kidbourbon
Disgusting!
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 5,040
- Likes
- 20
And your assumption was dumb, Axion. Again, not everybody logs on to this site for the sole purpose of co-signing another poster.
My thoughts on Scotty Reynolds from a couple weeks ago: http://www.volnation.com/forum/around-ncaa/96064-teams-can-win-ncaa-championship-3.html#post3350876
I couldn't find anything directly on Reynolds. Do you consider him to be a great pro prospect?
I live in the DC area, where the Reynolds bandwagon is near capacity. I am not on it. If this team has looked like an NCAA championship team at some point this year, it was in one of the games I missed.
Haha. No, that was my point the entire time that there is a distinct difference between a Hansborough and Reynolds, as compared with Durant, Beasley, Evans, Wall, etc.
I think that stands, and I could care less who agrees with that.
There is a difference between the two. No question. Do you agree, though, that there are players who do not belong in the latter group, but who are nonetheless elite/great/theverybest/game-changing players at the college level?
Ty Lawson is a good example.