volfanbill
pack light and love heavy…
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 44,471
- Likes
- 31,459
You don't even need to wait for him to win. The media, in particular ESPN, seems to do 180s on Woods about 3-4 times a year.
If he's playing well leading up to a major, especially if he wins a tournament, they declare that he's back and put him as the favorite to win the next major. When he doesn't win it, they immediately start talking about how he's fallen, especially if it plays out that he went into Sunday with a good shot to win and falters.
If he doesn't win the PGA, look for a slew of articles about his demise between then and next April before the Masters, when they'll declare he's prime to win it.
At one point Sunday one of the announcers said "This clearly isn't the Tiger we're used to seeing." Really? Looked like the same major Weekend Tiger we've all been watching for a few years now. The media glamorizes Tiger and has chosen to go the sensational route with reporting rather than just sell the news. Most people, especially ESPN, believe that golf can't sell at its current rate without Tiger being the focal point. I personally disagree. I think Tiger led the PGA to its current status, but there are now enough big names and marquee players to keep it going even if Tiger isn't in the picture one weekend. The only problem is no one is trying to sell that angle.
I also think ESPN is in trouble because of their desire to report in such a sensationalistic style of journalism. It is mind boggling how many reporters have jumped ship in the past year and a half or so.