The Play Calling Against Oklahoma Thread

This every year. Gotta love all the experts here at play calling. I guess that's why you're on a forum talking about it and not actually making calls on a sideline. They are playing to their strengths. In case you didn't notice, Oklahoma's d-line was brutal. What did you expect, us to line up and play smash mouth football with them? We are not yet equipped for that. When are all you that are complaining gonna stop whining and realize that we are in the process of getting better? This team will be better as the season progresses.

I feel like I'm taking CRAZY PILLS - YouTube
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Overall ok... In the red zone it was highly questionable at best.

Not that I'm taking up for the play calling, but weren't we like 11/12 in the Red Zone for the first two games? It seemed like the coaches stuck to what worked prior. Again, not saying that worked, but that's what it seemed.

There were moments that UT looked to have counters to what OU was bringing but a little to late in the game for those types adjustments. If we could do those adjustments earlier, then we would be on the attack, not merely trying to hold our ground with our defense.
 
Not that I'm taking up for the play calling, but weren't we like 11/12 in the Red Zone for the first two games? It seemed like the coaches stuck to what worked prior. Again, not saying that worked, but that's what it seemed.

There were moments that UT looked to have counters to what OU was bringing but a little to late in the game for those types adjustments. If we could do those adjustments earlier, then we would be on the attack, not merely trying to hold our ground with our defense.

I can find no excuse for an empty backfield on 3rd and 2, and I can't understand why you wait until 3rd and 17 to dial up North. your proven absolute most proven point producer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Post Game observations:

1) Our offense could have solved Oklahoma's constant pass rush with a few quick slant plays. We should could have mixed it up by throwing slants to a sure-handed receiver from the slot position, and also throwing slants to a designated tight-end from a double tight-end formation. The 2 tight-end formation makes it even harder to defend, as it could come from either side.

These plays are Kryptonyte to an aggressive blitzing defense. I am sure that everyone is familiar with the Manning to Welker slants. Just when the defense adjusts to the slot receiver slants, Manning will run a quick slant to tight-end Julius Thomas or Jacob Tamme. A super-aggressive linebacker like Striker would have only seen the backs of our jerseys until he stopped blitzing on every play. But sometimes a defense is just too good to beat on a given day, like when Seattle solved Denver in the Superbowl. That may have been the case with Oklahoma and our young O-line, but we didn't even try to give them consequences for blitzing us.

These timing slant passes are thrown almost immediately after the snap, and the ball would have left Worley's hands before a defensive lineman ran past our Freshman tackle. Once a few of these quick slants gained 15-30 yards, the defense would have been forced to stay back and defend the zone behind them. They still would have blitzed, but only occasionally. On the plays when Oklahoma didn't blitz, Worley was doing a great job of avoiding the 3-man rush, and finding open receivers. The game would have been much closer with this adjustment alone.

No matter how you slice it, the failure to run quick slants cost Tennessee a real opportunity to win the game. I love Coach Jones, and hope he stays for many years to come, but CBJ and his staff must learn to make adjustments mid-game. Failing to make "Coaching 101" adjustments makes the coaching staff appear to be a liability. Running Back screens took too long to develop, Oklahoma was to fast and disciplined for reverses, jet sweeps, and bubble screens. It shouldn't have taken 4 quarters to figure that out.

2) We must immediately learn to be tougher at the wide-receiver position. Yes, we now have elite talent and speed, but our receivers aren't attacking the ball. There were several passes that our receivers could have caught if they would have dove or made a better effort.

Croom should have never allowed the endzone pass to be intercepted. It was a great play by the Oklahoma's CB, but Croom had the inside position. He could have turned his body, put himself between the ball and the defender, and easily made the TD catch.

I believe the referees should have penalized Oklahoma DBs for holding, pushing, and tugging downfield. But once the tone of the game was set by the referees, it was our WR's responsibility to make contested receptions. I can't remember a group of receivers dropping almost every contested pass in a game.

3) We must do something to shore up our broken levee of an O-Line. I know our O-Line is young and inexperienced, and I know that we have reinforcements on their way to Knoxville next year... but tonight proved that Team 118 can compete with most SEC foes this year if they fix this problem. But we won't be able to compete if we have O-linemen who can barely get a hand on a pass rusher. I don't know exactly what can be done, but the coaches need to figure it out. Watching the tape of this game on a loop is a good start.

4) Our future is bright. Instead of blaming the loss on our lack of talent and speed, we are actually talking about football and inexperience. This is a huge step in the process of re-building a national football power. Our skill positions are loaded with raw talent and speed. Jalen Hurd will be a stud. Our young defensive players are playing way better than advertised, and there are many more young players learning behind them on the depth chart. The difference between 2014 and next year will be even more significant because of all the experience the young players are gaining each game.

