Shaun1985
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2009
- Messages
- 9,124
- Likes
- 2,182
I agree. We probably won't be happy and end up shafted but I remember reading about how the SEC schedule was already done when they got rid of the East / West stuff. I would think A&M would be Arky but have no idea who Mizzou is going to lay claims too.
Disagree.
That's what hurt us IMO.
If you lose those games like we dd with some this year then you have to win almost all you others.
If we could trade both Memphis games, Pitt and the duke game, for 4 average wins we'd be dancing right now IMO.
If you schedule a lot of hard games it's good for your OOC rank, but if you lose all or most of them, you are in a bad spot.
Tell that to some of those 20+ win teams that did not make it. Schedule tough games and that is the way it is. We don't get there with just average joe's
It was the average joes and below average joes teams that also kept us out of the tournament this year.
True.
But what happens in years like this that you lose a few of those?
My thought is that you can have a decent OOc rank, have a decent overall so because of the sec, and play decent teams OOC. Jmo
I guess what I'm saying is...it's easier to win the majority of your OOC games if they are against decent competition, than it is if 4 or 5 are against great teams and the others against decent and bad teams like this year
Jmo
You are correct.
We should play a few marquee games, but IMO our whole OOC should not be spent against really good teams like Bruce liked to do.
Jmo though
Here's something that I've always thought was a good idea and wondered why we didn't do it: a Christmas tour through the state's smaller schools.
We play ETSU, UTC, Tennessee Tech, UTM, etc in Knoxville in late December, and nobody's there. We play ETSU in the Mini-Dome in late December, and the whole damn thing will be filled to the brim with orange.
*We make money for other schools in the system.
*We have what is very likely a more energetic crowd than we would've in TBA (because getting the Vols is a rare treat in Johnson City, people in Knoxville have better things to do over Christmas, students gone, etc).
*We almost certainly still get a pro-UT crowd. I can't speak directly for UTC or UTM, but being from Johnson City, I know the Mini-Dome would be full of Vols.
*We get a chance to pad our overall road/neutral record against inferior opponents without actually going into a hostile gym (like Oakland)
Downside?
Bruce usually played every single garbage team the state of Tennessee had to offer. We played plent of average teams under Bruce and still scheduled the big boys. I don't understand your argument. How was the schedule too tough this year? You get invited to maui you don't turn it down. Other than that we played Memphis ooc. That was the only other ranked game. Pitt missed nit and uconn was decent. Are schedule has been no wear near Michigan state like but also hasn't been a uf cupcake line. are SOS was always hig because Bruce scheduled decent mid majors. That usually inflated our rpi. These are all good ideas. Something teams like Michigan state have been doing for years.
Tell that to some of those 20+ win teams that did not make it. Schedule tough games and that is the way it is. We don't get there with just average joe's
It was the average joes and below average joes teams that also kept us out of the tournament this year.
You are correct.
We should play a few marquee games, but IMO our whole OOC should not be spent against really good teams like Bruce liked to do.
Jmo though
Those that missed it were either mid majors sl they don't he the good conference SOS, Or they were like miss st and just fell apart.
So if we trade the 4 losses to Memphis, duke and Pitt for wins against decent teams you don't think we make the tournament?
21-10(10-6) ....yea we'd be in.
I enjoyed his scheduling. We were competitive in most and won our share. If were going to lose I would rather it be to the good teams as opposed to losing to the sucky teams like we did this year.
Who said that?
We should play a few marquee games, but IMO our whole OOC should not be spent against really good teams like Bruce liked to do.
Jmo though
Missouri's losing just about everything. They have their point guard back (Pressey)... That's it. They also have a few high-level transfers. Earnest Ross from Auburn, Keion Bell from Pepperdine, and Jabari Brown from Oregon. Then they should have Laurence Bowers returning from injury. They'll be pretty good, but nowhere near as good as this year. I'm thinking top half of the SEC and fringe Top 25. That's about where I'd put my expectations for Tennessee next year as well (although I think Tennessee will be the better of the two).I think two games with Missouri should add to the strength of schedule significantlly. However we will probably lose at least one of these, maybe both, depending on who they have coming back.
I get it as a vibe in the thread as a whole is to play a softer schedule, but here is one example that looks to insinuate that playing an easier schedule is preferred.
If we are a top 15 team I'm fine with it, but this team wasnt and depending on off season move next years may not either.
IMO...if you aren't a very good team, you're better off playing 10 decent teams with the chane of beating 8 or 9 high, as opposed to playing 10 top 15 teams, and the chanc of losing 8 or 9 is high.
Loser mentality? Call it why you want. It's the truth, most middle of the road teams won't go and schedule the hardest SOS.
The top 20 SOS teams are all dancing, and easily. My point is they are good teams, better than UT, sorry but it's true. If you're good as I said a top 15-25 program then ok, you have a good chance of winning some of those like Bruce did, but with this years team and maybe next years, a top SOS is unnecessary IMO.