The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#17,428
#17,428
lawgator1 said:
Yes, this was unique to Trump. My point was, any lawyer representing Trump that does not insist on iron-clad means of protecting themselves, is a complete idiot.

The countryside is littered with their corpses, as is.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind that associating with Trump prior to 2014 or 2016 (I say 2014 because he started getting involved with Politics regarding Obama's birth certificate demands) was a big win. There wasn't any question.

You feel the way you do because of a charged media and ironically, I doubt Trump would have the power that he has today if not for his critics and the haters. I really think that MAGA feeds off the hate and if you guys just calmed down and ignored him, he would probably not have the power and support base he has today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#17,429
#17,429
volbound1700 said:
Keep in mind that associating with Trump prior to 2014 or 2016 (I say 2014 because he started getting involved with Politics regarding Obama's birth certificate demands) was a big win. There wasn't any question.

You feel the way you do because of a charged media and ironically, I doubt Trump would have the power that he has today if not for his critics and the haters. I really think that MAGA feeds off the hate and if you guys just calmed down and ignored him, he would probably not have the power and support base he has today.
Click to expand...

Hate is to MAGA what nuclear energy is to Godzilla. Just keep on producing it.
 
#17,432
#17,432
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#17,434
#17,434
  • Like
Reactions: JOEY’S ALL VOL !!!, Vol737, BreatheUT and 1 other person
#17,435
#17,435
volbound1700 said:
I doubt Trump would have the power that he has today if not for his critics and the haters. I really think that MAGA feeds off the hate and if you guys just calmed down and ignored him, he would probably not have the power and support base he has today.
Click to expand...
Sure, it's our fault

Bad, VolTull, bad.

lol
 
#17,441
#17,441
turbovol said:
Cohen's testimony in this trial is obviously truthful because it's logically truthful. Of course the gangster didn't want a porn star going public with a story of having sex with him two/three weeks before the election. Of course he'd tried to buy her silence and cover up a scandal that might cost him the election. DUH. One doesn't need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that. Anybody--including jurors--who'd think that Cohen would pay a woman $130,000 of his own money to a porn star who had (bad) sex with trump without the gangster's knowledge would have to be a genuine moron on par with the jurors in the OJ Simpson case. The facts of the case are patently obvious.
Click to expand...
Stop using words you don’t understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and Vol737
#17,446
#17,446
85SugarVol said:
What do you make of Cohen’s testimony regarding the phone call?
Click to expand...


Have only heard some news reports so kind of unclear to me. Basically Trump people say he got caught lying, anti Trump say he got caught with a faulty memory on an inconsequential point.

So, as one would expect.
 
#17,447
#17,447
lawgator1 said:
Have only heard some news reports so kind of unclear to me. Basically Trump people say he got caught lying, anti Trump say he got caught with a faulty memory on an inconsequential point.

So, as one would expect.
Click to expand...
CNN said that “phone call” was essentially the basis for elevating the misdemeanor (of which he is guilty) to felony.

Looks like he was caught lying about the substance of the phone call. Seems like more than an inconsequential point? 🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and whodeycin85
#17,448
#17,448
85SugarVol said:
CNN said that “phone call” was essentially the basis for elevating the misdemeanor (of which he is guilty) to felony.

Looks like he was caught lying about the substance of the phone call. Seems like more than an inconsequential point? 🤷‍♀️
Click to expand...


I've had a chance to see some coverage. 96 seconds is a long time. Don't see why they could not have discussed both the harassing calls and the payment. Seems like it's only because of the drama of defense counsel that it's even a topic of conversation.
 
#17,450
#17,450
lawgator1 said:
I've had a chance to see some coverage. 96 seconds is a long time. Don't see why they could not have discussed both the harassing calls and the payment. Seems like it's only because of the drama of defense counsel that it's even a topic of conversation.
Click to expand...
Your wife is just being nice to you. 96 seconds isn't that long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002, StarRaider, BigOrangeMojo and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top