The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[luthervol]

It is wrong, check the polling, still not the point.

You’re advocating for your opponent to be gutted - in the name of unity lol.

Wait… what definition of “unity” are you using?

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

 

[luthervol]

Why would you think that its only necessary for one? Get your own house in order first.

Sure. Like I always say, take care of it in the primaries.

 

[volfanhill]

Say what you will about Clinton, he was the last President to actually make an effort to get along with the opposition party. He was quite liberal, but he knew when to move toward the center when the situation demanded it.

He moved when polling info said he needed to

 

[hog88]

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

In other words once the Republican Party thinks like you do.

 

[Cod]

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

The Democrats are too far left, I see it getting worse before better.

 

[OrangeTsar]

It's not a vendetta for me. A man who will lie to his wife straight in the eye, will certainly lie to me.

Both are awful humans. Why should I want to be led by a person who I KNOW 100% has zero integrity on the most personal level.

I'll cheat on my wife, but I'd never cheat on the people of the United States? You're dreaming.

And you think Mr “I finished first in my law class” Biden doesn’t look you straight in the eye and lie Multiple times each week?
Oh and “inflation was 9% when I took office”? You mister personal integrity right there for sure.

 

[OrangeTsar]

I'll cheat on my wife, but I'd never cheat on the people of the United States? You're dreaming.

So you would refuse to vote for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and William Jefferson Clinton then?

 

[hog88]

So you would refuse to vote for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and William Jefferson Clinton then?

I wouldn’t vote for either. He’s right, if you’ll cheat on your spouse how can I trust you?

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

Say what you will about Clinton, he was the last President to actually make an effort to get along with the opposition party. He was quite liberal, but he knew when to move toward the center when the situation demanded it.

Meh. He was a snake, personally and politically.

He'd have sold out his kid to get that second term, IMO. His business dealings, like Trumps, are full of cheating, lies, and low life people who end up either dead or in prison, again just like Trump.

I don't have a vendetta against either one but I'm not going to call balls and strikes differently just because of tribal allegiance.

 

[OrangeTsar]

He moved when polling info said he needed to

Which is actually more than most other recent politicians have been able to say. Clinton was at least a skillful politician. Politicians SHOULD pay some attention to the polls if they purport to represent all Americans

 

[OrangeTsar]

I wouldn’t vote for either. He’s right, if you’ll cheat on your spouse how can I trust you?

Thank you for your honest answer

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

So you would refuse to vote for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and William Jefferson Clinton then?

Absolutely. Kennedy was a POS AND the entire media and other govt officials let him do whatever he wanted.

His Dad was a POS before him.

And he likely DID steal the election in Chicago.

 

[luthervol]

In other words once the Republican Party thinks like you do.

Not at all. I've never thought like the republican party - beyond some basic common sense tenets.
A couple being that compromise is at times necessary and the other side should not be viewed as an enemy to be defeated.

 

[85SugarVol]

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

Yes, a majority reject the notion of Israel existing. A complete annihilation of the Israeli State. But anyway.

Once your opponent completely guts itself, and is remade in your image - then there can be unity.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Meh. He was a snake, personally and politically.

He'd have sold out his kid to get that second term, IMO. His business dealings, like Trumps, are full of cheating, lies, and low life people who end up either dead or in prison, again just like Trump.

I don't have a vendetta against either one but I'm not going to call balls and strikes differently just because of tribal allegiance.

So who are you voting for then?

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

And you think Mr “I finished first in my law class” Biden doesn’t look you straight in the eye and lie Multiple times each week?
Oh and “inflation was 9% when I took office”? You mister personal integrity right there for sure.

Didn't bring up Biden.

As far as I know, he's got more personal integrity than Trump, though his conduct with young girls is very bizarre. He'd lie for political purposes but I'm honestly doubtful he'd lie to his wife.

He absolutely sucks at the job and is likely is too senile for the job and should not have the job.

 

[utvolpj]

I did. Maybe you need to focus on my carefully chosen word "annihilation". But still not the point.

Once the republican party (the opponent) rejects trumpsim, the two opponents can and will work to unify.

There should be no unity with the far left driving your party. That's a sure path to destruction

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Didn't bring up Biden.

As far as I know, he's got more personal integrity than Trump, though his conduct with young girls is very bizarre. He'd lie for political purposes but I'm honestly doubtful he'd lie to his wife.

He absolutely sucks at the job and is likely is too senile for the job and should not have the job.

You do know when Dr Jill came from don't you?

 

[WoodsmanVol]

I prefer Lincoln not shred the Constitution and destroy our Republic by invading sovereign States. None of that has anything to do with slavery.

"None of that has anything to do with slavery" you're a Trumpian liar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And you know it. You're counting on me being another under or uneducated person subdued by the myth of White, is right. You're ringing the wrong doorbell mVolgr,

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

So who are you voting for then?

I'll look at my options when the ballot gets solidified.

I pray that my choices will not be Biden and Trump, without having to write in a better candidate, but like last time...... I'm doubtful.

 

[NashVol11]

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

You do know when Dr Jill came from don't you?

Again, not remarkably concerned with Biden.

I'm doubtful he's a bigger snake than Bill or Donald, personally. Politically, he's completely embedded in the system, which isn't good for America.

Trump's only appeal is that he isn't, but he's an absolute train wreck of a human being.

 

[volgr]

"None of that has anything to do with slavery" you're a Trumpian liar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And you know it. You're counting on me being another under or uneducated person subdued by the myth of White, is right. You're ringing the wrong doorbell mVolgr,

Your confident stupidity is entertaining.

 

[utvolpj]

Didn't bring up Biden.

As far as I know, he's got more personal integrity than Trump, though his conduct with young girls is very bizarre. He'd lie for political purposes but I'm honestly doubtful he'd lie to his wife.

He absolutely sucks at the job and is likely is too senile for the job and should not have the job.

He started dating his current wife when she was married. He claims the man who was in the wreck with his first wife was drunk and at fault. He lies about and uses the death of his son for political purposes. He's been accused of sexual assault quite a few times as well.

Can you explain his personal integrity again?