The Pembroke Postgame Report

#51
#51
Almost as funny as someone being ridiculous enough to have claimed West Virginia to be one of the best teams in the Big East this season.

Conditional picks represent the be-all and end-all of...-all, no? Correct: no.

Read up, tvol, there was talk of spec. and the like. Which as of last week has essentially been ixnayed.

Ramar, to any plain/sane eye, was never a player with pro potential. He proved as much as I and others said through his seasons. I surely hope you weren't one of his backers.

Where's that rm dude and his 'turnovers are a small problem' schtick? I eat that stuff up.
 
#53
#53
Ramar most definitely had pro potential. Had every physical tool for it.

I think the difference here is that many saw beyond silly stuff like that and looked at him for who he was, and found the necessary flaws, and saw the wall which stood in the way of that, and evaluated the person as presented to us, and made the completely right call: he was horrible on the court.

Didn't the bears draft john capel in 2000? didnt etc.
 
#54
#54
Conditional picks represent the be-all and end-all of...-all, no? Correct: no.

Read up, tvol, there was talk of spec. and the like. Which as of last week has essentially been ixnayed.

Ramar, to any plain/sane eye, was never a player with pro potential. He proved as much as I and others said through his seasons. I surely hope you weren't one of his backers.

Where's that rm dude and his 'turnovers are a small problem' schtick? I eat that stuff up.
I eat up losers who listen to dorkwads like Ken Pomeranian and the other stat dipsticks but couldn't fill out a scouting report if their meaningless lives depended on it. I also eat up people who have no real connection to the game telling people who do what is and is not obvious. The five thousand dollar bet still stands. I'm quite sure Maggard will still be glad to have you on his show. However, I'm certain you'll take up neither offer because you don't have the stones for either.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#55
#55
I think the difference here is that many saw beyond silly stuff like that and looked at him for who he was, and found the necessary flaws, and saw the wall which stood in the way of that, and evaluated the person as presented to us, and made the completely right call: he was horrible on the court.

Didn't the bears draft john capel in 2000? didnt etc.
Horrible on the court, yet let's compare him to the alleged upgrade. As a freshman, Ramar was the starting point guard for a team that went to the Sweet 16. As a freshman, Bobby Maze was rooted to the bench for the worst Oklahoma team in 25 years. As a sophomore, Ramar defended Drew Lavender and Jeremy Pargo as well as anyone and made the two biggest baskets in the win that got UT back to the Sweet 16. As a spohomore, Bobby Maze was playing at Tumbleweed State. Getting a point guard who has to be hidden on defense because he can't guard the ground he stands on has really helped this team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#56
#56
I eat up losers who listen to dorkwads like Ken Pomeranian and the other stat dipsticks but couldn't fill out a scouting report if their meaningless lives depended on it. I also eat up people who have no real connection to the game telling people who do what is and is not obvious. The five thousand dollar bet still stands. I'm quite sure Maggard will still be glad to have you on his show. However, I'm certain you'll take up neither offer because you don't have the stones for either.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

It's silly money to play a bet i have no vested interest in...5k on bbal games notorious for 'madness' represents the epitome of foolishness, it's called variance in tension and it's basic brains to anyone with a lick of gambling insight.

Margert may have a show, and that's wicked who-ha and all, but, again" unless you're a podunk skiff and haven't read the basic literature on the nature of dumb talk radio and its entertainment over sound-reason leanings(which see Atl. Mthly's 2006 piece "HOST" for example) you'd be the biggest fool on earth to entertain(pun int.) any notion of that tomfoolery.

It's safe haven for measly buzzards with eyes and no mouth. Count any participant a failed moron from the get-go.

You should know better.

So should he: because ky, no matter their TOs in the last 6, have done just exactly as I said.

Congrats rm.
 
