Col_Cathcart
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 4,373
- Likes
- 4,305
Yep I do think it’s a matter of time until the courts strike down all eligibility limits
The Diego Pavia case is just the tip of the iceberg
Because this level of competition is still classified as being "inter-collegiate" athletics, with minimum academic requirements for eligibility still being enforced. NIL has not changed EVERYTHING.In the NIL era, the question is going to come up -- why can't players be allowed to play as long as they want? No restrictions.
Because this level of competition is still classified as being "inter-collegiate" athletics, with minimum academic requirements for eligibility still being enforced. NIL has not changed EVERYTHING.
Therefore, it's reasonable to have eligibility restrictions, based upon a reasonable amount of time needed to complete an education (which could be extended to include graduate studies).
Yep, ZZ is the man! I hate that we lost, but that guy is enjoyable to watch!!! I’m a big fan of ZZ!Man. Listening to the post-game and Barnes talking about ZZ being the player that nobody wanted. Bob asked him what he saw in ZZ during his high school season and Barnes said “What you saw here. He’s like that all the time. The Lord blessed us with him.”
Talked about how he came on a recruiting visit and had to fly home on his own dime because of NCAA regs and it took him 2 days to get the money to go. He was on the verge of quitting basketball and CRB gave him a chance.
Little stories like this are what keeps me tied to college sports. One of the bright spots
Who wants to keep watching the same guys play 6,7,8+ seasons? They’re going to kill the golden goose if they don’t get this thing figured out.I agree with you, but what’s probably going to happen since we live in a day and age where the players have all the power is that “student athletes” become school employees which makes the door to unlimited eligibility wide open.