n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 87,308
- Likes
- 52,500
Thing is though, they aren't trying. That's where your delusion takes over. It is not in their best interest to end racism because there would be nothing for them to exploit.Yes, an end to all racism and inherent systemic inequality was promised by the Dems by January 31 and they have failed.
Therefore, stop trying.
How can I honest if I'm just guessing? I'd actually be kinda surprised if there is no research on this.
For one if they were basing this in data, they’d likely present the data. But even then if x% of black people don’t know the last four of their social, they’d also have to not have a Dl, another form of ID, or a utility bill.
So is the number 0%? Probably not. Is very close? I’d imagine so.
There is no good excuse for not being able to come up with a valid form of ID. Will it be an issue for some people? Yes. Will it be significant issue for the country? Problaby not.
Nobody said anything about anybody being incapable.
Do you think everybody knows their SS#? Seems likely that out of 350m people, there are some who do not. Would you bet that they are poor or well-to-do?
poor people are more likely to know their SS because they have to have it for government servicesI don't know what they're basing it on. This isn't about my beliefs. It's about what they said.
Personally, I would guess that poor people are less likely to have a valid ID and are probably less likely to know their SS#, and certain minorities are disproportionately poor. It's not racist to think poverty is the underlying cause of the issue.
I agree. I shouldn’t have stated the Washington post is claiming that. But if it’s not about knowing your SS# then please tell me what I’m missing?
Does it not say you must have either your DL # or SS# and that this will disenfranchise black voters?
So if they know their social security number, how are they being disenfranchised by this?