Stark's point, on which I concur, is that Horner was really a pretty bad player.
Makes sense I suppose.In short, people spend so much time complaining about how much publicity Jeter receives, they overlook what a consistent, clutch player he is and the fact that he's one of the best leaders in sports.
With Larkin, he's comparing him to his contemporaries and those who came before him. His point, which I think is totally accurate, is that the fact that there is any debate about Barry Larkin making the Hall of Fame shows he's vastly underrated. His point on Jeter is posted earlier in the thread. The book has some amazing numbers backing up his assertions about Larkin.Hat, is he saying that Jeter and Larkin should overwhelmingly be considered the two best SS of all-time? B/c from my POV, that's the only way they're currently the 2 most underrated SS ever.
That was a classic. My favorite is either the story about him having roughly $1 mil in uncashed paychecks in his glove compartment or the following conversation with his agent, when he was house shopping in Boston, after signing his massive contract:My favorite "Manny being Manny" moment and possibly one of my favorite (blooper) plays of the last few years was that cutoff catch he made from the center fielder who was standing about 20-30 feet away from him. Dove out to snag it and everything. :lol:
With Larkin, he's comparing him to his contemporaries and those who came before him. His point, which I think is totally accurate, is that the fact that there is any debate about Barry Larkin making the Hall of Fame shows he's vastly underrated. His point on Jeter is posted earlier in the thread. The book has some amazing numbers backing up his assertions about Larkin.