#57
#57
Horrible on the court, yet let's compare him to the alleged upgrade. As a freshman, Ramar was the starting point guard for a team that went to the Sweet 16. As a freshman, Bobby Maze was rooted to the bench for the worst Oklahoma team in 25 years. As a sophomore, Ramar defended Drew Lavender and Jeremy Pargo as well as anyone and made the two biggest baskets in the win that got UT back to the Sweet 16. As a spohomore, Bobby Maze was playing at Tumbleweed State. Getting a point guard who has to be hidden on defense because he can't guard the ground he stands on has really helped this team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Somewhere along the lines you missed how this post was about simply ramar. He was kicked off the team for 'other' reasons, which is wicked fine to me.

Maze aint no saviour(re:(plz) this post's predecessor), but ramar was atrocious...esp. when you take mind of the praise accorded him upon arrival. Beyond the simple expectation-reality flaw: he just blew.

I'm no Maze fan, but I hardly note a difference worth commenting on.
 
#58
#58
It's silly money to play a bet i have no vested interest in...5k on bbal games notorious for 'madness' represents the epitome of foolishness, it's called variance in tension and it's basic brains to anyone with a lick of gambling insight.

Margert may have a show, and that's wicked who-ha and all, but, again" unless you're a podunk skiff and haven't read the basic literature on the nature of dumb talk radio and its entertainment over sound-reason leanings(which see Atl. Mthly's 2006 piece "HOST" for example) you'd be the biggest fool on earth to entertain(pun int.) any notion of that tomfoolery.

It's safe haven for measly buzzards with eyes and no mouth. Count any participant a failed moron from the get-go.

You should know better.

So should he: because ky, no matter their TOs in the last 6, have done just exactly as I said.

Congrats rm.
My bank account between 1994 and 2001 speaks for how "foolish" betting on the NCAA Tournament was for me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#59
#59
47bbc2217857a2.85889427frogview-gallery.jpg

k while you're busy flexing, I'll reiterate: the point in the initial call was to showcase how simple numbers could outperform casual fans. Money was never an issue and only the scared(see: pic) resort to diversionary tactics as it represents--almost wholly obviously, to a basic psych.-minded folk--a potential obstacle to the point's proof...that has nothing to do with the point proper.

Cool, glad we sorted that out for the 9th time.

Flex on brotha man
 
Last edited:
#60
#60
k while you're busy flexing, I'll reiterate: the point in the initial call was to showcase how simple numbers could outperform casual fans. Money was never an issue and only the scared(see: pic) resort to diversionary tactics as it represents--almost wholly obviously, to a basic psych.-minded folk--a potential obstacle to the point's proof...that has nothing to do with the point proper.

Cool, glad we sorted that out for the 9th time.

Flex on brotha man
Keep cowering, stat dweeb. There's no diversionary tactic. It's a bet. The money is simply a measure of how confident I am I can shut up number crunching dweebs at will. Otherwise, I get nothing of value in the exchange.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#61
#61
Keep cowering, stat dweeb. There's no diversionary tactic. It's a bet. The money is simply a measure of how confident I am I can shut up number crunching dweebs at will. Otherwise, I get nothing of value in the exchange.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Point missed #10, grumps. This is, what?, 3.33 outs in baseball? STAT! EEEK DUCK!

I know your type, you're a dime a hundred. You have no faith in your voice other than its volume and the outmoded hoo-aa(see: al pacino c. early 90s; further see: CIRCA NINETEEN-NINETIES!) you pass off as wisdom, and you roll in the past-tense as though that's some kind of manna. If it is: it's stale, and any sensible soul sees that.

The true coward bows out at putting his stake on the line for the sake of it. That's essentially what you've done. You spend countless hours on here posting about nothings, how on earth could it be hard for you to simply choose 20 games of your choice at your leisure?

That's a true mark of cowardice, in almost any book.

But ya, I know: hooof-hooof, raaaah-raaaah, terse comeback, gruff chide, out-of-date one-liner, blarg blarg.

Sounds like talk radio, ha.
 
#62
#62
Point missed #10, grumps. This is, what?, 3.33 outs in baseball? STAT! EEEK DUCK!

I know your type, you're a dime a hundred. You have no faith in your voice other than its volume and the outmoded hoo-aa(see: al pacino c. early 90s; further see: CIRCA NINETEEN-NINETIES!) you pass off as wisdom, and you roll in the past-tense as though that's some kind of manna. If it is: it's stale, and any sensible soul sees that.

