davethevol
Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful......
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Messages
- 17,544
- Likes
- 21,541
No. I asked a question. That's all. Go back and look. I voted for Haley in the primary. Develop some interest in nuance.You speak just like the weak-minded man you hate..do you not see it..your literally started this entire conversation by throwing out insults and then when pointing out the DJT does the same thing as you..just do you and keep on truckin... in the end your right we are bonded by the Vols and despite other differences that speaks volumes more. If I drank beer I'd probably take you up on it. Btw I vote for Ramaswamy in the primary.
I couldn’t get past Pecker knowing someone has a small staff. I’m too immature.Either ABC OR USA Today is lying...
Pecker testified that he promised to be "eyes and ears" because he knew the Trump Organization had a "very small staff." Pecker said he promised that, if he heard anything negative about Trump or anything about women selling stories, he would notify Michael Cohen, as he did over the last several years.
Edit - Appears to be semantics. The paying did not happen until 2016 but the relationship existed much longer.....
And I bet he still wins. He shouldn’t but I think he will.Puddinhead now has a record, the is no George Floyd the marxist can blame on Trump as the US being out of control (notice how legacy regime media refuse to cover the terrorism marches were seeing) or Covid to keep Puddinhead in the basement.
It’s likely overreach, as most have agreed, but NY is well within their right to pick up something the Feds drop. I was involved in a Federal felony case where the Feds were willing to drop the charges. However, the state could’ve then picked it up and likely would have so the better play was to give the Feds a win with a misdemeanor conviction and probation.Yes, Trump committed misdemeanors in which the SoL had expired. So, this should have never been brought to trial. It's an absolute abuse of the NY justice system to charge him with felonies the DOJ passed on.
Bless your heart. You're extremely misguided if you believe your defense of Trump is a plausible defense for fairness. You make too many comments in his defense that are factually incorrect. You've defended his morality. It's almost comical, except that your serious. Your comments about him would be highly credible as sarcasm, but that's not the case.I defend fairness.