The perpetual "Oh no, the Govt gonna Shutdown!" Thread, bought to you by the Wingnut LG

#154
#154
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
It's sad you support a democrat imbecile that would disrupt a congressional vote.
Your IQ level is below 50 degree room temperature at best if you defend a Congressman who does such acts of stupidity. They caught the moron on camera pulling a fire alarm to cause chaos while a vote was going on.
Click to expand...
Irony is ironic.
 
#157
#157
clarksvol00 said:
Just to be clear, there are people in the thread wanting this guy prosecuted who are also bringing up the riots.
Click to expand...
just to be clear,
If you wanted the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you didn’t want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
If you didn’t want the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you don’t want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Vol since 77, LouderVol and 1 other person
#161
#161
Orangeslice13 said:
just to be clear,
If you wanted the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
If you didn’t want the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you don’t want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
Click to expand...
Duh. I don't know what comment Septic replied to and I dont know if he wants the guy prosecuted or not, but people are talking about the riots because of this. It's not irrelevant to bring up the distinctions.

Edit: and those distinctions are important. If this guy is prosecuted and doesn't get the harshest sentence given to a rioter who hit a cop, the "riot wasnt a riot" crowd will be all over it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#165
#165
Location of the fire alarm that was pulled and the signs used to stop idiots from exiting through this door and/or pulling the fire alarm. Plus, this door leads to the courtyard and not to a vote as the idiot states.


1696258522555.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#166
#166
lawgator1 said:
Oh sure. Exactly the same thing.
Click to expand...
He performed an illegal action to halt a vote on a critical piece of government action. he should be charged. intent doesn't matter, you can read up on plenty of cases of kids being charged for pulling it, and unless you are going to argue he has less reasoning than a child seems like he is guilty. its a misdemeanor, but he is guilty of obstructing a required piece of government acts critical to the running of this nation.

www.law.cornell.edu

25 CFR § 11.430 - False alarms.

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu
note, that is a federal regulation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and UT_Dutchman
#167
#167
LouderVol said:
yes, but when does that get implemented? That seems to be the issue you are raising. The Rs are pushing #3 and you keep yelling about now not being the right mechanism for that.

the impending shut downs are part of the negotiations that have been on going.

as others have pointed out this is political theatre. Someone will buckle right at the 11th hour, and nothing will be addressed because of your mindset, and we will have this same discussion in November when the Senate proposal ends.
Click to expand...
called the first part. willing to bet the second part comes true too
 
#168
#168
Orangeslice13 said:
I’m suggesting that maybe you should deal with the topic at hand instead of bringing up everything else you can think of
Click to expand...

My response was directly attributed to the far right attempting to stop a vote. It isn't a 'whatabout' when you're asked to come up with a valid point regarding the people in question doing exactly what is in question.

Try to keep up.

Vol8188 said:
When the “lunatics on the right” start pulling fire alarms to avoid votes, you may have a valid point. Until then you should just give up
Click to expand...
 
#169
#169
Orangeslice13 said:
just to be clear,
If you wanted the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
If you didn’t want the Jan 6th people prosecuted then you don’t want this guy prosecuted or you’re a political hack.
Click to expand...

How about tjose who believe they all should be prosecuted?
 
#172
#172
clarksvol00 said:
Duh. I don't know what comment Septic replied to and I dont know if he wants the guy prosecuted or not, but people are talking about the riots because of this. It's not irrelevant to bring up the distinctions.

Edit: and those distinctions are important. If this guy is prosecuted and doesn't get the harshest sentence given to a rioter who hit a cop, the "riot wasnt a riot" crowd will be all over it.
Click to expand...
I’m sure septic really appreciates you helping him.
Except that I don’t know what you’re rambling about now. So you’re not really helping but just mindlessly defending your lefty buddy. Then again that’s what you openly admit you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#174
#174
Septic said:
My response was directly attributed to the far right attempting to stop a vote. It isn't a 'whatabout' when you're asked to come up with a valid point regarding the people in question doing exactly what is in question.

Try to keep up.
Click to expand...
Sure it is.
It’s wrong in any case.
So the only reason you would bring it up is if you are on a side
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Vol since 77
#175
#175
Orangeslice13 said:
I’m sure septic really appreciates you helping him.
Except that I don’t know what you’re rambling about now. So you’re not really helping but just mindlessly defending your lefty buddy. Then again that’s what you openly admit you do.
Click to expand...
Touchy today. You haven't noticed people in this thread who want this guy prosecuted bringing up the riots?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top