The true coward bows out at putting his stake on the line for the sake of it. That's essentially what you've done. You spend countless hours on here posting about nothings, how on earth could it be hard for you to simply choose 20 games of your choice at your leisure?

That's a true mark of cowardice, in almost any book.

But ya, I know: hooof-hooof, raaaah-raaaah, terse comeback, gruff chide, out-of-date one-liner, blarg blarg.

Sounds like talk radio, ha.
Wow, a stat geek and purveyor of semi literate modern psychobabble. You're an intellectual giant. If you don't like the 20 game measure, we can simply do every NCAA Tournament game, against the spread. That way, it's the ultimate apples to apples comparison. However, I'm sure I'll now be inundated with babble that you picked up from some article you read in Redbook, Glamour, or World of Warcraft Weekly. I should always follow my first instinct when it comes to the use of the ignore function.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#63
#63
Point missed #10, grumps. This is, what?, 3.33 outs in baseball? STAT! EEEK DUCK!

I know your type, you're a dime a hundred. You have no faith in your voice other than its volume and the outmoded hoo-aa(see: al pacino c. early 90s; further see: CIRCA NINETEEN-NINETIES!) you pass off as wisdom, and you roll in the past-tense as though that's some kind of manna. If it is: it's stale, and any sensible soul sees that.

The true coward bows out at putting his stake on the line for the sake of it. That's essentially what you've done. You spend countless hours on here posting about nothings, how on earth could it be hard for you to simply choose 20 games of your choice at your leisure?

That's a true mark of cowardice, in almost any book.

But ya, I know: hooof-hooof, raaaah-raaaah, terse comeback, gruff chide, out-of-date one-liner, blarg blarg.

Sounds like talk radio, ha.
If 5 grand constitutes a real "stake" to you, it's time to find a better job.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#64
#64
Wow, a stat geek and purveyor of semi literate modern psychobabble. You're an intellectual giant. If you don't like the 20 game measure, we can simply do every NCAA Tournament game, against the spread. That way, it's the ultimate apples to apples comparison. However, I'm sure I'll now be inundated with babble that you picked up from some article you read in Redbook, Glamour, or World of Warcraft Weekly. I should always follow my first instinct when it comes to the use of the ignore function.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

What's warcraft and redbook and glamour?

also: super sweet use of 'ignore function' dude. Hi-five brah
 
#65
#65
47bbc2217857a2.85889427frogview-gallery.jpg

Posted via VolNation Mobile

So that's a no then, huh?

Look: if you don't have enough faith in your vantage to back it up on a board where you post inane junk like "izzo lost 2 games, he should worry about that" and call that 'content', i dunno what to tell you other than: you have no faith in your opinion.

Go get'em tiger! Let's here some more tu quoque*!

*-apologies if that's too big of a word for you, or some basic tenet of the language that gets in the way of you understanding super straightforward communication, but in case you think that belongs to the world of redback or whatever: it means a You Too!-type argument, which is based entirely on grade-3 antics and the very things your weak rhetoric specializes in.

If you're really a lawyer, and you parlay that kinda rhet., I pity the quote unquote fool.
 
#66
#66
What's warcraft and redbook and glamour?

also: super sweet use of 'ignore function' dude. Hi-five brah

I think you would be more in your element, expanding on the virtues of Princess in your thread about him. You can explain that great defense he played, and how a 5'11 guy hit so many "incredible shots" from 2 feet, and how great he was at stopping his penetration.
 
#67
#67
I think you would be more in your element, expanding on the virtues of Princess in your thread about him. You can explain that great defense he played, and how a 5'11 guy hit so many "incredible shots" from 2 feet, and how great he was at stopping his penetration.

I think you would be more in your element not using weird commas, and also focussing on that thread's initial post's main gist, which shouldn't be hard to grasp for anyone with basic reading comprehension.

Then again: "i think you would be more in your element, expanding..."

I mean why on earth is that there?

"lol grammar smack weak dude", I know. But here's the only thing that's worse: not getting the point of a post and then criticizing it for what it never intended to state.

ya know, quid pro quo(i think that's a latin phrase that tvol reads in rebook monthly or warfest or something)
 
#68
#68
So that's a no then, huh?

