milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 29
This is the way I see it... I can sympathize a bit, I'm usually that guy. I think Phil is a genuinely nice dude. I'd like to see him win.
I've always had the feelig that underneath all the media hype, there lies an egotistical jackass.
Mickelson has earned many nicknames on the Tour, but our favorite is FIGJAM ... "There are a bunch of pros who think he and his whole smiley, happy face are a fraud," another reporter says. "They think he's preening and insincere."
Length is absolutely a huge issue regardless if it's playing hard and fast. It's a big difference when the big hitters have short irons into THESE greens vs the average and short drivers having mid to long irons into them.
Length is an advantage but not so much that the shorter guys won't have a chance this week. If you're not making the 6-8 foot putts for par it won't matter how far you hit it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
According to Tom Watson, accurate iron play is the single most critical element to shooting good scores at Augusta. There are LOTS of 6-8 footers at Augusta that aren't going to be made due to the defensive nature that some of them must be struck. The course is playing so long now, a 290 yard drive still might leave a
4 iron approach. The guys that can bomb it are hitting 7-8 iron on the same hole. It's a lot easier to hit a seven iron where you want it on the green than it is a 4 iron, ESPECIALLY when the greens are as hard as your driveway.
I understand what you're saying but guys are gonna be playing defensive no matter what club they're hitting especially on the 3's & 4's. You have to cash in on the par 5's & scrape a birdie here & there. Only 1 par 3 & 2 par 4's are what I would call birdie holes depending on the pin placement & that's 3 & 6 & 7.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I agree. Watson and Mickleson are way off the mark here. Where do those guys get off dropping such useless information like that?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
ESPN is airing a great documentary right now chronicling Jack Nicklaus hole by hole at the 86 Masters. They're about to go to 16 with him still trailing Seve by 2 shots.
He hunched way over. His feet and shoulders were wide open. His hands moved. And that day he used a god awful supersized Macgregor Response putter . . . yet in his prime he was one of the greatest putters ever.Watching it now. Good stuff. This was before I started playing golf, but the putting stroke intrigues me. It seems that today's teachers take the hands out of the stroke, but Jack sure did use his hands quite a bit.
He hunched way over. His feet and shoulders were wide open. His hands moved. And that day he used a god awful supersized Macgregor Response putter . . . yet in his prime he was one of the greatest putters ever.
Supposedly, that putter was a complete bust and Macgregor was in financial trouble . . . and then Nicklaus won the Masters and they sold a ton of putters.
Funny article about the Response putter. Apparently Nicklaus isn't particularly sentimental or vain about commemorating his equipment.I hadn't heard that story but I did buy the putter later on though, found it in a local golf shop in 88' maybe, played maybe 3 rounds with it, hated it, had Dad put it in a garage sale where he unloaded it for $ 8.00
Funny article about the Response putter. Apparently Nicklaus isn't particularly sentimental or vain about commemorating his equipment.
Putter safe in history, not in garage 040606
It was the thing back then. I pulled out an old Ping Anser the other day and it was shocking how light it was.Waffle iron ... lol:
The light weight of the thing is exactly what I hated about it, you pick this monster up expecting it to be heavy and it has no weight, it was like a Fat Albert wiffleball bat.