The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2


There are 15 judges on DC appellate court. Yet 2 judges—Pan (Biden) and Pillard (Obama)—just happened to be selected on 3-judge panels in critical decisions related to J6 and Trump. Oh and the chief judge—who replaced Merrick Garland—also is an Obama appointee.

Sort of amazing how the same 2 Dem appointed judges—Florence Pan and Cornelia Pillard, who barely survived Senate confirmation in 2013—keep ending up on “randomly” selected panels for J6 cases.

Pillard was on one of 2 panels in 1512c2 appeal for J6 defendant; Twitter appeal for Trump’s data; and appeal to obtain records of Evan Corcoran, Trump’s lawyer, in classified docs case.

She sided with DOJ in each matter. Now she’s on panel for Trump’s gag order appeal.

So maybe someone can explain how Pillard can sit on appellate panel when her husband, who works for ACLU, filed amicus brief (denied by Judge Chutkan) AGAINST gag order?Lol what? Something up.

Appeals Court Freezes Trump Gag Order Issued By Out-Of-Control Woke Judge

If it's any indication of how radical-left Judge Chutkan is, two of the appeals court judges are Obama appointees, and one is a Biden appointee.


Appeals court temporarily lifts Trump gag order in D.C. case

The D.C. Circuit set oral arguments on the gag order issue for Nov. 20. The panel issuing the order consisted of two Obama appointees — Patricia Millett and Cornelia Pillard — as well as the court’s newest member, Biden appointee Bradley Garcia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

Trump Prosecutors Putting Up A Fight To Keep Cameras Out Of Courtroom​

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.

Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.


Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.

House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”

 

Trump Prosecutors Putting Up A Fight To Keep Cameras Out Of Courtroom​

Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge on Friday to bar media outlets from televising the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, DC.

Last month, attorneys for a coalition of news organizations, including NBCUniversal, asked United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan to make an exception to the longstanding rule that prohibits broadcasting and photographing criminal proceedings in federal courts under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure.


Prosecutors are trying to uphold the rule that states, “the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings” or broadcasting those proceedings unless a judge rules otherwise.

House Democrats have also pushed for live broadcasting of the court proceedings in the criminal cases against Trump. The former president's defense attorney John Lauro agrees, telling Fox News Sunday in August he “would love to see that.”

So everybody wants it but the prosecutor. Would make great tv and I would be glued.
 
Not if he believe he is protecting the integrity of the federal election
Yeah but that’s the same slippery slope as the people forcing lockdowns, vaccine mandates, etc. in the name of public safety. Some of the most dangerous words you can hear from someone in power is they are doing something for “the greater good”.
 

The New York Times
Trump Indictments Haven’t Sunk His Campaign, but a Conviction Might
Jonathan Swan
Mon, November 6, 2023 at 7:21 AM CST


NYT admits this is all fake, all a witch hunt for no other reaosn than to try and keep Trump from running and winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Jack Poso 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
19h

Judge asks Trump about his Aberdeen lands

Trump: “I have a castle. At some point, maybe in my very old age, I'll go there and do the most beautiful thing you've ever seen”
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT

Trump's Troubles Might Only Be A Problem For Biden​


Former President Donald Trump will be traveling between the courtroom and the campaign trail as he seeks a return to the White House in 2024, but that may only cause problems for President Joe Biden.

Trump, who is currently the front-runner in the Republican presidential primary, testified at his New York fraud trial on Monday fresh off the release of a New York Times-Siena College poll that shows him leading Biden, who is expected to be the Democratic nominee in 2024. Trump's legal troubles have not damaged his campaign so far, though, as is evident by the polling.


The stark poll numbers come as Trump faces various legal cases in three states and Washington, D.C. The former president was federally indicted on charges related to alleged mishandling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election in Florida and Washington, D.C., respectively. He also faces a case in New York City for alleged falsification of business documents, charges in Fulton County, Georgia, for racketeering, and a civil fraud trial in the Empire State.

A report from Politico last week said that a conservative group opposing Trump had attempted to cut ads emphasizing Trump's legal problems, but when tested, they failed and helped Trump. The ads from Win It Back PAC remain unaired, with three of four boosting Trump's support and the other one having "no measurable impact."

 
  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey

VN Store



Back
Top