Look: if you don't have enough faith in your vantage to back it up on a board where you post inane junk like "izzo lost 2 games, he should worry about that" and call that 'content', i dunno what to tell you other than: you have no faith in your opinion.

Go get'em tiger! Let's here some more tu quoque*!

*-apologies if that's too big of a word for you, or some basic tenet of the language that gets in the way of you understanding super straightforward communication, but in case you think that belongs to the world of redback or whatever: it means a You Too!-type argument, which is based entirely on grade-3 antics and the very things your weak rhetoric specializes in.

If you're really a lawyer, and you parlay that kinda rhet., I pity the quote unquote fool.
A guy who comes on here and babbles about Ken Pomeroy and articles on talk radio complaining about inane junk is rich. See, that's the difference between you and me. I make a living debating points. Actually, I did. I work when the Hell I want to now because my skill has afforded me that luxury. You're just another in the long line of no point tools who have passed through here. You're no more amusing, insightful, or intelligent than any of them. However, guys like you do serve a purpose here. You give us someone to ridicule when we have a beer before a game. Thanks for the comic relief. I'm now done with you.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#71
#71
Sorry lidderer, I'll take Hat's actual experience with all things college basketball - including his ties to Division I coaches - over your verbal masturbation on a message board any day.

If you have something to contribute, please find a way to do so in a manner that is much less grating.
 
#72
#72
A guy who comes on here and babbles about Ken Pomeroy and articles on talk radio complaining about inane junk is rich. See, that's the difference between you and me. I make a living debating points. Actually, I did. I work when the Hell I want to now because my skill has afforded me that luxury. You're just another in the long line of no point tools who have passed through here. You're no more amusing, insightful, or intelligent than any of them. However, guys like you do serve a purpose here. You give us someone to ridicule when we have a beer before a game. Thanks for the comic relief. I'm now done with you.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

True mark of a faux-toughie challenged: "grrr, uh, durr, argh, i'm, ah, done with you! ya ignore! I WIN MOM! I WIN!"

Grow up man, wow. It's a FREAKIN basketball messageboard, don't tie your tug to the train, sheesh.

It's kind of a worthless follow-up you posted there, and is all huff and puff and amounts to nothing but: "I did something once, hoo-aaa! I have'a the money! HIYOOOO! That means i da right on all the stuff! GRAGGG!"

It's kinda sad, to be honest. No wait, that's too vague. It's kind of exactly like our last 8 years of government. Ya, that's the ticket*.

*=I imagine, sadly, that this too is somehow too much of a difficult word for you, or somehow creeps into that warquest territory you know so much about, so I apologize, I didn't mean to use the glottal* "ck" sound to confound you.

*= sorry again, I know this must be awful having to deal with such words, so frustrtaing and all,because as we all know: "the more words one uses to express themself clearly, the dumber they are". My bad. My.....bad.

I won't say good riddance, because god forbid what kinda wrath the word 'riddance' would invoke in such a dumb-speakerin' feller like yrself them chumley.

Now please, and thank you, ignore my posts, they were never intended for you specifically, no matter how much others here treat you as Allah(kool-aid kids, kool-aid).
 
#74
#74
Sorry lidderer, I'll take Hat's actual experience with all things college basketball - including his ties to Division I coaches - over your verbal masturbation on a message board any day.

If you have something to contribute, please find a way to do so in a manner that is much less grating.

No problem man, you're entitled to your opinion, that's what a mboard is for. It's not much fun listenting to people say 'ya, i agree'.

Otherwise we'd all be posting Akon mp3s and laughing about how stupid 'ludwig mozart' is.

If you start looking to post for agreement you lose the whole point of the place.
 
#75
#75
So, sentence fragments are not a problem, but incorrect use of commas is?

Descriptivists vs Prescriptivists.

I know you're joking though, but I mean: Lish, Delillo, Wallace, Barth, Eliot, Angell, Bernhard, Kafka, Carver, blahblahablah
 

VN Store



Back
Top