The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#17,302
#17,302
lawgator1 said:
What the Fox talking heads always omit is the overwhelming corroborating evidence to Cohen's version of events.
Click to expand...


It's over man. Just pack up the laptop in the satchel, put the papers in the suitcase and snap the locks, and say nothing further your honor.
 
#17,304
#17,304
lawgator1 said:
You just don't want to admit that the payment wasn't for legal services, but was reimbursement to Cohen for making the payment.
Click to expand...

But you can say the reimbursement to Cohen was for legal expenses that Cohen paid...

But you can't say that reimbursement was for a legal services performed in 2017 when no legal services were performed in 2017 and no retainer actually existed...
 
#17,309
#17,309
I will repeat. The Dems are violating the law. They waited several years for all these trials, yet couldnt wait another 6-12 months.

Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department’s mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution. See § 9-27.260. Any action likely to raise an issue or the perception of an issue under this provision requires consultation with the Public Integrity Section, and such action shall not be taken if the Public Integrity Section advises that further consultation is required with the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol and davethevol
#17,312
#17,312
lawgator1 said:
It is a crime in New York to cook the books to hide it.

If you believe that Trump worked with Cohen to pay her off, using the National Enquirer catch and kill mechanism they had so often before and that the purposes was to hide the payment so as to shield him politically, then it is reasonable to infer that when it came time to document the payment, i.e. to reimburse Cohen, then it was done in such a manner and with Trump's knowledge that it was being called a "legal expense," so as to prevent anyone who might see it from knowing it was a payoff to her to keep her trap shut as Trump ran for office.

Its not even the slightest bit hard to believe. In fact, it seems obvious.

Now, you want to argue that the witnesses have credibility problems and so you cannot know it beyond a reasonable doubt? Ok, argue that. Maybe you will be right and they will acquit. But just because OJ wasn't convicted doesn't mean he did not in fact murder Simpson and the boyfriend.

From a political standpoint, there are obviously millions of Trump supporters willing to overlook the entirety of it -- cheating on his wife with a porn star, buying her story, hiding the payments -- so that they can instead focus on their resentments about the changing demographics around them, or the price of milk or gas, or whatever daily grievance Trump can tap into.

Just don't come crying to me if he gets elected and throws the country into one constitutional crisis after another because he mad.
Click to expand...

It's over man.

I know, I know. It's never over even if you have to take matters in your own hands. You would probably leapfrog security to tackle the man.

I get the feeling your tackling skills are like Deon's whiffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#17,315
#17,315
lawgator1 said:
It is a crime in New York to cook the books to hide it.

If you believe that Trump worked with Cohen to pay her off, using the National Enquirer catch and kill mechanism they had so often before and that the purposes was to hide the payment so as to shield him politically, then it is reasonable to infer that when it came time to document the payment, i.e. to reimburse Cohen, then it was done in such a manner and with Trump's knowledge that it was being called a "legal expense," so as to prevent anyone who might see it from knowing it was a payoff to her to keep her trap shut as Trump ran for office.

Its not even the slightest bit hard to believe. In fact, it seems obvious.

Now, you want to argue that the witnesses have credibility problems and so you cannot know it beyond a reasonable doubt? Ok, argue that. Maybe you will be right and they will acquit. But just because OJ wasn't convicted doesn't mean he did not in fact murder Simpson and the boyfriend.

From a political standpoint, there are obviously millions of Trump supporters willing to overlook the entirety of it -- cheating on his wife with a porn star, buying her story, hiding the payments -- so that they can instead focus on their resentments about the changing demographics around them, or the price of milk or gas, or whatever daily grievance Trump can tap into.

Just don't come crying to me if he gets elected and throws the country into one constitutional crisis after another because he mad.
Click to expand...
LOL
 
#17,318
#17,318
VolTull said:
House Democrats launch investigation into Trump’s alleged offers to oil executives
Click to expand...
iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#17,319
#17,319
BreatheUT said:
It's over man.

I know, I know. It's never over even if you have to take matters in your own hands. You would probably leapfrog security to tackle the man.

I get the feeling your tackling skills are like Deon's whiffs.
Click to expand...


Gotta love Trumpster reasoning:

He's going to win !! And it will be the right result !

But if he loses that result is illegitimate.


Remind you of anything ? 2020 election maybe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#17,323
#17,323
VolTull said:
The Trump people don't care about anything other than themselves and what Trump can "do" LOL for them.

Which they haven't yet figured out is...wait for it...

NOTHING
Click to expand...
Not true. He can trigger the democrats! Or really, anyone who cares about democracy.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top