Now it is time for our coaches and players to learn how to succeed on a bigger stage. Tonight showed the young players the gap that still exists between Team 118 and a playoff-bid. But these young Vols seem to have narrowed that gap significantly. Go Vols!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
When I saw empty backfield on 3rd and 2 I though worst case is that worley has a scrambling chance to pick up 1st. He saw a hole it was there. If he throws the ball low and away its 6. That was tough..I was more irritated with the 1st down play calls to the sidelines. Not a fan of trying to pop those screens / swing passes when there is no threat over the top. OU took away the slants. They were all over those slants.. Worley Was smart not to force those. There were several deep routes coming open worley saw them but no time. I hope that 2nd sweep was gonna be a throwback but OU blew it up. I hope it was designed for everyone that has ever seen a football game to know that it was the sweep again..then whoop touchdown! I keep telling myself that was the intent because I don't want to believe that the OC truly thought that would be a good play to call.
 
Anyone that's ever coached knows how hard it is to call plays when you can't block anything.

That is why we should have put Worley on roll outs the same way Oklahoma did their qb. It gives your qb more time to throw & the option to run. I was hoping we would put Dobbs in on some plays, he would have picked up some huge yds with his legs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
While I haven't read but a couple of post here because there's not one of us who know the game plan etc...I do wish we had run the ball more at the blitz....overall...fairly good job of play calling when all things are considered...
 
The TE was wide open. Making a 2nd read would have made it toss and catch. O line woes forced us into not making reads. Worley forced the throw.
 
I didn't agree with the call but to say it was a terrible called game is a stretch to me. We did a pretty decent job keeping it close outside a few poorly executed plays. You can't catch the ball in the end zone for croom or block for the tackle and te who were absolutely terrible. This is a very close game if we executed better on a handful of offensive and defensive plays and ou is one of the best teams in the country. Very proud of worley and the team.
 
Actually, the people who don't think that the play calling is partly to blame in the offensive struggles tonight have no football IQ at all.

Just STFU Grapeboy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1:finger3: The only thing that would have been better is having your 8 year old azz calling the plays,rotflmao!!!!
 
That is not really a part of this offense ...and never will be . The backs read the zone at the hand-off and go to one of 3 gap...but the backs make that read . When the QB pulls the hand off , he does not run in this offense . He pulls up and passes in a layered west coast system . Evene if we get a TRUE running QB ...you will not see much running, maybe none at all . You will see what I just described.

The problem tonight is that the pressure was instant ..poor blocking. Worley could not execute the play fake and read . OU sat on the under layesr because they knew we did not have time for the top layers to develop.

This system will be very effective when we can block it well.
Then why couldn't they run it last yr. with an NFL line? What will next yrs excuse be?
 
You just have to make better decisions than that. This is why we lose ball games. You go empty backfield, basically tell them you're going to throw, then force one and cause a pick 6.


3rd and 2, on the goal line.... RUN THE BALL!!!!! That's why you lose games in the SEC. If you don't know to take your big back and shove him to the line for 2 yards, and if he fails you kick the field goal and make it a 2 possession game, then you won't win in this league.

I literally couldn't believe my eyes when I saw an empty backfield. We had momentum and we could have made it a 10 point game. Butch needs to get that fixed or enjoy mediocrity during his time here.

Buy a book about football. It might help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
They were all over those slants.. Worley Was smart not to force those.

No they weren't...we never ran a true slot/tight end slant which requires almost no QB dropback. You must be referring to the outside receiver slant that Worley tried a few times to Malone/North. Those were covered well as their CBs were pro caliber. The quick slot/tight end slant would have went to Pig, Downs, or Helms...and required LB coverage to the inside.
 
i agree, i dont care who says it dont but our offensive play calling has sucked, it sucked last year.. it has sucked the last few games and it sucks now, our o-line is not good on the right side or the middle..we are young...no slants very few screens... why go 5 wr in 5 yards all the defense has to do is stand and react watch the qb eyes.

Not sure if serious. We run an average if three to four bubble screens every game. Unless you haven't been watching the same games. We are very very young and inexperienced up front and if you was calling the plays and needed a touchdown where would you have faith? Senior QB with talent all across the field at WR? Or a young OL that hadn't played well all night?
 
THAT was a great play call with poor execution by a subpar player.

You can't have a great play call if you send the subpar player to execute it - OC should know which of his players is likely to execute that play so that actually made it a bad play call (if you actually believe Croom is a subpar player - I'm not ready to write him off quite yet). However, not calling any slants was most shocking - the way OK defense attacked us and given the type of receivers we have that should have been the most frequent call last night to get them to back off (has our OC never watched Peyton who wrote the book on how to deal with blitzing defenses and quick slant is the answer when you have good receivers at your disposal).
 

VN Store



Back
Top