The Problems with Trans-ideology

[Sea Ray]

Watch the video included in the tweet above. Pat had rougher practices than that

The video is just one snap shot. It's pretty clear why the team decided to forfeit

 

[utvolpj]

The video is just one snap shot. It's pretty clear why the team decided to forfeitView attachment 621170

Do you really believe they used the least violent occurrence in the video?

The statement says the coach was worried about the upcoming playoffs and was already missing a third of his team. This just seems like a convenient excuse given the video of a girl falling down

 

[85SugarVol]

I think it's ridiculous they're playing but that description and video don't match.

girls are mean enough as it is

Yellow Card!

 

[Sea Ray]

Do you really believe they used the least violent occurrence in the video?

The statement says the coach was worried about the upcoming playoffs and was already missing a third of his team. This just seems like a convenient excuse given the video of a girl falling down

Did you not read the (politically correct) letter from the forfeiting school? Please note the reference to injuries and "state laws regarding equity and access for all student-athletes". I'm sure there's a reason why that line was included

 

[utvolpj]

Did you not read the (politically correct) letter from the forfeiting school? Please note the reference to injuries and "state laws regarding equity and access for all student-athletes". I'm sure there's a reason why that line was included

He stated a third of his team was unavailable for the game and that they have playoffs coming up. Just saying it sounds sketchy based on the video provided

 

[Sea Ray]

He stated a third of his team was unavailable for the game and that they have playoffs coming up. Just saying it sounds sketchy based on the video provided

I don't understand your point. The letter stated that 3 girls "went down" during the game. What are you questioning?

 

[utvolpj]

I don't understand your point. The letter stated that 3 girls "went down" during the game. What are you questioning?

That the video shows a game ending injury. Also question that it had anything to do with the opponent. He was down to 8 players from the start and likely realized them playing the whole game would possibly hurt their playoff chances. He made a calculated decision based on being able to blame the opponent. Why even start the game if that's the case?

 

[NashVol11]

LoTT would absolutely show the worst-looking injury they had on video, because they are a garbage tabloid, and the one they came up with is weak as hell. There's a good chance the other 2 are sprained ankles or similar

 

[Sea Ray]

That the video shows a game ending injury. Also question that it had anything to do with the opponent. He was down to 8 players from the start and likely realized them playing the whole game would possibly hurt their playoff chances. He made a calculated decision based on being able to blame the opponent. Why even start the game if that's the case?

To be honest, that video was pretty fuzzy. I can't come to a firm conclusion what happened. It looked like her back was injured. I do think it's likely the girls didn't feel safe and that coupled with 3 injuries led to the forfeit

 

[85SugarVol]

To be honest, that video was pretty fuzzy. I can't come to a firm conclusion what happened. It looked like her back was injured. I do think it's likely the girls didn't feel safe and that coupled with 3 injuries led to the forfeit

I saw a larger player fling a smaller player to the ground in a tussle over the basketball.

Infer what you will with regards to the larger and smaller players in the video.

 

[NashVol11]

I saw a larger player fling a smaller player to the ground in a tussle over the basketball.

Infer what you will with regards to the larger and smaller players in the video.

That’s not “flinging someone to the ground” lol, that happens in every basketball game

 

[NashVol11]

Did you not read the (politically correct) letter from the forfeiting school? Please note the reference to injuries and "state laws regarding equity and access for all student-athletes". I'm sure there's a reason why that line was included

That sounds like their issue isn’t sharing a court with a trans person, it’s that they don’t have many players. Reading it the opposite way is a very strange reach, and LoTT still hasn’t provided evidence that the 3 injuries were all that one player’s fault.

(In fact, if they were, LoTT probably would show video of all three for maximum outrage, because they are a garbage tabloid)

 

[85SugarVol]

That’s not “flinging someone to the ground” lol, that happens in every basketball game

Sure it does. 2 players going after the ball with their hands on it.

One player was bigger, and won. The other player went down. That’s gonna happen.

 

[Sandman 423]

Sure it does. 2 players going after the ball with their hands on it.

One player was bigger, and won. The other player went down. That’s gonna happen.

One 6'3" player with a peg and facial hair. It is almost as if they weren't made the same way.

 

[volbeast33]

A buddy of mine has a neighbor that wears skinny jeans and pointy toed shoes.

your buddy lives next to Huff?

 

[Sea Ray]

That sounds like their issue isn’t sharing a court with a trans person, it’s that they don’t have many players. Reading it the opposite way is a very strange reach, and LoTT still hasn’t provided evidence that the 3 injuries were all that one player’s fault.

