The Next Trump Crisis

Have I said one time in any post that I care about the deficit? You made the statement the the deficit will collapse the nation . I rolled with it and asked you have you seen the lefts proposals which you ignore as just talk .
No I said the debt would and you moved to deficits.

I don't care about proposals made to get elected and I'm constantly told that is correct by the righties on here
 
No I said the debt would and you moved to deficits.

I don't care about proposals made to get elected and I'm constantly told that is correct by the righties on here

You are in an election year and you don’t care about the proposals from candidates trying to become POTUS ? That’s new and definitely a different way to go into it .
 
That is not what I said . But I do believe that’s how you read it .
Really I read your logic as that of a cult member. I think you have been indoctrinated to hate, fear, and not trust liberals / Democrats and latched onto the opposition because you cannot accept the truth.
 
You are in an ejection year and you don’t care about the proposals from candidates trying to become POTUS ? That’s new and definitely a different way to go into it .
He wants to wait and see what they do, so he can piss and moan about it. If he votes for a possible winner, he can't stand the pressure of acknowledging he played a part in getting them elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
Really I read your logic as that of a cult member. I think you have been indoctrinated to hate, fear, and not trust liberals / Democrats and latched onto the opposition because you cannot accept the truth.

Still waiting for you to tell me how many Republicans you’ve voted for . Let’s compare the indoctrination levels . 😊
 
The impeachment process has achieved something. It has removed deniability from the Republicans. They were enablers; now they are accomplices. They are all Carmela Soprano in the classic scene with the psychiatrist who speaks the truth about her criminal husband: “One thing you can never say: that you haven’t been told.” The Republican Party as an institution has utterly merged itself into the Trump cover-up machine, and there is no escape for any of them—not the concerned Susan Collins nor the troubled Marco Rubio nor the thoughtful Ben Sasse.

When Senate Republicans make complicit fools of themselves Wednesday and vote to acquit their King of his obvious corruption, we move on to the next crisis.

(1) Bolton's Book.

Bolton writes that Trump first tried to put the squeeze on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in early May 2019—and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone was a witness in the very room where the plot was hatched. Even as Cipollone argued on the president’s behalf that witnesses were unnecessary, he was plausibly alleged to be a crucial fact witness by another fact witness. This double-dealing will surely trigger a new battle to compel testimony from Bolton and Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney—and perhaps to discipline Cipollone for unethical legal conduct. During impeachment proceedings, Bolton and Mulvaney defied congressional subpoenas; now there’s yet more urgency to determine what the president’s team of lawyers actually knew at the time they were making Trump’s case before the Senate.

Then will come the crisis of the administration’s battle to suppress Bolton’s book—and all the other narratives that current insiders may want to tell in order to clear their own besmirched reputations. Does Mulvaney enjoy being the designated sucker in chief of this story? Maybe not.

(2) Trump's Taxes / Hush Money

Even worse for Trump and the Republicans, Ukraine is by no means the only dirty secret being covered up. There are others, and perhaps even more damaging. Sometime before the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in consolidated cases about whether Trump can continue to keep secret his tax returns and other business documents.

One case began with a New York State grand-jury subpoena of Trump business documents, to probe whether he broke laws when he allegedly paid hush money to two women during the 2016 campaign. The others involve subpoenas by House committees—Oversight, Financial Services, and Intelligence—of tax returns and banking records.

The multiple subpoenas raise different legal issues, especially because the Financial Services and Intelligence subpoenas were served not on Trump or his organization, but on his accounting firm and two of his banks. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of some or all of the subpoenas, damaging financial information will tumble into the public domain right as the election season begins in earnest. Worse, the New York State case could conceivably lead to an indictment of Trump. The current practice is that a serving president cannot be prosecuted for a federal crime. What about a state crime? Vice President Aaron Burr was (unsuccessfully) prosecuted for the killing of Alexander Hamilton in 1804. Beyond that, there are not many relevant precedents. Whatever the ultimate constitutional answer to the question, it’s not a good look for a serving president to end a campaign arguing that he should be immune to state as well as federal criminal law. It raises questions like “Maybe we should have a president who has not committed so many crimes?”

Trump can of course hope that he wins on every point in the Supreme Court. Yet such a victory will not protect him unless it is overwhelming. If Trump wins 5–4, with the newest justice, Brett Kavanaugh, casting a vote for secrecy, this outcome will not command much legitimacy among Trump’s political opponents. Instead, they will charge that a justice whose guilty secret was protected by the president is now protecting the president’s own guilty secrets: yet another quid pro quo in an administration notorious for them.

The Next Trump Crisis


Sigh ... A tin foil shortage is inevitable.
 
That was a misspell I'm sure, but it should be status quo.

I started to leave it , I thought it was funny but sooner or later 72 is gonna get me for those . Lol
I know he squints one eye every time he sees one of my posts .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
You are in an election year and you don’t care about the proposals from candidates trying to become POTUS ? That’s new and definitely a different way to go into it .
Are there actual budget numbers attached to their plans? They're are with Trump's and it's pretty scary
 
Unless your name is David Frum and you write for The Atlantic, you just committed a serious case of plagiarism.
I mean not just a case of forgetting to link the source, but you actually took time to cut and paste different parts together and omit other parts.
It must of taken a concerted effort to put this drivel together, probably more so than actually using your own words.


The Next Trump Crisis Is Already Here
OP never responded, hard to wiggle out of.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Link to their actual budget proposals? Are they + or - $5T?

I could link you to both their plans , but ( how does that go ) I don’t feel like doing it for you ? I’m sure you could pull both up .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Still waiting for you to tell me how many Republicans you’ve voted for . Let’s compare the indoctrination levels . 😊
I've actually never voted in a presidential election. I used to be pretty apolitical until this sh!tshow. In order to see how we ended up where we are, I came here. I figured I would find the dregs of society in the politics forum for Tennessee sports, and sure enough here they are. There is so much groupspeak emblematic of a cult in this forum, reality has taken a back seat to a flowery perception of Trump and the necessity to lash out at nonbelievers of the greatness of Trump.
 
I started to leave it , I thought it was funny but sooner or later 72 is gonna get me for those . Lol
I know he squints one eye every time he sees one of my posts .
I'm pretty certain 72 was a high school English teacher back in the day of knuckle raps and mean ass nuns.
 
Exactly. Ignore the words and go with action. That is constantly repeated on here

You can see the proposals the Dem candidates have and compare to them to Trump's spending. Which do you think will drive up the debt worse?
 
You can see the proposals the Dem candidates have and compare to them to Trump's spending. Which do you think will drive up the debt worse?
Oh I think they would but also don't believe Trump is actively applying any brakes. The belief he cares about spending is absurd
 
Not ever really that good in English, but I can spell pretty well and have a good memory.
I used to pretty much have a photographic memory and remember things from 50+ years ago like it was yesterday. I'm pretty certain that I'm going to end up with Alzheimers because I'm becoming more and more forgetful about things that I should remember but forget. Such is life and the ways of the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top