing propaganda”. And the site reporting the information are right wing propagandist.

Brilliant!

 

[luthervol]

Class is in session fellas. I’m learning so much!


Like if you literally quote something that was posted, then later removed from a Democrats campaign website, the information being communicated (from the Democrats website btw) is defined as “Right wing propaganda”.

Brilliant!

It was a small part of a larger quote that they knew would be taken out of context and used as right-wing propaganda - which amazingly enough, is exactly what happen.

How about this. You tell me what you actually think she meant when she said ".......had the right to be believed....."

This should be interesting.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Here's a mental exercise maybe worth taking:
You ask 1,000 randomly selected republicans, "Do you feel that the democratic party is trying to destroy America?"

You ask 1,000 randomly selected democrats, "Do you feel that the republican party is trying to destroy America?"

What would be your estimates of the the results?
Republicans: _______% would answer yes.
Democrats: _______% would answer yes.

It is hilarious to see a reference to a „mental exercise“ from an adherent of the political party that gives us gems such as this

 

[lawgator1]

Mine would be similar. Certainly the republican % will be more than double that of the Dems.

I wish a few on here would actually sit back and process what that means, how it came about, and the future implications.

I really think its a function of a shrinking ideologic base for the GOP. The Republican party USED to be about 3 things:

1) Fiscal restraint;

2) Deregulation and lower taxes on builders of wealth; and

3) A strong national defense.

You can trace those things back to Reagan, a bit less strongly in Bush I, and less and less in Bush II. Still there, but waning.

But look at the GOP now. Its culture wars, waving around immigration and woke and transgender and defund police slogans to apply to the the Dems. They have in the last ten years spent as much, if not more, than the Dems. They drifting toward an appease Russia position.

Today its not about oil drilling. Its about which candidate for the GOP nomination can have the most success banning drag shows. They are already losing the popular vote by wider and wider margins. Its just going to get worse as long as they allow petty resentments to dictate the direction of the GOP.

 

[volinbham]

With all the far right media folks climbing over each other for clicks from the same blob of true believers you'd think they'd come up with some new hyperbole to peddle their claims.

oh the irony