(In fact, if they were, LoTT probably would show video of all three for maximum outrage, because they are a garbage tabloid)

They're not going to provide evidence 'cause they don't wanna make a big deal out of it. They just wanna play their next game. The players did express a fear of injury if they played the 2nd half. Gee I wonder why they'd feel that way?

“Once the third was injured, the remaining five expressed concern to him about continuing to play,” it continues. “The players feared getting injured and not being able to compete in the playoffs.”

The school added that it supports the coach’s decision to call the game, notably emphasizing its commitment to “inclusivity” and “equity.”

Video: Trans Controversy Erupts When Girls Basketball Game Ends In Forfeit Following Three Injuries | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can't imagine the hoops you'd have to jump through to still say that you're not convinced that the tranny was injuring girls. If you can't connect those dots then this is a you problem

 

[NashVol11]

They're not going to provide evidence 'cause they don't wanna make a big deal out of it. They just wanna play their next game. The players did express a fear of injury if they played the 2nd half. Gee I wonder why they'd feel that way?

Video: Trans Controversy Erupts When Girls Basketball Game Ends In Forfeit Following Three Injuries | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can't imagine the hoops you'd have to jump through to still say that you're not convinced that the tranny was injuring girls. If you can't connect those dots then this is a you problem

LibsOfTikTok absolutely wants to make a big deal out of it, and apparently has some video. If the video of the other injuries looked even remotely like the trans girl hurt them, it would be in that tweet, and it's not. Why do you think that is?

Maybe because they know all they have to do is say "3 girls injured + trans girl was participating" and leave it to idiots to connect dots that aren't there

 

[NashVol11]

Even Fox News of all sources is pointing out that this isn’t backed up by anything lol. They also played earlier in the season with apparently no issue

KIPP Academy did not immediately answer a request for clarification regarding the athlete’s gender identity.

Prior to this injury, two others had been suffered by a Collegiate Charter team that was only carrying an eight-player bench due to injuries in previous games. It is unknown if these injuries occurred during plays involving the biological male athlete.

 

[Vol8188]

Even Fox News of all sources is pointing out that this isn’t backed up by anything lol. They also played earlier in the season with apparently no issue

Is your issue here only with the false reporting that the injuries were due to the male athlete or are you also defending having males play against females?

 

[Sea Ray]

LibsOfTikTok absolutely wants to make a big deal out of it, and apparently has some video. If the video of the other injuries looked even remotely like the trans girl hurt them, it would be in that tweet, and it's not. Why do you think that is?

Maybe because they know all they have to do is say "3 girls injured + trans girl was participating" and leave it to idiots to connect dots that aren't there

I can't speak to what video that site has. I'm amazed you're privy to such information.

 

[volfanhill]

I don't know what everyone's upset about

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Indiana Parents Warn Nation After Child Is Removed From Home For Improper Pronoun Usage: ‘Can Happen Anywhere’​

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

Becket is pursuing the case on behalf of the Coxes, arguing state courts allowed Indiana to keep the child from living in his parents' home due to their disagreement with the child's gender identity because of their religious beliefs. Notably, upon completing the investigation, the state determined the allegations of abuse against Mary and Jeremy were unsubstantiated, but still argued that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

 

[85SugarVol]

Indiana Parents Warn Nation After Child Is Removed From Home For Improper Pronoun Usage: ‘Can Happen Anywhere’​

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

Becket is pursuing the case on behalf of the Coxes, arguing state courts allowed Indiana to keep the child from living in his parents' home due to their disagreement with the child's gender identity because of their religious beliefs. Notably, upon completing the investigation, the state determined the allegations of abuse against Mary and Jeremy were unsubstantiated, but still argued that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

Someone reported the parents for mis-gendering. And the State took their child.

But, in 2021, Indiana officials began investigating the Coxes after a report found they were not referring to their child by his preferred gender identity, removing the teen from their custody and placing him in a "gender-affirming" home.

Remember when we used to worry about conservative parents kicking their gay kids out?

 

[Sea Ray]

Indiana Parents Warn Nation After Child Is Removed From Home For Improper Pronoun Usage: ‘Can Happen Anywhere’​

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

Becket is pursuing the case on behalf of the Coxes, arguing state courts allowed Indiana to keep the child from living in his parents' home due to their disagreement with the child's gender identity because of their religious beliefs. Notably, upon completing the investigation, the state determined the allegations of abuse against Mary and Jeremy were unsubstantiated, but still argued that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

I wonder why the article didn't mention the age of the child. That'd be interesting to know

 

[whodeycin85]

I wonder why the article didn't mention the age of the child. That'd be interesting to know

at the time 15