The Problems with Trans-ideology

#4,827
#4,827
DinkinFlicka said:
However, if you want to discuss quality, LoTT is boomer chain email tier. Lincoln project is bad, but LoTT is hands down the worst.

VNPF OG's will know what I mean when I say it's as though gsvol ran a twitter account.
Click to expand...
I don't really care about any social media as it has all drug society down as whole.

You have your opinion and I have mine. Like I said, both are garbage and neither is better than the other. You just seem upset that I called out the progressive liberal democrat rag that is lincoln project. You have no problem with me calling out LoTT the same. I'm not a partisan hack like you.
 
#4,828
#4,828
Vol since 77 said:
I don't really care about any social media as it has all drug society down as whole.

You have your opinion and I have mine. Like I said, both are garbage and neither is better than the other. You just seem upset that I called out the progressive liberal democrat rag that is lincoln project. You have no problem with me calling out LoTT the same. I'm not a partisan hack like you.
Click to expand...

I literally just said the Lincoln project was bad. If you think correcting you is me "getting upset," you're just projecting.

Calm down. Eat a snickers. Rub one out.

And just so we're clear, *you* calling *me* a partisan hack is ****ing hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and PEPPERJAX
#4,833
#4,833
Man that hurt. Nearly a full Scorpion from a dead standstill. On what looks like either tile or hardwood likely laid on a concrete slab. There was exactly zero "give" in that floor lmao. Hope dude made a full recovery at some point.
 
#4,836
#4,836
McDad said:
No not necessarily other. There could be single fixture bathrooms or bathrooms that male and female teachers have access to which should be safer for kids. I mean I don't want to rebuild schools and drain more money out of government funding but it would seem to me a simple solution would be possible given how many bathrooms are in a typical School
Click to expand...

Won't fly. The complaint will be that the "nons" are being "othered."
 
#4,840
#4,840
utvolpj said:
Commonplace? You're really stretching the meaning of that
Click to expand...

While i agree that it is still rare, that is hardly the point.

The point is biological makes should never, ever be allowed to compete in female athletics. Its ridiculous on its face, and anyone who supports it should be ashamed of themselves. Period.

Every coach needs to boycott like the 1 did above. Females need to refuse to compete in any event allowing a male until sanity is eventually restored. Its freaking ridiculous and people shouldn't even have to be told this. Especially adults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, CagleMtnVol, StarRaider and 4 others
#4,841
#4,841
marcusluvsvols said:
While i agree that it is still rare, that is hardly the point.

The point is biological makes should never, ever be allowed to compete in female athletics. Its ridiculous on its face, and anyone who supports it should be ashamed of themselves. Period.

Every coach needs to boycott like the 1 did above. Females need to refuse to compete in any event allowing a male until sanity is eventually restored. Its freaking ridiculous and people shouldn't even have to be told this. Especially adults.
Click to expand...
No that was exactly the point of the post - pretend like this is an epidemic. A handful of incidents is hardly commonplace and not really worth the continual outrage. It's an agenda piece
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#4,842
#4,842
utvolpj said:
No that was exactly the point of the post - pretend like this is an epidemic. A handful of incidents is hardly commonplace and not really worth the continual outrage. It's an agenda piece
Click to expand...
Is there a women's sport that hasn't been invaded by men??? softball, maybe

It.more common then you realize
 
#4,844
#4,844
whodeycin85 said:
Remeber when we were told this stuff wouldnt happen..and now within 3 years it becoming common place for men to say they are women because they cant play with men
Click to expand...
Well, no one said that. That this wouldn’t happen.

Some said things along the lines of - “get back to me when they start winning”. Or something like that.

The percentage of trans women competing against biological women is minuscule - which makes it easy to dismiss.

The percentage increase of trans women competing against biological women appears to be dramatic - which makes it easy to rail against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DinkinFlicka, whodeycin85 and MemphisVol77
#4,845
#4,845
utvolpj said:
No that was exactly the point of the post - pretend like this is an epidemic.
Click to expand...
It doesn't have to be an epidemic to find it worthy of discussion if you don't approve of biological boys competing against biological girls in school sports.
utvolpj said:
A handful of incidents is hardly commonplace and not really worth the continual outrage.
Click to expand...
23 states have already passed laws restricting biological boys from competing against girls in school sports. 5 of those 23 states restrict biological girls from competing against boys in school sports as well.

Do you think there wouldn't be more cases in those 23 states if it wasn't restricted?
utvolpj said:
It's an agenda piece
Click to expand...
I agree it's an agenda. It's about protecting girls athletics to some. I think there are other agendas which can, will, and have been exploited at the expense of girls athletics.

This issue has long since been politicized and it isn't going away. Either make girls athletics a protected class and have an all inclusive open class, or make a 3rd class for trans athletes.

I really don't mean to sound cruel or insensitive to anyone with gender dysphoria, but transposing their dysphoria into biological disparity within girls athletics isn't a solution.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, CobbVol, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#4,848
#4,848
So much hypocrisy.

You won't find teenage males complaining when the head female cheerleader decides that she is male and joins the guys in the showers.
 
#4,849
#4,849
Yea. How this and pronoun usage go is first it is not happening and you are nuts. Then it is happening but it is rare. Then you need to accept and if not an "ism or ist" will be framed on you and your thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sea Ray and whodeycin85
#4,850
#4,850
utvolpj said:
It's simply not common which is why the incidents stand out so much. Have to make a big deal of rare events
Click to expand...
This is the response of someone who can't defend his point of view. We hear the same thing from liberals about late term abortion. "It's not necessary to put any limits on it 'cause women hardly ever abort babies after the first trimester"

No, we need to nip this in the bud before it gets to be commonplace now's the time to address it
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and whodeycin85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top