I'm trying to get my head around this whole thing and I appreciate many of the posts in this thread. The owners are just that, owners. The players are the most highly paid of a long list of employees that the owners are responsible for paying.
The owners are the folks that have to find the funding for stadiums and parking garages, licensing etc...Still it's hard to sympathize with the likes of Jerry Jones. Maybe some of the owners are in fact losing money, who knows. The truth is an owner that is losing money has options not the least of which is to claim a HUGE loss on his taxes. Trade your 1st round pick for cash or simply to get more picks in later rounds and avoid the salary of a top 10 pick. Increase prices. ETC...
The players are the face of the NFL. So when Manning, Brady, and Brees file a suit against the NFL I tend to want to buy what they are selling. I mean IF these guys say it's so, it must be so, right? Bologna! Peyton Manning makes more money from his off the field endorsements than for the touchdowns he throws, same with the rest. If the wealthiest of the players want to help the retired players they certainly can and they should. Coaches too, and the owners as well.
I heard the other day that the NFLPA, now decertified, has asked the upcoming top 25 draftees to snub their draft day invitation. That's pretty interesting. Let me see if I got this right...The NFL players, the same ones trying to negotiate money away from rookies, are asking them to also give up one of the coolest moments in a football players life. Meanwhile, we the fans, with only the draft to look forward to, will miss out on the reaction, the joy or agony, that makes the event great. Thanks!
Though I'm sure this is far more complex, I find it hard to find any sympathy for either side. Seems to me, everyone involved could have a reality check. How much money is enough? The fact that some grown men may not manage their money well or their lifestyle is not the problem of the employer. The guys making the minimum are doing fine too, I mean they can afford excellent insurance, a house, a car and if it all ends tomorrow they should have socked a bit away. Enough to tide them over til they start a real estate co. or an auto dealership back in their college town. The free agent that gets cut gets a head start in life that not most 22 year olds get...
The whole thing is beyond ridiculous. Both sides should be ashamed, JMO.